Central European Business Review X:X | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.399

Family Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: Empirical Analysis from Hungary

Melinda Krankovits ORCID...1, Márta Konczosné Szombathelyi ORCID...2, Judit Csákné Filep ORCID...3, Áron Szennay ORCID...4
1 Széchenyi István University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Informatics and Electrical Engineering, Department of Mathematics and Computational Science, Győr, Hungary. Email: kmelinda@math.sze.hu (corresponding author)
2 Széchenyi István University, Kautz Gyula Faculty of Economics, Department of Leadership and Marketing, Győr, Hungary. Email: kszm@sze.hu
3 Budapest University of Economics and Business, Budapest LAB Office for Entrepreneurship Development, Budapest, Hungary. Email: csaknefilep.judit@uni-bge.hu / University of Nyíregyháza, Institute of Business Sciences, Nyíregyháza, Hungary. Email: filep.judit@nye.hu
4 Budapest University of Economics and Business, Budapest LAB Office for Entrepreneurship Development, Budapest, Hungary. Email: szennay.aron@uni-bge.hu

Family firms, accounting for 60% of European private sector jobs, play a critical role in advancing business sector sustainability through their practices and employment characteristics. This study examines family entrepreneurs’ attitudes toward sustainability using quantitative methods and the 2023 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Annual Population Survey (APS) dataset from Hungary. Businesses were categorised into non-family, one-person, and family enterprises. After analysing the reliability of sustainability-related questions, two indices measuring attitudes toward environmental, social, and economic sustainability were constructed: a comprehensive index allowing compensation between dimensions and an aggregate evaluation index. Using one-way ANOVA, we compared sustainability indices across the business categories. Results revealed no significant differences in sustainability performance, irrespective of the indicator used. Robustness was confirmed with four control variables (gender, educational attainment, entrepreneurship phase, and number of jobs created), none indicating significant differences. No significant correlations emerged between sustainability indices and entrepreneurs’ age. These findings align with prior analyses, indicating no marked differences in sustainability attitudes between family and non-family firms. Two factors may explain these results: Hungary’s market dominance by microbusinesses due to disrupted business traditions during the socialist era and GEM’s focus on entrepreneurship, favouring smaller entities like sole proprietorships.
Implications for Central European audience: This study underscores the need to continuously develop sustainable business attitudes. It also offers a recent literature review, providing valuable insights for Central European researchers, corporate leaders, and family business managers.

Keywords: SDG; family entrepreneurship; GEM; sustainability

Received: October 8, 2024; Revised: December 12, 2024; Accepted: January 3, 2025; Prepublished online: June 17, 2025 

Download citation

References

  1. Adomako, S., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Danso, A., Konadu, R., & Owusu-Agyei, S. (2019). Environmental sustainability orientation and performance of family and nonfamily firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1250-1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2314. Go to original source...
  2. Agostino, M., & Ruberto, S. (2021). Environment-friendly practices: Family versus non-family firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329, 129689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129689. Go to original source...
  3. Ahn, H. S., Jeong, E., & Cho, H. (2021). Toward an Understanding of Family Business Sustainability: A Network-Based Systematic Review. Sustainability, 13(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010005. Go to original source...
  4. Aparicio, G., & Iturralde, T. (2023). New Research Trends in Sustainability in Family Businesses: A Bibliometric Literature Review. European Journal of Family Business, 13(1), 36-55. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v13i1.16744. Go to original source...
  5. Bauweraerts, J., Arzubiaga, U., & Diaz-Moriana, V. (2022). Going greener, performing better? The case of private family firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 63, 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101784. Go to original source...
  6. Bernhard, F., Hiepler, M., & Engel, F. X. (2020). Family Business Sustainability: The Intergenerational Transfer of Social Capital and Network Contacts. In A. Saxena Arora, S. Bacouel-Jentjens, M. Sepehri, & A. Arora (Eds.), Sustainable Innovation: Trends in Marketing and Management (pp. 101-132). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30421-8_9. Go to original source...
  7. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: Theoretical Dimensions, Assessment Approaches, and Agenda for Future Research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355. Go to original source...
  8. Breton-Miller, I. L., & Miller, D. (2016). Family firms and practices of sustainability: A contingency view. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.09.001. Go to original source...
  9. Broccardo, L., Truant, E., & Zicari, A. (2019). Internal corporate sustainability drivers: What evidence from family firms? A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1672. Go to original source...
  10. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00055-7. Go to original source...
  11. Clauß, T., Kraus, S., & Jones, P. (2022). Sustainability in family business: Mechanisms, technologies and business models for achieving economic prosperity, environmental quality and social equity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121450. Go to original source...
  12. Csákné Filep J., Radácsi L., Szennay Á., & Timár G. (2023a). Taking initiative and earning a living - Entrepreneurial motivations and opportunity perception in Hungary. Budapesti Gazdasági Egyetem. https://budapestlab.hu/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/GEM-BGE_beliv_2023_angol_webre.pdf Go to original source...
  13. Csákné Filep, J., Radácsi, L., & Szennay, Á. (2023b). Comparing the Innovation and Export Performance of Hungarian Family and Non-Family Enterprises: Experiences Drawn from Empirical Surveys. Administrative Sciences, 13(6), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13060146. Go to original source...
  14. Curado, C., & Mota, A. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review on Sustainability in Family Firms. Sustainability, 13(7), 3824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073824. Go to original source...
  15. Danes, S. M., Stafford, K., Haynes, G., & Amarapurkar, S. S. (2009). Family Capital of Family Firms: Bridging Human, Social, and Financial Capital. Family Business Review, 22(3), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509333424. Go to original source...
  16. De Las Heras-Rosas, C., & Herrera, J. (2020). Family Firms and Sustainability. A Longitudinal Analysis. Sustainability, 12(13), 5477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135477. Go to original source...
  17. Delmas, M. A., & Gergaud, O. (2014). Sustainable Certification for Future Generations: The Case of Family Business. Family Business Review, 27(3), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486514538651. Go to original source...
  18. Domańska, A., Gryglicka, A., Martyniuk, O., Więcek-Janka, E., & Zajkowski, R. (2023). The state of the art in sustainability of Central-Eastern European family firms: Systematic literature review. International Entrepreneurship Review, 9(3), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2023.0903.02. Go to original source...
  19. Dorninger, C., Hornborg, A., Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Schaffartzik, A., Giljum, S., Engler, J. O., Feller, R. L., Hubacek, K., & Wieland, H. (2021). Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. Ecological Economics, 179, 106824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824. Go to original source...
  20. Elkington, J. (2018, June 25). 25 Years Ago I Coined the Phrase "Triple Bottom Line." Here's Why It's Time to Rethink It. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it.
  21. Ernst, R. A., Gerken, M., Hack, A., & Hülsbeck, M. (2022). Family firms as agents of sustainable development: A normative perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121135. Go to original source...
  22. European Parliament. (2015). European Parliament resolution of 8 September 2015 on family businesses in Europe (2014/2210(INI)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0290_EN.html.
  23. Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., Schiavone, F., & Mahto, R. V. (2021). Sustainability in family business - A bibliometric study and a research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121077. Go to original source...
  24. GEM (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor). (2023). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2022/2023 Global Report: Adapting to a "New Normal". London: GEM. https://gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=51147.
  25. GEM (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor). (2024). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2023/2024 Global Report: 25 Years and Growing. London: GEM. https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/global-entrepreneurship-monitor-gem-20232024-global-report-25-years-and-growing.
  26. Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-Controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106. Go to original source...
  27. Herrera, J., & De Las Heras-Rosas, C. (2020). Economic, Non-Economic and Critical Factors for the Sustainability of Family Firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040119. Go to original source...
  28. Hnilica, J., Uhlaner, L. M., Machek, O., Kubíček, A., Lukeą, M., Jurek, M., & ©tamfestová, P. (2020). The Role of Responsible Ownership and Family in Privately Held Firms with Multiple Owners: Preliminary Findings from the Czech Republic. Central European Business Review, 8(5), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.231. Go to original source...
  29. Kavadis, N., & Thomsen, S. (2023). Sustainable corporate governance: A review of research on long-term corporate ownership and sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 198-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12486. Go to original source...
  30. Kelley, D., Gartner, W. B., & Allen, M. (2020). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Family Business Report. Babson Park: Babson College Press. https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/20192020-global-entrepreneurship-monitor-gem-family-entrepreneurship-report-2.
  31. König, A., Kammerlander, N., & Enders, A. (2013). The Family Innovator's Dilemma: How Family Influence Affects the Adoption of Discontinuous Technologies by Incumbent Firms. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 418-441. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0162. Go to original source...
  32. Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why Do Some Family Businesses Out-Compete? Governance, Long-Term Orientations, and Sustainable Capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 731-746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00147.x. Go to original source...
  33. López-Pérez, M. E., Melero-Polo, I., Vázquez-Carrasco, R., & Cambra-Fierro, J. (2018). Sustainability and Business Outcomes in the Context of SMEs: Comparing Family Firms vs. Non-Family Firms. Sustainability, 10(11), 4080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114080. Go to original source...
  34. Lumpkin, G. T., & Brigham, K. H. (2011). Long-Term Orientation and Intertemporal Choice in Family Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1149-1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00495.x. Go to original source...
  35. Mahto, R. V., & Khanin, D. (2015). Satisfaction with Past Financial Performance, Risk Taking, and Future Performance Expectations in the Family Business. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(3), 801-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12088. Go to original source...
  36. Mariani, M. M., Al-Sultan, K., & De Massis, A. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(3), 1192-1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955122. Go to original source...
  37. Memili, E., Fang, H. "Chevy", Koç, B., Yildirim-Öktem, Ö., & Sonmez, S. (2018). Sustainability practices of family firms: The interplay between family ownership and long-term orientation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1308371. Go to original source...
  38. Neckebrouck, J., Schulze, W., & Zellweger, T. (2018). Are Family Firms Good Employers? Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 553-585. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0765. Go to original source...
  39. Nemes, K., & Konczos-Szombathelyi, M. (2023). Capacity Expansion for Sustainable Development in Family Businesses Recyclable Packaging Materials in Food Industry. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 107, 181-186. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET23107031. Go to original source...
  40. Neubaum, D. O., Dibrell, C., & Craig, J. B. (2012). Balancing natural environmental concerns of internal and external stakeholders in family and non-family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(1), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.01.003. Go to original source...
  41. Niehm, L. S., Swinney, J., & Miller, N. J. (2008). Community Social Responsibility and Its Consequences for Family Business Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00247.x. Go to original source...
  42. Pomare, C. (2018). A Multiple Framework Approach to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Entrepreneurship. In Entrepreneurship and the Sustainable Development Goals (Vol. 8, pp. 11-31). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-724620180000008006. Go to original source...
  43. PwC. (2024). PwC's Global NextGen Survey 2024: Success and succession in an AI world. PwC. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/c-suite-insights/nextgen.html.
  44. Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., Lopez-Garcia, P., & Chin, N. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation 1998-2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1980-1. Go to original source...
  45. Rideg, A., Sipos, N., Lukovszki, L., & Varga, A. R. (2023). A magyar családi mikro-, kis- és középvállalatok erőforrás- és képességkonfigurációi. Közgazdasági Szemle, 70(12), 1389-1413. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2023.12.1389. Go to original source...
  46. Rivo-López, E., Villanueva-Villar, M., Vaquero-García, A., & Lago-Peñas, S. (2020). Do family firms contribute to job stability? Evidence from the great recession. Journal of Family Business Management, 12(1), 152-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-06-2020-0055. Go to original source...
  47. Rovelli, P., Ferasso, M., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2022). Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo and future directions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100422. Go to original source...
  48. Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M., & Hockerts, K. (2018). Collaborative entrepreneurship for sustainability. Creating solutions in light of the UN sustainable development goals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092709. Go to original source...
  49. Schaltegger, S., & Synnestvedt, T. (2002). The link between 'green' and economic success: Environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(4), 339-346. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0555. Go to original source...
  50. Schmidt, F. C., Zanini, R. R., Korzenowski, A. L., Schmidt Junior, R., & Xavier do Nascimento, K. B. (2018). Evaluation of Sustainability Practices in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises in Southern Brazil. Sustainability, 10(7), 2460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072460. Go to original source...
  51. Sharma, P., & Sharma, S. (2011). Drivers of Proactive Environmental Strategy in Family Firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 309-334. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121218. Go to original source...
  52. Stock, C., Pütz, L., Schell, S., & Werner, A. (2024). Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: Status and Future Directions of a Research Field. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(1), 199-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05382-4. Go to original source...
  53. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
  54. United Nations. (2016). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2016. https://mdgs.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/The%20Sustainable%20Development%20Goals%20Report%202016.pdf.
  55. WCED. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.
  56. World Economic Forum. (2024, March 27). Family business could help today's sustainability challenges. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/03/family-business-sustainability-trust/.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.