Central European Business Review 2023, 12(5):177-199 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.357

Shaping Farm Workers' Political Trust: The Moderating Role of Misinformation Exposure

Stefanie Berg ORCID...1, Jindrich Spicka ORCID...2
1 Institute of Corporate Strategy, Göttingen, Germany, stefanieberg.dr@gmail.com (corresponding author)
2 Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, spickaj@pef.czu.cz

Political trust is an important indicator for evaluating relations between politicians and stakeholders. In agriculture, political trust has not been researched in depth, although agriculture is highly regulated by policies related to access to resources. This paper addresses this knowledge gap by answering the question of the role of institutionalized and non-institutionalized social communication in shaping farm workers' political trust. The multiple regression on a sample of 1,016 farm workers from the Europe-wide 2020 European Social Survey yields new insights. A key finding is the moderating effect of the opinion that online communication channels expose people to misinformation on the relationship between farm workers' trust in politics as a dependent variable and frequency of social contacts, time spent monitoring politics and current affairs, and membership in professional associations. In addition, political trust was found to increase as farm workers' interest in politics and monitoring news about politics and current affairs increased. While political trust is positively associated with farm workers' institutionalized participation in professional associations, it is negatively associated with non-institutionalized networking. Confirmation bias associated with farm workers' networking is particularly risky. Another important finding is lower political trust among households with a subjectively worse financial situation.
Implications for Central European audience: Government, formal networks (professional associations), and informal networks (social networks) provide verified and trustworthy information. At the same time, farmers themselves should have sufficient information literacy to critically assess the credibility of the information. The farm worker's education plays an important role and is significantly related to most of the main effects. The study's conclusions also include suggestions for follow-up research.

Keywords: political trust; entrepreneurs; agriculture; social communication; misinformation; farm workers
JEL classification: D83, J43

Received: June 14, 2023; Revised: October 29, 2023; Accepted: November 11, 2023; Published: December 18, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Berg, S., & Spicka, J. (2023). Shaping Farm Workers' Political Trust: The Moderating Role of Misinformation Exposure. Central European Business Review, 12(5), 177-199. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.357
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ahmed, S. (2021). Who inadvertently shares deepfakes? Analyzing the role of political interest, cognitive ability, and social network size. Telematics and Informatics, 57, 101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101508 Go to original source...
    2. Alkon, M., & Urpelainen, J. (2018). Trust in Government and Subsidy Reform: Evidence from a Survey of Indian Farmers. Studies in Comparative International Development, 53(4), 449-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9266-1 Go to original source...
    3. Ambali, O. I., & Begho, T. (2021). Examining the relationship between farmers' perceived trust and investment preferences. Journal of International Development, 33(8), 1290-1303. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3576 Go to original source...
    4. Andretta, M., Bosi, L., & Porta, D. D. (2016). Participants in trade union-staged demonstrations: A cross-country comparison. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 22(3), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916657991 Go to original source...
    5. Bachke, M. E. (2019). Do farmers' organizations enhance the welfare of smallholders? Findings from the Mozambican national agricultural survey. Food Policy, 89, 101792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101792 Go to original source...
    6. Bizikova, L., Nkonya, E., Minah, M., Hanisch, M., Turaga, R. M. R., Speranza, C. I., Karthikeyan, M., Tang, L., Ghezzi-Kopel, K., Kelly, J., Celestin, A. C., & Timmers, B. (2020). A scoping review of the contributions of farmers' organizations to smallholder agriculture. Nature Food, 1(10), 620-630. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00164-x Go to original source...
    7. Catterberg, G. (2006). The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh081 Go to original source...
    8. Ceron, A. (2015). Internet, News, and Political Trust: The Difference Between Social Media and Online Media Outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 487-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12129 Go to original source...
    9. Crepaz, M., & Arikan, G. (2021). Information disclosure and political trust during the COVID-19 crisis: Experimental evidence from Ireland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2021.1924738 Go to original source...
    10. Ellis, R. (2020). Frontline Farmers: How the National Farmers Union Resists Agribusiness and Creates Our New Food Future. Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l'alimentation, 7(2), 99-101. https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v7i2.388 Go to original source...
    11. ESS. (2023). European Social Survey round 10-2020. Democracy, Digital social contacts (3.0) [dataset]. https://doi.org/10.18712/ess10e03_0 Go to original source...
    12. Ferreira, G. B., & Borges, S. (2020). Media and Misinformation in Times of COVID-19: How People Informed Themselves in the Days Following the Portuguese Declaration of the State of Emergency. Journalism and Media, 1(1), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia1010008 Go to original source...
    13. Fox, J. (2019). Regression Diagnostics: An Introduction (2. vyd.). SAGE Publications.
    14. Gabriel, O. W. (2017). Participation and political trust. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. Van Der Meer (Ed.), Handbook on Political Trust. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545118.00025 Go to original source...
    15. Gautam, R. S., Rastogi, S., Rawal, A., Bhimavarapu, V. M., Kanoujiya, J., & Rastogi, S. (2022). Financial Technology and Its Impact on Digital Literacy in India: Using Poverty as a Moderating Variable. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070311 Go to original source...
    16. Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega Rather than Cronbach's Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629 Go to original source...
    17. Hellin, J., Lundy, M., & Meijer, M. (2009). Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso-America. Food Policy, 34(1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.003 Go to original source...
    18. Hirzalla, F., Van Zoonen, L., & De Ridder, J. (2011). Internet Use and Political Participation: Reflections on the Mobilization/Normalization Controversy. The Information Society, 27(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.534360 Go to original source...
    19. Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A Comparative Analysis of The Relation Between Political Trust And Forms of Political Participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.692807 Go to original source...
    20. Hu, X., Chen, Z., Chen, X., & Liu, Z. (2023). The political trust impacts of land titling in China. Land Use Policy, 129, 106656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106656 Go to original source...
    21. Huszák, L., & Gittins, T. (2022). Understanding the Budapest Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Human Capital Flows and Social Capital Ties. Central European Business Review, 11(3), 97-125. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.295 Go to original source...
    22. Chakraborty, U., & Biswal, S. K. (2023). Is Digital Social Communication Effective for Social Relationship? A Study of Online Brand Communities. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2023.2219589 Go to original source...
    23. Junquera, V., Rubenstein, D. I., Grêt-Regamey, A., & Knaus, F. (2022). Structural change in agriculture and farmers' social contacts: Insights from a Swiss mountain region. Agricultural Systems, 200, 103435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103435 Go to original source...
    24. Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Sarathy, R., & Murphy, F. (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9268-5 Go to original source...
    25. Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475-507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475 Go to original source...
    26. López-Felices, B., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., & Mesa-Vázquez, E. (2023). Farmers' profiles and attitudes towards the implementation of rainwater harvesting systems in intensive agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 21(1), 2189402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2189402 Go to original source...
    27. Lu, H., Tong, P., & Zhu, R. (2020). Does Internet Use Affect Netizens' Trust in Government? Empirical Evidence from China. Social Indicators Research, 149(1), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02247-0 Go to original source...
    28. Lu, J., Qi, L., & Yu, X. (2019). Political trust in the internet context: A comparative study in 36 countries. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.003 Go to original source...
    29. Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Shvets, G., Garmatiuk, O., & Tamoąiūnienė, R. (2021). Green Economy in Sustainable Development and Improvement of Resource Efficiency. Central European Business Review, 10(1), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.252 Go to original source...
    30. Miller, A. H., & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 357-386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400005883 Go to original source...
    31. Mundy, P., Sigman, M., Ungerer, J., & Sherman, T. (1986). Defining The Social Deficits of Autism: The Contribution of Non-Verbal Communication Measures. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27(5), 657-669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1986.tb00190.x Go to original source...
    32. Neogi, A. S., Garg, K. A., Mishra, R. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Sentiment analysis and classification of Indian farmers' protest using Twitter data. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 1(2), 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100019 Go to original source...
    33. Ofori, M., & El-Gayar, O. (2021). Drivers and challenges of precision agriculture: A social media perspective. Precision Agriculture, 22(3), 1019-1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09760-0 Go to original source...
    34. Papadopoulos, S., Karelakis, C., Zafeiriou, E., & Koutroumanidis, Th. (2015). Going sustainable or conventional? Evaluating the CAP's impacts on the implementation of sustainable forms of agriculture in Greece. Land Use Policy, 47, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.005 Go to original source...
    35. Ross, A., & Willson, V. L. (2017). Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analysis Using at Least Two Sets of Variables (In Two Blocks). In A. Ross & V. L. Willson, Basic and Advanced Statistical Tests (s. 61-74). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-086-8_10 Go to original source...
    36. Schneider, I. (2017). Can We Trust Measures of Political Trust? Assessing Measurement Equivalence in Diverse Regime Types. Social Indicators Research, 133(3), 963-984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1400-8 Go to original source...
    37. Schoon, I., & Cheng, H. (2011). Determinants of political trust: A lifetime learning model. Developmental Psychology, 47(3), 619-631. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021817 Go to original source...
    38. Specht, A. R., & Rutherford, T. (2013). Agriculture at Eleven: Visual Rhetoric and News Media Portrayals of Agriculture. Journal of Applied Communications, 97(4). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1130 Go to original source...
    39. Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial Orientation and New Venture Performance: The Moderating Role of Intra- and Extraindustry Social Capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.30744031 Go to original source...
    40. Svendsen, G. T. (2011). Evaluating and Regulating the Impacts of Lobbying in the EU? The Case Study of Green Industries: Lobbying in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.567 Go to original source...
    41. Tahal, R., & Formánek, T. (2022). Environmental Stances and Lifestyle Preferences in Czechia: Generational Aspects and Socio-Demographic Implications. Central European Business Review, 11(5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.305 Go to original source...
    42. Thomas, B., Sparkes, A., Brooksbank, D., & Williams, R. (2004). Internet Adoption by Farmers' Markets and Small Farming Enterprises in South-East Wales. Outlook on Agriculture, 33(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000004322877764 Go to original source...
    43. Ugur-Cinar, M., Cinar, K., & Kose, T. (2020). How Does Education Affect Political Trust?: An Analysis of Moderating Factors. Social Indicators Research, 152(2), 779-808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02463-z Go to original source...
    44. Valaskova, K., Gajdosikova, D., & Pavic Kramaric, T. (2022). How Important Is the Business Environment for The Performance of Enterprises? Case Study of Selected European Countries. Central European Business Review, 11(4), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.300 Go to original source...
    45. Veidal, A., & Flaten, O. (2014). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Farm Business Performance: The Moderating Role of On-Farm Diversification and Location. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 15(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.5367/ijei.2014.0147 Go to original source...
    46. Vrolijk, H., & Poppe, K. (2020). Impact of off-farm income and paid taxes on the composition and volatility of incomes and wealth of dairy farmers in the Netherlands. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 122(2), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.2046 Go to original source...
    47. Wei, S., & Lu, Y. (2023). How Does Internet Use Affect the Farmers' Trust in Local Government: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3489. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043489 Go to original source...
    48. Xu, P., Ye, Y., & Zhang, M. (2022). Exploring the effects of traditional media, social media, and foreign media on hierarchical levels of political trust in China. Global Media and China, 7(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364221115270 Go to original source...
    49. Zhou, D., Deng, W., & Wu, X. (2020). Impacts of Internet Use on Political Trust: New Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(14), 3235-3251. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1644161 Go to original source...
    50. Zmerli, S. (2014). Political Trust. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (s. 4887-4889). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2202 Go to original source...
    51. Zmerli, S., & Castillo, J. C. (2015). Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America. Social Science Research, 52, 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.003 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content