Central European Business Review 2017, 6(1):77-91 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.174

Czech Cultural Standards from the Perspective of the Top Management of German Companies

Karel Kňap1, Ivan Nový2
1 Ing. Karel Kňap, MBA, Ph.D. student, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, Prague, nam. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67, Prague 3, qknak00@vse.cz
2 prof. Ing. Ivan Nový, CSc., Dean, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, Prague, nam. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67, Prague 3, ivan.novy@vse.cz

The goal of article is to analyze the analytical tools applied in the identification of national cultures and to identify and schematically express these Czech cultural standards, which are perceived most strongly by Germans when dealing with Czechs in higher-middle management. The article consists of a review of the related literature extended by a polemic on the applicability of the models. The authors conducted qualitative research based on semi-standardized interviews with ten German managers who grew up in the territory of former West Germany and had worked in the Czech Republic in international corporations for a period of at least two years. The results present three propositions connected to the most perceived cultural standards of Czech managers: propensity for improvisation, avoidance of conflict, and rejection of hierarchical structures.

Keywords: management; cultural standards; Czech Republic; Germany
JEL classification: M12, M14

Received: December 15, 2016; Revised: February 16, 2017; Published: March 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kňap, K., & Nový, I. (2017). Czech Cultural Standards from the Perspective of the Top Management of German Companies. Central European Business Review6(1), 77-91. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.174
Download citation

References

  1. Bedrnová, E., & Nový, I. (2009). Psychologie a sociologie řízení. Prague: Management Press.
  2. Beugelsdijk, S., Maseland, R., & van Hoorn, A. (2015). Are Scores on Hofstede's Dimensions of National Culture Stable over Time? A Cohort Analysis. Global Strategy Journal, 5 Go to original source...
  3. Demorgon, J. (1989). L'exploration interculturelle. Pour une Pédagogie internationale. Paris: Colin.
  4. Fink, G., Nový, I., & Schroll-Machl, S. (2001). Tschechische, österreichische und deutsche Kulturstandards in der Wirtschaftskooperation. Journal for East European Management Studies, 5(4). Go to original source...
  5. Gupta, V., & Hanges, P. J. (2004). Regional and Climate Clustering of Societal Cultures. In House, R. et al. (Eds.), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  6. Hall, E. T. (1985). Hidden Differences: Studies in International Communication. Hamburg: Gruner & Jahn.
  7. Hall, E. T. (1990). Understanding cultural differences. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
  8. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  9. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational dynamics, 16(4), 5-21. Go to original source...
  10. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  11. Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill USA, 2010
  12. Hofstede, G. (2016) Cultural standards. Retrieved March 20, 2016 from http://geert-hofstede.com.
  13. Hospodářské vztahy (2016). Česko-německé vztahy [Czech-German relations]. Retrieved March 20, 2016 from http://tschechien.ahk.de/cz/o-nemecku/cesko-nemecke-vztahy.
  14. House, R. J., Wright, N. S., & Aditia, R. N. (1999). Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and proposed theory, In Earley, P. C, & Erez, M. (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organisational psychology. San Francisco: New Lexington
  15. Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2014). A replication of Hofstede's uncertainty avoidance dimension across nationally representative samples from Europe. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 14(2), 161-171. Go to original source...
  16. de Mooij, M. (2013). On the misuse and misinterpretation of dimensions of national culture. International Marketing Review, 30(3), 253-261. Go to original source...
  17. Nový, I., & Schroll-Machl, S. (2005). Spolupráce přes hranice kultur. Prague: Management Press.
  18. Nový, I., & Schroll-Machl, S. (2007). Interkulturní komunikace v řízení a podnikání: Česko-německá. Prague: Management Press.
  19. Nový, I., & Schroll-Machl, S. (2015). Interkulturní komunikace: Češi a němci. Prague: Management Press.
  20. Reber, G., Auer-Rizzi, W., & Maly, M. (2004). The behaviour of managers in Austria and the Czech Republic: an intercultural comparison based on the Vroom/Yetton model of leadership and decision making. Journal for East European Management Studies, 9(4), 411-429. Go to original source...
  21. Schmitz, L., & Weber, W. (2014). Are Hofstede's dimensions valid? A test for measurement invariance of uncertainty avoidance. Interculture journal: Online-Zeitschrift für Interkulturelle Studien, 13(22), 11-26.
  22. Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees a dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 27(2), 231-264. Go to original source...
  23. Thomas, A. (1996). Psychologische Wirksamkeit von Kulturstandards im interkulturellen Handlen. In Thomas, A. (Ed.), Psychologie des interkulturellen Handelns, Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  24. Thomas, A. (2001). Intercultural Training is culture specific interaction process. Journal for East European Management Studies, 5(4). Go to original source...
  25. Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. London: The Economist Books.
  26. Venaik, S., & Brewer, P. (2013). Critical issues in the Hofstede and GLOBE national culture models. International Marketing Review, 30(5), 469-482. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.