Central European Business Review 2025, 14(3):87-102 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.390

Understanding Consumers and Their Preferences Purchasing Food with Product Quality Labels: Insights from the Czech Market

Michal Stoklasa ORCID...1, Michal Halaška ORCID...2
1 Silesian University, School of Business Administration, Department of Business Economics and Management, Karviná, Czech Republic. Email: stoklasa@opf.slu.cz (corresponding author)
2 Silesian University, School of Business Administration, Department of Business Economics and Management, Karviná, Czech Republic. Email: halaska@opf.slu.cz

Companies with product quality labels, often micro-companies or solo entrepreneurs, do not have the marketing know-how of retail chains and are being outpaced in communication in the fast current online environment, especially on social media platforms. Current literature does not provide this specific knowledge, such as what are the important product quality characteristics which should be talked about in marketing campaigns and how these should campaigns be targeted. Thus, the aim of this article is to examine the product quality characteristics important for Czech consumers purchasing food products with a quality label and find suitable consumer characteristics for better targeting of marketing campaigns. The data were gathered using a questionnaire survey by the professional marketing agency Ipsos. The sample of 1,050 Czech consumers was filtered for consumers purchasing regional products or other products with a product quality label. The main statistical method used is the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction as a post-hoc test. The product quality characteristics are divided into 7 categories and sorted by their importance. The significance of third-party information being the most positively evaluated product quality characteristic suggests a shift in consumer trust. The study identifies demographic variations in quality perception, with older consumers (ages 54–65 and 36–44) valuing brand, composition and price, while younger consumers (ages 18–26) prioritise electronic word of mouth (eWOM) and online availability. Higher education levels correlate with a greater focus on price and communication as quality indicators, while gender differences reveal distinct preferences, such as women favouring traditional packaging and environmental friendliness and men prioritising eWOM and quality processing. Also, the archaic nature of quality labels in the Czech Republic is highlighted.
Implications for Central European audience: The results of this study reveal the most important food product quality characteristics for Czech consumers and might be applicable to neighbouring countries with high preferences for quality labels, such as Poland and Slovakia. This study also provides consumer characteristics usable in targeting of marketing campaigns, usable as a premise for further research in Central European countries.

Keywords: product quality; product quality characteristics and cues; extrinsic and intrinsic product quality; quality label; consumer purchasing behaviour
JEL classification: M31

Received: August 4, 2024; Revised: October 6, 2024; Accepted: November 4, 2024; Prepublished online: March 27, 2025; Published: July 30, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Stoklasa, M., & Halaška, M. (2025). Understanding Consumers and Their Preferences Purchasing Food with Product Quality Labels: Insights from the Czech Market. Central European Business Review, 14(3), 87-102. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.390
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Acebrón, L. B., & Dopico, D. C. (2000). The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: an empirical application for beef. Food Quality and Preference, 11, 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00059-2. Go to original source...
    2. Akdeniz, B., Calantone, R. J., & Voorhees, C. M. (2012). Effectiveness of Marketing Cues on Consumer Perceptions of Quality: The Moderating Roles of Brand Reputation and Third-Party Information. Psychology and Marketing, 30(1), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20590. Go to original source...
    3. Bauerová, R., & Klepek, M. (2018). Technology Acceptance as a Determinant of Online Grocery Shopping Adoption. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(3), 737-746. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201866030737. Go to original source...
    4. Brecic, R., Mesic, Z., & Cerjak, M. (2017). Importance of intrinsic and extrinsic quality food characteristics by different consumer segments. British Food Journal, 119(4), 845-862. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2016-0284. Go to original source...
    5. Chalupová, M., & Prokop, M. (2016). Awareness of the Vysočina regional food labels with context of their media presence. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(1), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664010223. Go to original source...
    6. Eertmans, A., Baeyens, F., & Van den Bergh, O. (2001). Food likes and their relative importance in human eating behaviour: Review and preliminary suggestions for health promotion. Health Education Research, 16, 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.4.443. Go to original source...
    7. European Commission. (2020). Quality schemes explained. Retrieved April 18, 2023, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/food-safety-and-quality/certification/quality-labels/quality-schemes-explained#geographicalindications.
    8. Gené, J.M., Puiggené, S.S., & Larraz, J.L.G. (2024). Determining the influence of belonging to a wine protected designation of origin on profitability. Agribusiness, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21947. Go to original source...
    9. Grunert, K. G., & Aachmann, K. (2016). Consumer reactions to the use of EU quality labels on food products: A review of the literature. Food Control, 59, 178-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.021. Go to original source...
    10. Hsu, CH., & Chen, M. (2014). Explaining consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward organic food: Contributions from regulatory fit and consumer characteristics. Food Quality and Preference, 35, 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.01.005. Go to original source...
    11. Javeed, A., Aljuaid, M., Khan, Z., Mahmood, Z., & Shadid, D. (2022). Role of Extrinsic Cues in the Formation of Quality Perceptions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 913836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913836. Go to original source...
    12. Jürkenbeck, K., & Spiller, A. (2021). Importance of sensory quality signals in consumers' food choice. Food Quality and Preference, 90, 104155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104155. Go to original source...
    13. Lee, M., & Lou, Y. C. (2011). Consumer reliance on intrinsic and extrinsic cues in product evaluations: a conjoint approach. Journal of Applied Business Research, 12(1): 21-29. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v12i1.5833. Go to original source...
    14. Liu, R., Pieniak, Z., & Verbeke, W. (2013). Consumers' attitudes and behaviour towards safe food in China: A review. Food Control, 33(1), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.01.051. Go to original source...
    15. Margarisová, K., Vokáčová, L., Kuralová, K., & Hlavsa, T. (2018). Regional Branding: Customer's Experience with the Certified Products. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(6), 1549-1556. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201866061549. Go to original source...
    16. Markovina, J., Stewart-Knox, B. J., Rankin, A., Gibney, M., de Almeida, M. D. V., Fischer, A., & Frewer, L. J. (2015). Food4Me study: Validity and reliability of Food Choice Questionnaire in 9 European countries. Food Quality and Preference, 45, 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.002. Go to original source...
    17. Mascarello G., Pinto A., Parise N., Crovato S., & Ravarotto, L. (2015) The perception of food quality. Profiling Italian consumers. Appetite, 89, 175-182. https://doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.014. Go to original source...
    18. Mondelaers, K., Verbeke, W., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2009). Importance of health and environment as quality traits in the buying decision of organic products. British Food Journal, 111(10), 1120-1139. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910992952. Go to original source...
    19. Olson, J.C. & Jacoby, J. (1972). Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, 167-179.
    20. Ozimek, I., & Zakowska-Biemans, S. (2011). Determinants of Polish consumers' food choices and their implication for the national food industry. British Food Journal, 113(1), 138-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701111097394. Go to original source...
    21. Petrescu, D.C., Vermeir I., & Petrescu-Mag, R.M. (2020). Consumer Understanding of Food Quality, Healthiness, and Environmental Impact: A Cross-National Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010169. Go to original source...
    22. Petrescu, D.C., Vermeir, I., Burny, P. & Petrescu-Mag, R.M. (2022). Consumer evaluation of food quality and the role of environmental cues. A comprehensive cross-country study. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100178. Go to original source...
    23. Purohit, D., & Srivastava, J. (2001). Effect of manufacturer reputation, retailer reputation, and product warranty on consumer judgements of product quality: A cue diagnosticity framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1003_1. Go to original source...
    24. Sadílek, T. (2019). Consumer preferences regarding food quality labels: the case of Czechia. British Food Journal, 121(10), 2508-2523. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0150. Go to original source...
    25. Shepherd, R. (1999). Social determinants of food choice. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 58(04), 807-812. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665199001093. Go to original source...
    26. Steptoe, A., Pollard, T. M., & Wardle, J. (1995). Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25(3), 267-284. Go to original source...
    27. Stoklasa, M. (2015). Možnosti využití regionálního značení produktů v Moravskoslezském kraji pohledem cross-kulturního marketingu. Karviná: SU OPF.
    28. Stoklasa, M., & Pitrunová, E. (2020). Understanding regional product characteristics and consumers purchasing them in the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 68(1), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun202068010243. Go to original source...
    29. Sumaedi, S., Rakhmawati, T., Astrini, N. J., Yarmen, M., Bakti, I. G. M. Y., & Damayanti, S. (2023). Key Company Success Factors in Creating High-Quality Innovative Food Products. Sage Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221148145. Go to original source...
    30. Sun, Y., Huang, Y., Fang, X. & Yan, F. (2022). The Purchase Intention for Agricultural Products of Regional Public Brands: Examining the Influences of Awareness, Perceived Quality, and Brand Trust. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4991059. Go to original source...
    31. Velčovská, Š. (2012). Food Quality Labels and their Perception by Consumers in the Czech Republic. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 6(6), 1046-1052.
    32. Verbeke, W., Pieniak, Z., Guerrero, L., & Hersleth, M. (2012). Consumers Awareness and Attitudinal Determinants of European Union Quality Label Use on Traditional Foods. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 1(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.141970. Go to original source...
    33. Vokáčová, L., Margarisová, K., Huml, J., & Čerkasov, J. (2017). Regional bands as an attribute of product quality. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(6), 2131-2140. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765062131. Go to original source...
    34. Walters, A., & Long, M. (2012). The effect of food label cues on perceptions of quality and purchase intentions among high-involvement consumers with varying levels of nutrition knowledge. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 44(4), 350-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2011.08.008. Go to original source...
    35. Wang Edward, S.T. (2013). The influence of visual packaging design on perceived food product quality, value, and brand preference. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(10), 805-816. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2012-0113. Go to original source...
    36. Yim, M.S. (2020). The Relationships between Product Quality Cues and Perceived Values based on Gender Differences at a Food Select Shop. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 11(10), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no10.59. Go to original source...
    37. Zander, K., & Hamm, U. (2012). Information search behaviour and its determinants: The case of ethical attributes of organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36, 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.00998.x. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content