Central European Business Review 2017, 6(1):26-47 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.171

Intercultural Variations in Personal Sales Factors in the Czech and U.S. Automotive Markets: Practical Implications for Marketing

David Øíha1, Timothy Heinze2, Michael Stros3
1 David Øíha, Assistant Professor of Sales and Marketing, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic, david.riha@vse.cz
2 Timothy Heinze, Executive Director of the Professional Sales Program, Associate Professor of Marketing, College of Business, California State University, Chico, tcheinze@csuchico.edu
3 Michael Stros, Head of Marketing Group, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Fernfachhochschule Schweiz, Brig, Switzerland, michael.stros@ffhs.ch

The purpose of this paper is to determine the intercultural and gender differences between American and Czech customers in relation to their perceptions of the verbal and nonverbal personality characteristics of a salesperson during the personal sales process. This research provides scholars and practitioners with an understanding of the cultural and gender-specific personal interaction factors that should be addressed when designing effective interpersonal sales approaches. The study utilized an experimental design approach. Personal selling scenarios were filmed and shown to respondents (university students acting as potential customers) who completed a survey regarding sales effectiveness. The resulting data was factor analyzed and a conceptual personal sales model was developed. The model suggests that salesperson authenticity and personal interaction factors impact sales success in both the U.S. and the Czech Republic. However, there are variations in the receptivity of potential U.S. and Czech customers to specific interpersonal communication factors. Gender-based variations were also identified. The study focused on automotive retail sales scenarios in the United States; however, the results can be generalized to similar markets.

Keywords: personal sales; personality of sales representative; intercultural differences; gender
JEL classification: M1, M16, M3, M31

Received: August 31, 2016; Revised: January 15, 2017; Published: March 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Øíha, D., Heinze, T., & Stros, M. (2017). Intercultural Variations in Personal Sales Factors in the Czech and U.S. Automotive Markets: Practical Implications for Marketing. Central European Business Review6(1), 26-47. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.171
Download citation

References

  1. Ahearne, M., Gruen, T. W., & Burke-Jarvis, C. (1999). If looks could sell: Moderation and mediation of the attractiveness effect on salesperson performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(4), 269-284. Go to original source...
  2. Algera, P. M., & Lips-Wiersma, M. (2012). Radical authentic leadership: Co-creating the conditions under which all members of the organization can be authentic. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 118-131. Go to original source...
  3. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behaviour and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 431-441. Go to original source...
  4. Ambady, N., Krabbenhoft, M., & Hogan, D. (2006). The 30-Sec sale: Using thin-slice judgments to evaluate sales effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 4-13. Go to original source...
  5. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 801-823. Go to original source...
  6. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L, Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801-823. Go to original source...
  7. Bakeman, R. (2000). Behavioral observations and coding. In H. T. Reis & C. K. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1998). Carl Rogers' helping system: Journey and substance. London: Sage. Go to original source...
  9. Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77-85. Go to original source...
  10. Bauer, J. (2002). Das gedächtnis des körpers - wie beziehungen und lebensstile unsere gene steuern. Frankfurt: Eichborn.
  11. Bedrnová, E., & Nový, I. (2007). Psychologie a sociologie øízení. Prague: Management Press.
  12. Bethell, E. J., Vick, S., & Bard, K. A. (2007). Measurement of eye-gaze in chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology, 69(5), 562-575. Go to original source...
  13. Bortz, J., & Doering, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und evaluation, Vol. 4, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Go to original source...
  14. Bowker, A., Boekhoven, B., Nolan, A., Bauhaus, S., Glover, P., Powell, T., & Taylor, S. (2009). Naturalistic observations of spectator behavior at youth hockey games. The Sport Psychologist, 23(1), 301-316. Go to original source...
  15. Busha, A. J., Smart, D., & Nicholsa, E. N. (2002). Pursuing the concept of marketing productivity Introduction to the JBR Special Issue on Marketing Productivity. Journal of Business Research, 55(5), 343-347. Go to original source...
  16. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 1(2), 245-76. Go to original source...
  17. Child, D. (1990). The essentials of factor analysis. 2nd ed. London: Cassel Educational Limited.
  18. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
  19. Crick, N. R., Ostrov, J.M., Burr, J.E., Jansen-Yeh, E.A., Cullerton-Sen, C., & Ralston, P. (2006). A longitudinal study of relational and physical aggression in preschool. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 254-268. Go to original source...
  20. Damásio, A. R., Damásio, H., & van Straten, G. (1996). Neurobiology of decision-making. Berlin: Springer. Go to original source...
  21. Diddams, M., & Chang, G. C. (2012). Only human: Exploring the nature of weakness in authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 593-603. Go to original source...
  22. Erevelles, S., & Fukawa, N. (2013). The role of affect in personal selling and sales management. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 18(1), 7-24. Go to original source...
  23. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. Go to original source...
  24. Freud, S. (1938). Abriss der psychoanalyse. Frankfurt: Fischer.
  25. Gorsuch, R. L. (2015). Factor analysis. New York: Psychology Press and Routledge Classic Editions. Go to original source...
  26. Gudykunst, W. B. (2004). Bridging Differences: Effective Intergroup Communication, 4th. ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. Go to original source...
  27. Hair J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
  28. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor'.
  29. Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. (1990). Understanding cultural differences. 1st ed. Boston: Intercultural Press.
  30. Hampden-Turner, F., & Trompenaars, C. (1999). Riding the waves of culture: understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publications.
  31. Havlena, W. J., & Holbrook, M. B. (1986). The varieties of consumption experience: Comparing two typologies of emotion in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(3), 394-404. Go to original source...
  32. Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393-416. Go to original source...
  33. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8. Go to original source...
  34. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-85. Go to original source...
  35. Huck, S. W. (2012). Reading statistics and research. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  36. Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200. Go to original source...
  37. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401-415. Go to original source...
  38. Kaiser, H. F., & Mark, I. V. (1974). Little jiffy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111-117. Go to original source...
  39. Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1-26. Go to original source...
  40. Kieffer, K. M. (1999). An introductory primer on the appropriate use of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Research in Schools, 6(2), 75-92.
  41. Kolman, L., Noorderhaven, N. G., Hofstede, G., & Dienes, E. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in Central Europe. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(1), 76-88. Go to original source...
  42. Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago, Illinois: Aldine-Atherton.
  43. Meloun, M., & Militký, J. (2006). Kompendium statistického zpracování dat: metody a øe¹ené úlohy, Praha: Academia.
  44. Neider, L. L., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2011). The authentic leadership inventory (ALI): Development and empirical tests. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1146-1164. Go to original source...
  45. Nock, M. K., & Kurtz, S. (2005). Direct behavioral observation in school settings: Bringing science to practice. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 12(3), 359-370. Go to original source...
  46. Norderhaven, N., Hofstede, G., & Dienes, E. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in Central Europe, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(1/2), 76-88. Go to original source...
  47. Nový, I., & Schroll-Machl, S. (2003). Interkulturní komunikace v øízení a podnikání, Prague: Management Press.
  48. Nový, I., & Schroll-Machl, S. (2005). Spolupráce pøes hranice kultur. 1st edition, Prague: Management Press.
  49. Ort, A., Krines, V., & Veselý, Z. (2002). Zahranièní politika Èeské republiky, Prague: Oeconomica.
  50. Ostrov J. M., & Keating, C. F. (2004). Gender differences in preschool aggression during free play and structured interactions: An observational study. Social Development, 13(2), 255-277. Go to original source...
  51. Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
  52. Pellegrini, A. D. (2004). Observing children in their natural worlds: A methodological primer. 2nd. Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  53. Pett, M., Lackey, N. & Sullivan, J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Go to original source...
  54. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19(2), 123-189. Go to original source...
  55. Plouffe, C. R., Williams, B., & Wacliner, T. (2008). Navigating difficult waters: Publishing trends and scholarship in sales research. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28(1), 79-92. Go to original source...
  56. Randall, E. J. (1990). Review of salesperson selection techniques and criteria: A managerial approach. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 7(2-3), 81-96. Go to original source...
  57. Rego, A., Sousa, F. Marques, C., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2011). Authentic leadership promoting employees'psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 429-437. Go to original source...
  58. Samovar, L. A., & Porter, R. E. (2003). Intercultural communication: A reader, 10th ed. Wadsworth: Belmont.
  59. Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (2002). Marketing productivity Issues and analysis. Journal of Business Research, 55(5), 349-362. Go to original source...
  60. Solomon, M., Bamossy, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). Konsumentenverhalten - Der europäische markt. New Jersey: Pearson.
  61. Stewart, E. C., & Benett, M. J. (1991). American cultural patterns: a cross-cultural perspective. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
  62. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
  63. Tate, B. (2009). A longitudinal study of the relationships among self-monitoring, authentic leadership, and perceptions of leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15(1), 16-29. Go to original source...
  64. Swisher, L. L, Beckstead, J. W., & Bebeau, M. J. (2004). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis using a professional role orientation inventory as an example. Physical Therapy, 84(9), 784-799. Go to original source...
  65. Thompson B., & Daniel, L.G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(2), 197-208. Go to original source...
  66. Tucker, L. R., & MacCallum, R.C. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis. Unpublished manuscript.
  67. Walumbwa, F. O., Hui Wang, P. W., Schaubroeck, J., & Avolio, B. J. (2010). Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 901-914. Go to original source...
  68. Wiemann, J. M. (1977). Explication and test of a model of communicative competence. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 195-213. Go to original source...
  69. Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the authenticity scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3), 385-399. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.