Central European Business Review 2024, 13(2):1-25 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.343

Potential Effects of Instagram Usage on Conspicuous Consumption of Premium Luxurious Fashion Products among Bulgarians

Vladimir Zhechev ORCID...1, Daniela Sekulova2
1 University of Economics-Varna, Faculty of Management, Department of Marketing, Varna, Bulgaria, vladimir.zhechev@ue-varna.bg
2 University of Economics-Varna, Faculty of Management, Department of Marketing, Varna, Bulgaria, sekulova.daniela@outlook.com (corresponding author)

In the days when the notion of “keeping up with Joneses” is stepping back to “keeping up with the network”, it is of great importance to seek an understanding of how classical theories and thoughts (such as Veblen’s conspicuous consumption theory from 1899) are potentially affected as a result of the development of social media (SM). Nowadays, social media catalyses conspicuous consumption while expanding what is considered a social group and social classes and fuelling the aspirant group influence and social comparison. This paper provides a theoretical framework of the conspicuous consumption school of thought and characteristics of premium luxury fashion goods. It traces deep-rooted consumption patterns from Bulgaria's background and argues the potential underlying motives of conspicuous consumption. It further investigates consumer behaviour and addresses the existing gaps in the extant academic literature by discussing the results of an online survey among 130 respondents (53.1% of the respondents were 25 years of age or less, and 46.9% were above 25). The main objective of the paper is to study the relationship between variables of conspicuous consumption, the symbolic value of images displayed online, social media intensity and the fulfilment of social needs in the context of Instagram as a selected social media. The study data demonstrate that Instagram intensity fosters social comparison, which leads to an increased need for uniqueness. Younger individuals and females, in general, have the desire to project a conspicuous image online, and they would most likely post their luxurious premium fashion products online. Our findings confirm that social media fosters social comparison, resulting in an increased need for differentiation, uniqueness and social conformity. The findings add to a growing body of literature on social media and substantially to our understanding of Bulgarian customers’ perception of premium luxury fashion products.
Implications for Central European audience: The paper builds on extant literature in the field of conspicuous consumption, which is a common phenomenon in post-socialist countries. It provides a custom methodology for studying the conspicuous display of fashion items on Instagram, which is one of the most used communication media on a regular basis among young people in CEE (Eurostat, 2022) and the second most popular social media in Europe (Statcounter, 2022). The distribution of global social media users accounts for 5.7% in Central Europe and 5% in Eastern Europe (Statista, 2022). The results can be used by companies in the sector, new entrants, influencers, opinion leaders, etc.

Keywords: conspicuous consumption; branding; luxury fashion
JEL classification: M3, M37

Received: February 2, 2023; Revised: May 29, 2023; Accepted: June 22, 2023; Prepublished online: October 31, 2023; Published: May 30, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zhechev, V., & Sekulova, D. (2024). Potential Effects of Instagram Usage on Conspicuous Consumption of Premium Luxurious Fashion Products among Bulgarians. Central European Business Review13(2), 1-25. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.343
Download citation

References

  1. Aagerup, U., & Nilsson, J. (2016). Green consumer behaviour: being good or seeming good? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25(3), 274-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2015-0903. Go to original source...
  2. Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with Influencers' fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177. Go to original source...
  3. Ancillai, C., Terho, H., Cardinali, S., & Pascucci, F. (2019). Advancing social media driven sales research: Establishing conceptual foundations for B-to-B social selling. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2019.01.002. Go to original source...
  4. Arriagada, A., & Ibáñez, F. (2020). "You Need At Least One Picture Daily, if Not, You're Dead": Content Creators and Platform Evolution in the Social Media Ecology. Social Media and Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120944624. Go to original source...
  5. Assimos, B. M., de Rezende Pinto, M., Leite, R. S., & de Andrade, M. L. (2019). Conspicuous Consumption and its Relation to Brand Consciousness, Status Consumption and Self-Expression. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 16(4), 350-368. https://doi.org/10.15728/BBR.2019.16.4.3. Go to original source...
  6. Bailey, A. A., Bonifield, C. M., & Elhai, J. D. (2021). Modelling consumer engagement on social networking sites: Roles of attitudinal and motivational factors. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102348. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2020.102348. Go to original source...
  7. Bain & Company. (2023). Renaissance in Uncertainty: Luxury Builds on Its Rebound. Retrieved May 2023 from https://www.bain.com/insights/renaissance-in-uncertainty-luxury-builds-on-its-rebound/
  8. Bar-Haïm, G. (1987). The Meaning of Western Commerical Artifacts for Eastern European Youth. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16(2), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241687162004. Go to original source...
  9. Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1086/208911. Go to original source...
  10. Becker, K., Lee, J. W., & Nobre, H. M. (2018). The concept of luxury brands and the relationship between consumers and luxury brands. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(3), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2018.vol5.no3.51. Go to original source...
  11. Berdahl, D. (2006). New directions in the study of postsocialist consumption. Anthropology of East Europe Review, 24 (2), 10-12.
  12. Berthon, P., Pitt, L., Parent, M., & Berthon, J.-P. (2009). Aesthetics and Ephemerality: Observing and preserving the luxury brand. California Management Review, 52(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2009.52.1.45. Go to original source...
  13. Bilge, H. A. (2015). Luxury Consumption: Literature Review.Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 18(1), 35-55. Go to original source...
  14. Briskman, J. (2022). Sensor Tower's Q4 2021 Data Digest: Worldwide App Downloads Totaled 36.1 Billion Last Quarter. Sensor Tower. https://sensortower.com/blog/q4-2021-data-digest/.
  15. Burnasheva, R., & Suh, Y. G. (2020). The influence of social media usage, self-image congruity and self-esteem on conspicuous online consumption among millennials. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(5), 1255-1269. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2020-0180. Go to original source...
  16. Business of Fashion, & McKinsey. (2022). The State of Fashion 2023: Resilience in the Face of Uncertainty | BoF. Retrieved May 2023, https://www.businessoffashion.com/reports/news-analysis/the-state-of-fashion-2023-industry-report-bof-mckinsey/.
  17. Bloomberg Intelligence (2023) Big luxury goods most resilient on China wait: 5 charts for 2023. Retrieved May, 2023, from https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/big-luxury-goods-most-resilient-on-china-wait-5-charts-for-2023/,
  18. Caliandro, A., & Graham, J. (2020). Studying Instagram Beyond Selfies. Social Media + Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120924779. Go to original source...
  19. Cao, X., Guo, X., Vogel, D., & Zhang, X. (2016). Exploring the influence of social media on employee work performance. Internet Research, 26(2), 529-545. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-11-2014-0299/FULL/PDF. Go to original source...
  20. Chen, J., Gao, J., Liu, Z., Luo, Y., Chen, M., & Bu, L. (2022). Luxury in Emerging Markets: An Investigation of the Role of Subjective Social Class and Conspicuous Consumption. Sustainability, 14(4), 2096. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042096. Go to original source...
  21. Corneo, G., & Jeanne, O. (1997). Conformism, snobbism, and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Public Economics, 66, 55-71. Go to original source...
  22. Crãciun, M., & Lipan, Ș. (2020). Introduction: The Middle Class in Post-socialist Europe: Ethnographies of Its "Good Life". East European Politics and Societies, 34(2), 423-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420902509. Go to original source...
  23. Creed, G. W. (2002). Anthropology of East Europe Review (Consumer) Paradise Lost: Capitalist Dynamics And Disenchantment In Rural Bulgaria. Anthropology of East Europe Review, 20(2), 119-125.
  24. Creevey, D., Coughlan, J., &O'connor, C. (2021). Social media and luxury: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(1), 99-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12271. Go to original source...
  25. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., &Vrontis, D. (2023). Masstige marketing: An empirical study of consumer perception and product attributes with moderating role of status, emotion, and pride. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113401. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2022.113401. Go to original source...
  26. Davenport, S. W., Bergman, S. M., Bergman, J. Z., & Fearrington, M. E. (2014). Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.011. Go to original source...
  27. de Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., &Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude.International Journal of Advertising,36(5),798-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035. Go to original source...
  28. Dhun, & Dangi, H. K. (2022). Influencer Marketing: Role of Influencer Credibility and Congruence on Brand Attitude and eWOM. Journal of Internet Commerce, 22(1), 28-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2022.2125220. Go to original source...
  29. Djafarova, E., & Bowes, T. (2021). 'Instagram made Me buy it': Generation Z impulse purchases in fashion industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102345 Go to original source...
  30. Dolega, L., Rowe, F., & Branagan, E. (2021). Going digital? The impact of social media marketing on retail website traffic, orders and sales. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, 102501. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2021.102501. Go to original source...
  31. Duan, J., & Dholakia, R. R. (2017). Posting purchases on social media increases happiness: The mediating roles of purchases' impact on self and interpersonal relationships. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(5), 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-07-2016-1871. Go to original source...
  32. Dubois, B., Laurent, G., &Czellar, S. (2001). Consumer rapport to luxury: Analyzing complex and ambivalent attitudes. HEC Research Papers Series 736, HEC Paris.
  33. Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior. Harvard University Press.
  34. D'Arpizio Claudia, Levato Federica, Prete Filippo, & Joëlle de Montgolfier. (2023). Renaissance in Uncertainty: Luxury Builds on Its Rebound | Bain & Company. Retrieved April, 2023, from https://www.bain.com/insights/renaissance-in-uncertainty-luxury-builds-on-its-rebound.
  35. Eurostat. (2022). Eurostat: Regions in Europe, 2022 interactive edition. Retrieved April, 2023, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/digpub/regions/#making-use-of-the-internet.
  36. Forristal, L. (2022). TikTok was the top app by worldwide downloads in Q1 2022 |. TechCrunch. Retrieved May, 2023 from https://techcrunch.com/2022/04/26/tiktok-was-the-top-app-by-worldwide-downloads-in-q1-2022
  37. Fromkin, H. L., & Snyder, C. R. (1980). The Search for Uniqueness and Valuation of Scarcity. Social Exchange, 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_3. Go to original source...
  38. Fetais, A. H., Raed, ., Algharabat, S., Aljafari, . Abdullah, Nripendra, ., & Rana, P. (2022) Do Social Media Marketing Activities Improve Brand Loyalty? An Empirical Study on Luxury Fashion Brands. Information System Frontiers, 25, 795-817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10264-7. Go to original source...
  39. Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., & Chen, P. (2019). The Status Signals Paradox. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(5), 690-696. https://doi.org/10(5) 690-696. Go to original source...
  40. Ger, G., &Belk, W. R. (1996). I'd Like to Buy the World a Coke: Consumption escapes of the "Less Affluent World'. Journal of Consumer Policy, 19, 271-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411411. Go to original source...
  41. Gierl, H., & Huettl, V. (2010). Are scarce products always more attractive? The interaction of different types of scarcity signals with products' suitability for conspicuous consumption. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.002. Go to original source...
  42. Gkikas, D. C., Tzafilkou, K., Theodoridis, P. K., Garmpis, A., &Gkikas, M. C. (2022). How do text characteristics impact user engagement in social media posts: Modelling content readability, length, and hashtags number in Facebook. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(1), 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JJIMEI.2022.100067. Go to original source...
  43. Govier, T. (1994). Is It a Jungle Out There? Trust, Distrust and the Construction of Social Reality. Dialogue, 33(2), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300010519. Go to original source...
  44. Greenberg, J. (2006). NoæReklamo¾dera: Democracy, Consumption, and the Contradictions of Representation in Post-Socialist Serbia. PoLAR, 29, 181. Go to original source...
  45. Guardian.(2022). Social media marketing.Retrieved May, 2023, from https://guardian-marketing.com/social-media-marketing-2/.
  46. Halil, I. (2019). The Impact of Conspicuous Consumption in SocialMedia on Purchasing Intentions.ݺletmeAraºtirmalariDergisi, 3, 2176-2190. Go to original source...
  47. Hearn, A., & Schoenhoff, S. (2015). From Celebrity to Influencer: Tracing the Diffusion of Celebrity Value across the Data Stream. A Companion to Celebrity, 194-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118475089.CH11. Go to original source...
  48. Heine, K. (2010). The personality of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 1(3), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2010.10593067. Go to original source...
  49. Hill, C. W. L., & Hult, G. T. M. (n.d.). International Business: Competing in the Global marketplace. (12th ed., pp. 90-121). McGraw-Hill Education.
  50. Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y. Go to original source...
  51. Husain, R., Ahmad, A., & Khan, B. M. (2022). The role of status consumption and brand equity: A comparative study of the marketing of Indian luxury brands by traditional and social-media. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 41(4), 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOE.22156. Go to original source...
  52. Ho, F. N., Wong, J., &Brodowsky, G. (2023). Does masstige offer the prestige of luxury without the social costs? Status and warmth perceptions from masstige and luxury signals. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113382. Go to original source...
  53. Instagram. (2022). About Instagram. Retrieved April, 2023, from https://about.instagram.com/.
  54. Siepmann, C., Holthoff, L. C., & Kowalczuk, P. (2022). Conspicuous consumption of luxury experiences: an experimental investigation of status perceptions on social media. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 31(3), 454-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2020-3047 Go to original source...
  55. Silverstein, M. J., & Fiske, N. (2003). Luxury for the Masses. Harvard Business Review, 81(4), 48-59.
  56. Jensen Schau, H., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1086/378616. Go to original source...
  57. Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E. (2019). Marketing Intelligence & Planning Instafamous and social media influencer marketing Article information: For Authors. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37(5), 567-579. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2018-0375. Go to original source...
  58. Kapferer, J.-N. (1997). Managing luxury brands. Journal of Brand Management, 4(4), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51127-6_11. Go to original source...
  59. Kapferer, J.-N., &Michaut-Denizeau, A. (2014). Is luxury compatible with sustainability? Luxury consumers' viewpoint. Journal of Brand Management, 21(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2013.19 Go to original source...
  60. Kar Wai, L., & Osman, S. (2019). The Influence of Self-esteem in the Relationship of Social Media Usage and Conspicuous Consumption. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9 (2), 335-352. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i2/5549. Go to original source...
  61. Kastanakis, M. N., &Balabanis, G. (2012). Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the "bandwagon" luxury consumption behavior. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1399-1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.005. Go to original source...
  62. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440.
  63. Keasbey, L. M. (1903). Prestige value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 17(3), 456-475. Go to original source...
  64. Ko, E., Costello, J. P., & Taylor, C. R. (2019). What is a luxury brand? A new definition and review of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 99, 405-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.023. Go to original source...
  65. Kotler, P. (1965). Behavioral models for analyzing buyers. Journal of Marketing, 29(4), 37-45. Go to original source...
  66. Krasteva-Blagoeva, E. (2018). Approaching Consumer Culture: Global Flows and Local Contexts. Cham: Springer. Go to original source...
  67. Krause, H.-V., Krasnova, H., &Buxmann, P. (2019). Keeping Up with the Joneses: Instagram Use and its Influence on Conspicuous Consumption. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) Proceedings. Munich, Germany.
  68. Lair, D. J., Sullivan, K., & Cheney, G. (2016). Marketization and the Recasting of the Professional Self. Management Communication Quarterly, 18(3), 307-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318904270744. Go to original source...
  69. Lee, J. A., Sudarshan, S., Sussman, K. L., Bright, L. F., & Eastin, M. S. (2022). Why are consumers following social media influencers on Instagram? Exploration of consumers' motives for following influencers and the role of materialism. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 78-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1964226. Go to original source...
  70. Leibenstein H. (1950). Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882692. Go to original source...
  71. Lewis, A., &Moital, M. (2016). Young professionals' conspicuous consumption of clothing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 20(2), 138-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-04-2015-0034/FULL/PDF. Go to original source...
  72. Liebowitz, S. J., &Margolis, S. E. (1998). Network effects and externalities. The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, 2, 671-674.
  73. Lury, C. (1996). Consumer culture. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers university press.
  74. Luxury Tribune. (2023). LVMH: first quarter of 2023 up +17%. Retrieved May, 2023, from https://www.luxurytribune.com/en/lvmh-first-quarter-of-2023-up-17.
  75. Madzunya, N., Viljoen, K., & Cilliers, L. (2021). The effect of Instagram conspicuous consumptive behaviour on the intention to purchase luxury goods: A developing country's perspective. South African Journal of Information Management, 23(1),1-9. https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJIM.V23I1.1267. Go to original source...
  76. Marcoux, J.-S., Filiatrault, P., & Chéron, E. (1997). The Attitudes Underlying Preferences of Young Urban Educated Polish Consumers Towards Products Made in Western Countries. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(4), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v09n04_02. Go to original source...
  77. Marroncelli, R., & Braithwaite, N. (2022). #insta-fashion: How the Digital Revolution Has Affected Celebrity Culture and the British Fashion Retail Landscape. Fashion Practice, 14(1), 124-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2020.1794321. Go to original source...
  78. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, 8th ed.(1920). London: Mcmillan.
  79. Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy. Public Culture, 27(1(75)), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379. Go to original source...
  80. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370. Go to original source...
  81. Mazzocco, P. J., Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Anderson, E. T. (2012). Direct and vicarious conspicuous consumption: Identification with low-status groups increases the desire for high-status goods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 520-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.07.002. Go to original source...
  82. McCormick, K. (2016). Duesenberry and Veblen: The Demonstration Effect Revisited. Journal of Economic Issues, 17(4), 1125-1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1983.11504194. Go to original source...
  83. McMurry, R. N. (1944). Psychology in selling. Journal of Marketing, 9(2), 114-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224294400900203. Go to original source...
  84. Menger, C. (1950). Principles of Economics, trans. New York: The Free Press.
  85. Mircioiu, C., & Atkinson, J. (2016). A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods Applied to a Likert Scale. Pharmacy 2017, 5(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACY5020026. Go to original source...
  86. Muqaddam, A. A., & Jin, S. (2018). "Is Instafamous More Trustworthy Than Traditional Celebrities?" the Mediating Effects of Social Presence With Instagram Influencers and the Moderating Effects of Self-Discrepancy on Consumers' Attitude Towards Luxury Branding. American Academy of -Advertising. Conference. Proceedings(pp. 147-147).
  87. Nabi, R. L., & Keblusek, L. (2014). Inspired by Hope, Motivated by Envy: Comparing the Effects of Discrete Emotions in the Process of Social Comparison to Media Figures. Media Psychology, 17(2), 208-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.878663. Go to original source...
  88. Neave, L., Tzemou, E., &Fastoso, F. (2020). Seeking attention versus seeking approval: How conspicuous consumption differs between grandiose and vulnerable narcissists. Psychology& Marketing, 37(3), 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.21308. Go to original source...
  89. Niesiobêdzka, M., &Konaszewski, K. (2021). Narcissism, activity on Facebook, and conspicuous consumption among young adults. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 10(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.108751. Go to original source...
  90. Oberlo. (2022). Top Influencer Marketing Platforms. Retrieved January, 2023, from https://www.oberlo.com/statistics/top-influencer-marketing-platforms.
  91. O'Cass, A., & Frost, H. (2002). Status brands: Examining the effects of non-product-related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(2), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420210423455/FULL/PDF. Go to original source...
  92. O'Cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/CB.155. Go to original source...
  93. Oh, H., Godey, B., Pederzoli, D., Aiello, G., Donvito, R., Chan, P., Singh, R., Skorobogatykh, I. I., Tsuchiya, J., & Weitz, B. (2011). Brand and country-of-origin effect on consumers' decision to purchase luxury products Brand and country-of-origin effect on consumers' decision to purchase luxury products. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1461-1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.012. Go to original source...
  94. Ost, D., & Ost, D. (2009). The Invisibility and Centrality of Class After Communism. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society IJPS, 22, 497-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10767-009-9079-3. Go to original source...
  95. Page, C. (1992). A history of conspicuous consumption. ACR Special Volumes.
  96. Patsiaouras, G., & Fitchett, J. A. (2012). The evolution of conspicuous consumption.Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 4(1), 154-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/17557501211195109. Go to original source...
  97. Pellegrino, A., Abe, M., & Shannon, R. (2022). The Dark Side of Social Media-Effects of Social Media Content on the Relationship Between Materialism and Negative Consumption Behaviors.Frontiers in Psychology, 28(13), 870614. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870614. Go to original source...
  98. Petkova, L. (2018). New Models of Social Networks Impact on Fashion. Yearbook of Sofia University, 30(1).
  99. Podoshen, J. S., Li, L., & Zhang, J. (2011). Materialism and conspicuous consumption in China: A cross-cultural examination. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00930.x. Go to original source...
  100. Sahin, O., & Nasir, S. (2021). The effects of status consumption and conspicuous consumption on perceived symbolic status The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(1), 68-85.https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2021.1888649. Go to original source...
  101. Sedlarski, T. (2018). Happiness economics: the social nature of human happiness. Yearbook of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University, 15(1), 173-205.
  102. Sedlarski, T. (2019). Political Economy Of Social Status-Economic And Socio-Psychological Effects Of Status Competition On 'Winner-Take-All'Markets. Yearbook of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University, 17(1), 211-277.
  103. Selçuk Eti, H. (2022). The Relationship Between Women's Self-Confidence, and ConspicuousConsumption Tendency on Social Media The Relationship Between Women's Self-Confidence, and Conspicuous Consumption Tendency on Social Media. OPUS-Journal of Society Research, 19(46), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1091941. Go to original source...
  104. Shahpasandi, F., Zarei, A., &Nikabadi, M. S. (2020). Consumers' Impulse Buying Behavior on Instagram: Examining the Influence of Flow Experiences and Hedonic Browsing on Impulse Buying. Journal of Internet Commerce, 19(4), 437-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2020.1816324. Go to original source...
  105. Seeking Alpha. (2023). Macroeconomic and geopolitical risks to consider. Retrieved May, 2023 from Https://Seekingalpha.Com/Article/4545314-Lvmh-Macroeconomic-and-Geopolitical-Risks-to-Consider.
  106. Singh, S., Farley, S. D., & Donahue, J. J. (2018). Grandiosity on display: Social media behaviors and dimensions of narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.039. Go to original source...
  107. SMPERTH. (2022). 2023 Instagram Statistics - Everything You Need to Know from SMPerth. Retrieved January, 2023, from https://www.smperth.com/resources/instagram/instagram-statistics/.
  108. Sredl, K. C. (2004). "Balkan Barbie": Women and Consumer Culture in Post-Socialist Croatia". Association for Consumer Research. Conference of Gender, marketing and Consumer Behavior, Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.
  109. Statista. (2021). Influencer marketing spend of fashion luxury brands Europe 2021. Retrieved January, 2023 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1295351/miv-fashion-luxury-brands-influencer-marketing-europe/
  110. Statista. (2022). Social Media Statistics & Facts.Retrieved January, 2023 from https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/#dossierSummary.
  111. Statista. (2022). Internet usage in Central and Eastern Europe. Retrieved January, 2023, from. https://www.statista.com/study/31628/internet-usage-in-eastern-europe-statista-dossier/.
  112. Statcounter. (2022). Stats Europe, Social MediaStatcounter Global Stats. .Retrieved January, 2023, from https://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/europe.
  113. Stec, L. (1992). Review of How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed, by S. Drakuliæ. NWSA Journal, 4(3), 398-400.
  114. Shayeb, M. el, & Deeb, S. el. (2023). The mediating effect of luxury perception on the relationship between social media marketing and purchase intention of luxury jewellery brands. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 18(1), 28-57. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIMA.2023.128149. Go to original source...
  115. Taylor, D. G., & Strutton, D. (2016). Does Facebook usage lead to conspicuous consumption? Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(3), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2015-0009. Go to original source...
  116. Thoumrungroje, A. (2014). The Influence of Social Media Intensity and EWOM on Conspicuous Consumption. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.07.009. Go to original source...
  117. Thoumrungroje, A. (2018). A Cross-National Study of Consumer Spending Behavior: The Impact of Social Media Intensity and Materialism. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 30(4), 276-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2018.1462130. Go to original source...
  118. Triwidisari, A., Nurkhin, A., & Muhsin, M. (2018). The Relationships Between Instagram Social Media Usage, Hedonic Shopping Motives and Financial Literacy on Impulse Buying. Dinamika Pendidikan, 12(2), 170-181. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v12i2.13565. Go to original source...
  119. Veblen, T., & Galbraith, J. K. (1973). The theory of the leisure class (Vol. 1899). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  120. Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). A Review and a Conceptual Framework of Prestige-Seeking Consumer Behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, 1-15.
  121. Wallace, E., Cairnes, J. E., Buil, I., & Catalán, S. (2020). Facebook and luxury fashion: self-congruent posts and luxury purchase intentions. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 24(4), 571-588. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-09-2019-0215. Go to original source...
  122. Wang, Y., &Griskevicius, V. (2013). Conspicuous Consumption, Relationships and Rivals: Women's Luxury Products As Signals to Other Women. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 834-854.https://doi.org/10.1086/673256. Go to original source...
  123. We Are Social. (2022). More than 5 billion people now use the internet. Retrieved January, 2023, from https://wearesocial.com/au/blog/2022/04/more-than-5-billion-people-now-use-the-internet/.
  124. Widjajanta, B., Senen, S. H., Masharyono, M., Li̇snawati̇, L., &Anggraeni̇, C. P. (2018). The impact of social media usage and self-esteem on conspicuous consumption: Instagram user of Hijabers Community Bandung member. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 10(2), 1-13.
  125. Wong, N. Y. C. (1997). Suppose You Own the World and No One Knows? Conspicuous Consumption, Materialism and Self. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 197-203.
  126. Woods, W. A. (1960). Psychological dimensions of consumer decision. Journal of Marketing, 24(3), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224296002400303. Go to original source...
  127. Yenicioglu, B., &Suerdem, A. (2015).Participatory New Product Development-A Framework for Deliberately Collaborative and Continuous Innovation Design. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1443-1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.442. Go to original source...
  128. Zlateva, N. (2018). Brutalnite istini na sotsa: Defitsitni stoki i Korekom [Златева, Н. (2018). Бруталните истини за соца: Дефицитни стоки и Кореком]. Retrieved May, 2023 from https://www.flashnews.bg/brutalnite-istini-za-sotsa-defitsitni-stoki-i-korekom/

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.