Central European Business Review 2021, 10(2):1-20 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.282

Macroeconomic Trends among Visegrád Countries, EU Balkans, and the U.S., 1991-2021

Max Gillman ORCID...1
1 University of Missouri—St. Louis, Department of Economics, St. Louis, United States of America, gillmanm@umsl.edu

The paper provides an introduction to the special issue. It shows a sense in which Visegrád and Balkan EU countries are correlated in macroeconomic performance and integrated with the global business cycles. Using inflation rate levels as a starting point to characterize when these countries began their transitions, it shows that after 1996 both real GDP growth and real interest rates move together to a significant degree both with each other and with the US. This provides a background from which to view the paths since the collapse of the Soviet Union that these transition economies have taken. In addition, comparison is made to US money and banking policy, to provide an outline of how this may impact progress in the transition region. A subsequent summary of the other articles in the issue shows an inter-relation in their themes about how Central, Eastern, and Southeast Europe have progressed since 1991, and how these paths may be affected by Western economic policy.
Implications for Central European audience: The paper shows that transition regions can be impacted by international financial integration, including to possible detriment when capital markets are regulated by policy that pushes real interest rates below their natural levels. Negative real interest rate policy since the 2008-2009 financial crisis and again during the Covid crisis may hasten the rise of autocratic democracy and limit social, political, and economic freedom.

Keywords: transition countries; business cycles; real GDP growth rates; inflation rates; real bond interest rates
JEL classification: E31, E32, E44, P26, P33, P44, P51

Received: April 30, 2021; Revised: May 5, 2021; Accepted: May 27, 2021; Prepublished online: May 27, 2021; Published: June 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gillman, M. (2021). Macroeconomic Trends among Visegrád Countries, EU Balkans, and the U.S., 1991-2021. Central European Business Review, 10(2), 1-20. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.282
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Backus, D. K., Kehoe, Patrick, J., & Kydland, F. E. (1992). International Real Business Cycles. Journal of Political Economy, 100(4), 745-775. Go to original source...
    2. Bokros, L. (2013). Accidental occidental: Economics and culture of transition in Mitteleuropa, the Baltic and the Balkan Area. Central European Press. Go to original source...
    3. Burdekin, R. C., Mitchener, K. J., & Weidenmier, M. D. (2012). Irving Fisher and Price-Level Targeting in Austria: Was Silver the Answer?. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44(4), 733-750. Go to original source...
    4. Csabafi, T. Z., Gillman, M., & Naraidoo, R. (2019). International business cycle and financial intermediation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 51(8), 2293-2303. Go to original source...
    5. Czech National Bank. (2000). Inflation Targeting in the Czech Republic - Chapter VII in Inflation Targeting in Transition Economies: The Case of the Czech Republic. Edited by Warren Coats, CNB and IMF, March.
    6. Dimand, R. W., & Gomez Betancourt, R. (2012). Retrospectives: Irving Fisher's Appreciation and Interest (1896) and the Fisher Relation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), 185-96. Go to original source...
    7. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FRED; https://fred.stlouisfed.org
    8. Fisher, I. (1896). Appreciation and Interest. Publications of the American Economic Association, First Series, 11(4), 1.110 [331.442], and as Appreciation and Interest, New York: Macmillan, 1896.
    9. Fisher, I. (1913). A compensated dollar. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 27(2), 213-235. Go to original source...
    10. Gillman M. (2020). The welfare cost of inflation with banking time. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 20(1), 1-20. Go to original source...
    11. Gillman, M., & Nakov, A. (2004). Granger causality of the inflation-growth mirror in accession countries. Economics of Transition, 12(4), 653-681. Go to original source...
    12. Gillman, M. K., & Yerokhin, O. (2005). Ramsey-Friedman optimality with banking time. Topics in Macroeconomics, 5(1), 1-24. Go to original source...
    13. Horská, H. (2002). Inflation targeting in Poland, a comparison with the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers, 11(3), 237-254; https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.196. Go to original source...
    14. Krušec, D. (2011). Is inflation targeting effective? Monetary transmission in Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary. Eastern European Economics, 49(1), 52-71. Go to original source...
    15. Lucas Jr, R. E., & Stokey, N. L. (1983). Optimal fiscal and monetary policy in an economy without capital. Journal of monetary Economics, 12(1), 55-93. Go to original source...
    16. Schaechter, A., Stone, M. R., & Zelmer, M. (2000). Adopting inflation targeting: Practical issues for emerging market countries. International Monetary Fund.
    17. Soros, G. (1990). Opening the Soviet System. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content