D83 - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; UnawarenessReturn

Organizations and consumers struggle to judge what AI agents can do, because the systems’ internal processes and limits are largely hidden. Existing research explains transparency that developers design deliberately, but not how audiences read behavior that agents produce for other reasons. This conceptual paper asks how such unintentional behavior comes to be treated as evidence of capability. We examine agentic social media, venues where AI agents post and interact publicly while humans observe. Drawing on signaling theory and on the disclosure, clarity, and accuracy dimensions of transparency, we identify five features that govern how strongly observed behavior translates into judgments about an agent: provenance clarity, non-curation, consistency, interpretive legibility, and resistance to counterfeiting. Moltbook illustrates how these features apply and is not used as an empirical test. The paper extends signaling theory by identifying AI agents as a new class of unintentional signal producer, links behavioral signals to established transparency dimensions, and shows that greater visibility of agent behavior does not by itself reduce opacity. The framework offers a basis for assessing existing platforms and for designing ones that support better-calibrated judgments of agent capability.
Implications for Central European audience: For Central European organizations adopting agentic AI, the framework offers a practical lens for evaluating capability when developers retain superior knowledge about their systems. Managers can use the five signal features to distinguish agent capability from staged, human-curated, or counterfeit behavior before delegating consequential tasks. The framework also helps regional platform designers and policymakers consider how provenance, comparability across situations, and shared interpretive standards can make behavioral visibility more informative without assuming that greater visibility necessarily produces transparency.

Political trust is an important indicator for evaluating relations between politicians and stakeholders. In agriculture, political trust has not been researched in depth, although agriculture is highly regulated by policies related to access to resources. This paper addresses this knowledge gap by answering the question of the role of institutionalized and non-institutionalized social communication in shaping farm workers' political trust. The multiple regression on a sample of 1,016 farm workers from the Europe-wide 2020 European Social Survey yields new insights. A key finding is the moderating effect of the opinion that online communication channels expose people to misinformation on the relationship between farm workers' trust in politics as a dependent variable and frequency of social contacts, time spent monitoring politics and current affairs, and membership in professional associations. In addition, political trust was found to increase as farm workers' interest in politics and monitoring news about politics and current affairs increased. While political trust is positively associated with farm workers' institutionalized participation in professional associations, it is negatively associated with non-institutionalized networking. Confirmation bias associated with farm workers' networking is particularly risky. Another important finding is lower political trust among households with a subjectively worse financial situation.
Implications for Central European audience: Government, formal networks (professional associations), and informal networks (social networks) provide verified and trustworthy information. At the same time, farmers themselves should have sufficient information literacy to critically assess the credibility of the information. The farm worker's education plays an important role and is significantly related to most of the main effects. The study's conclusions also include suggestions for follow-up research.

The aim of this paper is to describe the outsourcing of marketing communications as a business trend. The author discusses possible scopes of external entities' involvement and presents positive and negative aspects of marketing communications outsourcing. Efficient use of modern forms of marketing communication is the domain of a highly specialized group of agencies and other providers of marketing services. The use of their creativity, competence and skills in the field of communication has a significant impact on its effectiveness. For many companies, it is currently more profitable to benefit from external specialists instead of hiring them and improving their competence within the organization. This solution also seems more beneficial with respect to the effectiveness of management and optimization of resources. However, given the importance of the brand as a company's most crucial intangible asset of strategic importance, delegating all decision-making power associated with it beyond the company is irrational. The choice of strategies and determination of key assumptions relating to integrated marketing communication should remain the responsibility of the parent company.