Central European Business Review 2019, 8(5):36-53 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.225

Tax Deductibility of Interest under the ATAD in Investment Decisions

Irena Stejskalová1, Petra Kozáková2, Jana Pevná3
1 University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of Management, stejskai@fm.vse.cz
2 University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of Management, petra.kozakova@fm.vse.cz
3 University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of Management, pevnaja@fm.vse.cz

In 2019, the Czech Republic implemented some of the provisions under Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164, also called the ATAD (Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive). Since then, professionals in the field have been following the impact of this directive on tax legislation and accounting. However, this paper aims to show that in addition to the tax rates and the profit after tax, the ATAD will also impact financial management, specifically investment decision-making. The paper analyses a model situation based on the implementation of these regulatory measures and focuses on the effects of the new EU legislation on the interest tax shield and the overall borrowing costs. The methodology used in the paper is described in more detail in section 2 (“research commentary”) and is based on comparing the net present value of an investment financed with debt capital before and after the ATAD implementation. The calculations use the accounting data of an existing company including information that is not available to the public. This example is used to demonstrate the point by calculating the net present value with regard to the impact of the interest tax shield based on the method of financing. The calculations in the paper follow the applicable rules used in the Czech Republic before and after the ATAD came into force. The results confirm that the net present value (NPV) of investments have decreased. Due to the default parameters set for the calculation, the results also show a comparable decrease in the NPV when the investment is financed with debt capital. With comparable conditions and initial parameters (i.e. zero down payment and identical borrowing costs), the decrease in the NPV is higher when the investment is financed with a bank loan. The analysis shows that investment planning under the new legislation will be more complex and will have to take into account the financial results of the whole firm and whether the borrowing costs are tax deductible. All in all, this analysis suggests that economic calculations have to focus more on the details and the wider context of the tax deductibility of interest.

Keywords: borrowing costs, financing, interest limitation, investment, tax shield
JEL classification: G31, K20, M20

Received: June 21, 2019; Revised: August 30, 2019; Accepted: November 6, 2019; Prepublished online: January 20, 2020; Published: January 30, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Stejskalová, I., Kozáková, P., & Pevná, J. (2019). Tax Deductibility of Interest under the ATAD in Investment Decisions. Central European Business Review, 8(5), 36-53. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.225
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Asquith, P., & Weiss, L. A. (2016). Lessons in corporate finance: a case studies approach to financial tools, financial policies and valuation. Hoboken: Wiley. Go to original source...
    2. Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2017). Principles of corporate finance (12th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
    3. Brigham, E. F., Ehrhardt, M. C., & Fox, R. (2016). Financial management: theory & practice (EMEA edition). Andover: Cengage Learning.
    4. Buettner, T., Overesch, M., Schreiber, U., & Wamser, G. (2012). The impact of thin-capitalization rules on the capital structure of multinational firms. Journal of Public Economics, 96(11), 930-938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.06.008. Go to original source...
    5. Commission Notice. (2018). Measures considered equally effective to Article 4 of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. Commission Notice (2018/C 441/01) Official Journal of the European Union. C 441/1.
    6. Egger, P., Eggert, W., Keuschnigg, C., & Winner, H. (2010). Corporate taxation, debt financing and foreign-plant ownership. European Economic Review, 54(1), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.06.007. Go to original source...
    7. Fotr, J., & Souček, I. (2011). Investiční rozhodování a řízení projektů: jak připravovat, financovat a hodnotit projekty, řídit jejich riziko a vytvářet portfolio projektů (1. vyd.). Praha: Grada Publishing.
    8. Gitman, L. J., & Zutter, C. J. (2015). Principles of managerial finance (14th edition). Boston: Pearson.
    9. Graham, J. R. (2003). Taxes and Corporate Finance: A Review. The Review of Financial Studies, 16(4), 1075-1129, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1262738?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents. Go to original source...
    10. Graham, J. R. (2005). A Review of Taxes and Corporate Finance. Foundations and Trends® in Finance, 1(7), 573-691. https://doi.org/10.1561/0500000010. Go to original source...
    11. Halíček, R. (2010). Nízká kapitalizace z pohledu daňového práva. (Rigorózní práce). Univerzita Karlova v Praze. https://is.cuni.cz/webapps/zzp/detail/85434.
    12. Haufler, A., & Runkel, M. (2012). Firms' financial choices and thin capitalization rules under corporate tax competition. European Economic Review, 56(6), 1087-1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.03.005. Go to original source...
    13. Huizinga, H., Laeven, L., & Nicodeme, G. (2008). Capital structure and international debt shifting. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(1), 80-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.006. Go to original source...
    14. Income Tax Act (No. 586/1992). https://aplikace.mvcr.cz/sbirka-zakonu/SearchResult.aspx?q=586/1992&typeLaw=zakon&what=Cislo_zakona_smlouvy.
    15. Keen, M., Klemm, A., & Perry, V. (2010). Tax and the Crisis*. Fiscal Studies, 31(1), 43-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2010.00107.x. Go to original source...
    16. Knauer, T., & Sommer, F. (2012). Interest barrier rules as a response to highly leveraged transactions: Evidence from the 2008 German business tax reform. Review of Accounting and Finance, 11(2), 206-232. Go to original source...
    17. Kubicová, J. (2018). The Anti-Tax-Avoidance Measures in the EU - from Denials to Wide Acceptance. In: European Financial Systems 2018. 15th International Scientific Conference 25th-26th June 2018. Brno: Masaryk University, pp. 348-354.
    18. MacKie-Mason, J. K. (1990). Do Taxes Affect Corporate Financing Decisions? The Journal of Finance, 45(5), 1471-1493. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328746. Go to original source...
    19. Møen, J., Schindler, D., Schjelderup, G., Tropina, J., Møen, J., Schindler, D., … Tropina, J. (2011). International Debt Shifting: Do Multinationals Shift Internal or External Debt? http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.710.4392&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
    20. OECD. (2015). Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments, Action 4 2015 Final Report, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264241176-en. Go to original source...
    21. OECD. (2016). Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments, Action 4 - 2016 Update: Inclusive Framework on BEPS. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268333-en. Go to original source...
    22. Osička, Š. & Hrubý, Š. (2018). Nová pravidla po daňovou uznatelnost úroků - Publikace | Fučík & Partners. Získáno 21. březen 2019, https://www.fucik.cz/publikace/nova-pravidla-po-danovou-uznatelnost-uroku/.
    23. Pilařová, I., & Pekárek, A. (2016). Nízká kapitalizace | DU profi. Retrieved on March 29, 2019, from https://www.du.cz/33/nizka-kapitalizace-uniqueidmRRWSbk196FNf8-jVUh4EmtBL-kb09JE-YQ1PrJRretZwRYsMFH_3w/.
    24. Schmid, N. (2019). Interest Limitation Rule of ATAD Not Implemented - Tax - Austria. Retrieved on March 29, 2019, from: http://www.mondaq.com/Austria/x/772942/withholding+tax/Interest+Limitation+Rule+Of+ATAD+Not+Implemented.
    25. Schmidt, K., & Moesle, E. (2018). Germany - Other corporate tax issues. Retrieved on March 29, 2019, from Pricewatehgouse Coopers website: http://taxsummaries.pwc.com/uk/taxsummaries/wwts.nsf/ID/Germany-Corporatmnnnne-Other-issues.
    26. Sommerhalder, R. A. (1996). Approaches to Thin Capitalisation. European Taxation, 36(3). International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation. Amsterdam 1996, s. 87.
    27. Tell, M. (2017). Interest Limitation Rules in the Post-BEPS Era. Intertax, 45(11), 750-763. Go to original source...
    28. Vondrušková, L. (2018). Daňové a účetní aspekty úvěrových finančních nástrojů. (Master Thesis). Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze. https://insis.vse.cz/zp/portal_zp.pl?podrobnosti_zp=63239.
    29. Zelinková, R. (2018). Nová pravidla daňové uznatelnosti nákladových úroků a jejich dopad na obchodní společnosti. (Master Thesis). Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze. https://insis.vse.cz/zp/portal_zp.pl?podrobnosti_zp=62694.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content