Central European Business Review X:X | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.412

Impact of Carbon Emissions as Anti-ESG Factor on the Performance of Financial Markets in China

Monika Matušovičová, Sandra Matušovičová
University of Economics in Bratislava, Faculty of Commerce






The article researches the impact of anti-ESG factors on financial markets in China and its consequences for the countries of Central Europe. In this connection, the specific aim of the article was to analyze whether CO2 emissions, as the main factor against ESG concept, negatively affect the return of stock and bond investments in the extreme environment of the world's largest producer of emissions - China. The multiple linear regression (MLR) model method was used for explaining the investment return according to Khan’s and Long’s model specification, applied on annual data for investment horizon from 1991 to 2023. The results at the 5% level of significance (p < 0.05) surprisingly showed that emissions have a positive impact on Chinese stock prices (β = 0.079). This reflects that instead of environmental goals stock investors in China rather have a preference for economic growth, for which China's emission-intensive industry is crucial. On the other hand, ESG-related issues have a slightly negative impact on bonds (β = -0.031), which emphasizes the greater importance of environmental factors for fixed income investments. Overall, the research offers valuable insights into the complex relationship between CO2 emissions, investment performance and investor sentiment in China, which may have significant implications for other countries subject to strict ESG regulations, as well as the potential to use ESG strategies to increase the attractiveness of their financial markets.

Implications for Central European audience: Understanding the impact of CO2 emissions on Chinese financial markets, holds significant implications also for Central European countries, as ESG is at the forefront of EU regulatory framework. Particularly within the Visegrad 4 (V4) alliance, where industrial production in sectors like car manufacturing plays a crucial role in economy, finding a balance between economic growth and environmental responsibility is paramount. The article therefore implies that by integrating ESG in investment strategies, Central European countries can possibly enhance the attractiveness of their currently passive financial markets. At the same time the findings help societies as a whole, by emphasizing the financial benefits of building a more sustainable future.

Keywords: green finance; ESG investment; carbon management

Received: November 17, 2024; Revised: June 27, 2025; Accepted: August 19, 2025; Prepublished online: February 7, 2026 

Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Agliardi, E., Alexopoulos, T., & Karvelas, K. (2023). The environmental pillar of ESG and financial performance: A portfolio analysis. Energy Economics, 120: 106598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106598 Go to original source...
    2. Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451-4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043 Go to original source...
    3. Arefeen, S., & Shimada, K. (2020). Performance and Resilience of Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) and Conventional Funds during Different Shocks in 2016: Evidence from Japan. Sustainability, 12(2): 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020540 Go to original source...
    4. Benesty, J., Chen, J., Huang, Y., & Cohen, I. (2009). Pearson Correlation Coefficient. In: Noise Reduction in Speech Processing (pp. 37-40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5 Go to original source...
    5. Bloomberg. (2024). Rates & Bonds. Retrieved September 17, 2024, from https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds
    6. Busch, T., Bauer, R., & Orlitzky, M. (2015). Sustainable Development and Financial Markets: Old Paths and New Avenues: Old Paths and New Avenues. Business & Society, 55(3), 303-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315570701 Go to original source...
    7. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24037207 Go to original source...
    8. Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013, May). The performance frontier: Innovating for a sustainable strategy. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved November 9, 2024, from https://hbr.org/2013/05/the-performance-frontier-innovating-for-a-sustainable-strategy
    9. EDGAR - The Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. (2024). Emissions Data and Maps. Retrieved September 17, 2024, from https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/archived_datasets
    10. Eskander, S., & Fankhauser, S. (2023). The Impact of Climate Legislation on Trade-Related Carbon Emissions 1996-2018. Environmental and Resource Economics, 85, 167-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00762-w Go to original source...
    11. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2024). Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED). Retrieved September 17, 2024, from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/
    12. Flammer, C. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. The Academy of Management Journal, 56(3). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0744 Go to original source...
    13. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256324 Go to original source...
    14. Frati, G., Mazzacurati, J., & Alemanni, B. (2022). ESG Factors in the Investment Process. In N. Linciano, P. Soccorso, & C. Guagliano (Eds.), Information as a Driver of Sustainable Finance (pp. 147-177). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93768-3_6 Go to original source...
    15. Frydman, R., & Rapaczynski, A. (1993). Evolution and design in the East European transition. In M. Baldassarri, L. Paganetto, & E. S. Phelps (Eds.), Privatization Processes in Eastern Europe (pp. 63-103). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23090-7_5 Go to original source...
    16. Gafni, D., Palas, R., Baum, I., & Solomon, D. (2024). ESG Regulation and Financial Reporting Quality: Friends or Foes?. Finance Research Letters. 61: 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105017 Go to original source...
    17. Galema, R., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2008). The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially responsible investment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2646-2654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.06.002 Go to original source...
    18. Giese, G., Lee, L. E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2019.45.5.069 Go to original source...
    19. Green, F., & Stern, N. (2017). China's changing economy: implications for its carbon dioxide emissions. Climate Policy, 17(4), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1156515 Go to original source...
    20. Grewal, J., & Serafeim, G. (2020). Research on corporate sustainability: Review and directions for future research. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 14(2), 73-127. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000061 Go to original source...
    21. Hill, J. (2020). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Investing: A Balanced Analysis of the Theory and Practice of a Sustainable Portfolio. Academic Press.
    22. Hu, L., Hu, X., Li, B., Guo, L., Chen, D., Yang, Y., Ma, M., Li, X., Feng, R., & Fang, X. (2024). Carbon dioxide emissions from industrial processes and product use are a non-ignorable factor in China' s mitigation. Communications Earth & Environment, 5: 800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01951-1 Go to original source...
    23. Khan, M. A., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383 Go to original source...
    24. Khan, M. N., & Zaman, S. (2012). Impact of Macroeconomic Variables on Stock Prices: Empirical Evidence from Karachi Stock Exchange, Pakistan. In M. Zhu (Ed.), Business, Economics, Financial Sciences, and Management (pp. 227-233), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27966-9_32 Go to original source...
    25. Khue, P., Lee, J. & Park, H. (2022). The Effects of Carbon Emissions Trading on Environmental and Financial Performance: Evidence from Korean Listed Firms. SSRN. Retrieved September 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4101316 Go to original source...
    26. Kim, Y. H., & Park, J. R. (2021). The effect of environmental, social and governance (ESG) on capital cost: Evidence from Korean KOSPI firms. Journal of Next-generation Convergence Information Services Technology, 10(5), 513-521. https://doi.org/10.29056/jncist.2021.10.04 Go to original source...
    27. Le Quéré, C., Jackson, R. B., Jones, M. W., Smith, A. J. P., Abernethy, S., Andrew, R. M., De-Gol, A. J., Willis, D. R., Shan, Y., Canadell, J. G., Friedlingstein, P., Creutzig, F., & Peters, G. P. (2020). Temporary Reduction in Daily Global CO2 Emissions during the COVID-19 Forced Confinement, Nature Climate Change, 10, 647-653. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0797-x Go to original source...
    28. Lee, CC., Liu, F. & Shi, J. (2023). What impacts do green bonds have on carbon emissions and how? A dynamic spatial perspective in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 117981-117997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30014-9 Go to original source...
    29. Liu, C., Wang, S., Wei, K. C. J., & Zhong, N. (2019). The demand effect of yield-chasing retail investors: Evidence from the Chinese enterprise bond market. Journal of Empirical Finance, 50, 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.12.001 Go to original source...
    30. Long, W., Gao, J., Bai, K., & Lu, Z. (2024). A hybrid model for stock price prediction based on multi-view heterogeneous data. Financial Innovation, 10: 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00519-w Go to original source...
    31. Magyari, J. (2023). Decarbonization challenges and opportunities in the Central European energy sector: Implications for management. Society and Economy, 45(4), 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2023.00007 Go to original source...
    32. Mo, B., Li, Z. & Meng, J. (2021). The Dynamics of Carbon on Green Energy Equity Investment: Quantile-On-Quantile and Quantile Coherency Approaches. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 5912-5922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15647-y Go to original source...
    33. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2024). Statistical data - Yearbook. Retrieved September 17, 2024, from https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/Statisticaldata/yearbook/
    34. Nesta, L., Vona, F., & Nicolli, F. (2014). Environmental policies, competition and innovation in renewable energy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 67(3), 396-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.01.001 Go to original source...
    35. Nicolescu, L. & Tudorache, F.G. (2017). Capital markets in Central and Eastern Europe: two selected cases. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 11(1). 597-606. https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0064 Go to original source...
    36. Noh, J. H., & Park, H. (2023). Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Stock Market Volatility: An Empirical Analysis of OECD Countries. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 15(1), 58-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijccsm-10-2021-0124 Go to original source...
    37. Okajima, S., & Okajima, H. (2016). Impact of environmental regulation and the 2011 earthquake on the Japanese electricity industry. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 49, 223-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-016-9294-6 Go to original source...
    38. Ouchna, I. (2023). The impact of greenhouse gas emissions and green innovation on corporate investors' financial performance: A systematic review. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 4(2-1), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7827165 Go to original source...
    39. Ozili, P. K. (2022). Green finance research around the world: A review of literature. International Journal of Green Economics, 16(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGE.2022.10048432 Go to original source...
    40. Pucker, K. P., & King, A. (2022, August 1). ESG investing isn't designed to save the planet. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved September 11, 2024, from https://hbr.org/2022/08/esg-investing-isnt-designed-to-save-the-planet
    41. Read, C. (2023). Private sector ESG responsibilities and the environment pillar. In C. Read, Understanding sustainability principles and ESG policies: A multidisciplinary approach to public and corporate responses to climate change (pp. 337-351). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34483-1_23 Go to original source...
    42. Ren, X., Shi, Y. & Jin, C. (2022) Climate policy uncertainty and corporate investment: evidence from the Chinese energy industry. Carbon Neutrality, 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-022-00008-6 Go to original source...
    43. Schoenmaker, D., & Schramade, W. (2019). Principles of sustainable finance. Oxford University Press.
    44. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental Risk Management and the Cost of Capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569-592. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20142042 Go to original source...
    45. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(1), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005784421547 Go to original source...
    46. Stoerk, T., Dudek, D. & Yang, J. (2019). China's national carbon emissions trading scheme: lessons from the pilot emission trading schemes, academic literature, and known policy details. Climate Policy, 19(4), 472-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1568959 Go to original source...
    47. Wang, D., & Sun, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). Comparing the EU and Chinese carbon trading market operations and their spillover effects. Journal of Environmental Management, 351: 119795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119795 Go to original source...
    48. Wen, F., Zhao, L., He, S., & Yang, G. (2020). Asymmetric relationship between carbon emission trading market and stock market: Evidences from China. Energy Economics, 91: 104850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104850 Go to original source...
    49. Wu, J., Wei, Y. D., Chen, W., & Yuan, F. (2019). Environmental regulations and redistribution of polluting industries in transitional China: Understanding regional and industrial differences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.042 Go to original source...
    50. Yahoo Finance. (2024). Charts, Data & News - HANG SENG INDEX (^HSI). Retrieved September 17, 2024, from https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EHSI/
    51. Zenno, Y., & Aruga, K. (2024). Comparing factors affecting Chinese institutional investors' willingness to pay for green bonds in Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1): 2292365. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2292365 Go to original source...
    52. Zhou, K., & Li, Y. (2019). Influencing factors and fluctuation characteristics of China's carbon emission trading price. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 524, 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.249 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return