Central European Business Review 2023, 12(4):77-103 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.333

Digitalization and Platformization in Romania Based on the Digital Platform Economy Index 2020

Stefan Apostol ORCID...1
1 University of Pecs, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Regional Policy and Economics, Pécs, Hungary, steffapostol@poliss.eu, e6j1lb@pte.hu

This article examines the Romanian digital platform economy. In particular, it discusses how this novel paradigm could help Romania adapt to new technological and structural conditions and participate in the upcoming industrial-digital revolution. It intends to investigate the bottlenecks in the country's platform economy. Moreover, it compares the health of the digital entrepreneurial ecosystem with that of neighbouring countries. So that Romania may achieve sustainable growth, it suggests ways to enhance the platform economy framework. The methodology and data analysed in the study are based on the Digital Platform Economy Index 2020. It combines 61 indicators from different sources in 24 variables, twelve for the digital environment and twelve for the entrepreneurial ecosystem. These variables comprise the twelve pillars. Providing a basis for comparison, they are a crucial component of the model. Lastly, the four sub-indices and the main super-index are calculated. Platform economies such as Romania lack technology transfer, financial facilitation and digital literacy, according to the research. Demand side issues, such as fewer companies operating online and utilizing cloud technologies and low consumer online purchases, inhibit the introduction of new online businesses and technologies. Digitalization of industrial processes is not a trend in Eastern European countries. It is important to note that the study is limited by using macro-level indicators. With no platform-specific examples, it generalizes the concept of the digital economy. As a study topic, the digital platform economy presented in this article is an emerging field of research.
Implications for Central European audience: This article identifies the bottlenecks in the digital platform economy in Central and Eastern European countries. Particularly, it emphasizes the necessity to improve digital literacy, the number of multi-sided platforms networking, as well as technological transfer pillars of the platform economy. It also compares several cross-country dimensions of the digital platform economy. The author theoretically proves the importance of changing business models and embracing digitization in order to move towards a platform economy. In addition to describing what platform economies are and what they are not, the article also discusses how platforms can be combined with traditional firms to maintain a constant economic growth rate.

Keywords: platform economy; digitalization; entrepreneurship; ecosystem
JEL classification: L26, N70, P27

Received: September 18, 2022; Revised: January 12, 2023; Accepted: February 7, 2023; Prepublished online: June 10, 2023; Published: September 29, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Apostol, S. (2023). Digitalization and Platformization in Romania Based on the Digital Platform Economy Index 2020. Central European Business Review12(4), 77-103. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.333
Download citation

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3 Go to original source...
  2. Acs, Z. J., Rappai, G., & Szerb, L. (2011). Index-Building in a System of Interdependent Variables: The Penalty for Bottleneck. GMU School of Public Policy Research Paper No. 2011-24. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1945346. Go to original source...
  3. Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016. Go to original source...
  4. Acs, Z., Szerb, L., & Autio, E. (2017). The Global Entrepreneurship Index. In Z. Acs, L. Szerb, & E. Autio, Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2016 (pp. 19-38). London: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63844-7_3. Go to original source...
  5. Acs, Z. J., Song, A. K., Szerb, L., Audretsch, D. B., & Komlósi, É. (2021). The evolution of the global digital platform economy: 1971-2021. Small Business Economics, 57(4), 1629-1659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00561-x. Go to original source...
  6. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451. Go to original source...
  7. Aghion, P., & Jaravel, X. (2015). Knowledge Spillovers, Innovation and Growth. The Economic Journal, 125(583), 533-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12199. Go to original source...
  8. Baumol, W. J. (1986). Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 1072-1085.
  9. Bãdoi, D. (2020). Ocuparea pe platformele digitale în contextul crizei COVID-19: Studiu de caz asupra personalului de livrare. Revista Calitatea Vieții, 31(2), 188-207. https://doi.org/10.46841/RCV.2020.02.05. Go to original source...
  10. Boston Consulting Group. (2019, January 16). Emerging Art of Ecosystem Management. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/emerging-art-ecosystem-management
  11. Brynjolfsson, E., & Saunders, A. (2009). Wired for Innovation: How Information Technology Is Reshaping the Economy. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press. Go to original source...
  12. Cairncross, F. (2002). The company of the future: How the communications revolution is changing management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Go to original source...
  13. Cámara, N. (2018). DiGiX 2018: A Multidimensional Index of Digitization, BBVA Research.
  14. Campos, J. E., & Root, H. (1996). The key to the Asian miracle. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  15. CER, 2021. Romania 33, Centre for European Reform. Retrieved April 23, 2022, from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2206279/romania-33/2962641/. Go to original source...
  16. Chakravorti, B., & Chaturvedi, R.S. (2017). Digital Planet 2017: How Competitiveness and Trust in Digital Economies Vary across the World. Medford: The Fletcher School, Tufts University.
  17. Chakravorti, B., Tunnard, C., & Chaturvedi, R. S. (2015). Where the Digital Economy Is Moving the Fastest. Harvard Business Review, 19,1-7.
  18. De Meyer, A., & Williamson, P. J. (2020). Ecosystem edge: Sustaining competitiveness in the face of disruption. Stanford. California: Stanford University Press. Go to original source...
  19. European Commission. (2018). Digital Economy and Society Index 2018 Report: Shaping Europe's digital future. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-economy-and-society-index-2018-report
  20. European Commission. (2021). Digital Economy and Society Index 2021: Shaping Europe's digital future. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-economy-and-society-index-desi-2021
  21. Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The New Economics of Multisided Platforms. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press. Go to original source...
  22. Gheorghe, G. I. (2020). The Development of Intelligent Industry in Romania. International Journal of Modeling and Optimization, 10(6), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMO.2020.V10.767. Go to original source...
  23. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation: Platforms and Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105. Go to original source...
  24. Giones, F., & Brem, A. (2017). Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5), 44-51. Go to original source...
  25. Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3-43. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452. Go to original source...
  26. Hänninen, M., Smedlund, A., & Mitronen, L. (2018). Digitalization in retailing: Multisided platforms as drivers of industry transformation. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(2), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2017-0109. Go to original source...
  27. Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Policy, 47(8), 1391-1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.019. Go to original source...
  28. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.73. Go to original source...
  29. Hobijn, B., & Jovanovic, B. (2001). The information-technology revolution and the stock market: Evidence. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1203-1220. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1203. Go to original source...
  30. Fischer-Galati, S. (2019). Romania's development as a Communist state. In Romania in the 1980s (pp. 4-16). Routledge. Go to original source...
  31. Johnson, N., & Markey-Towler, B. (2020). Economics of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Internet, Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  32. Kelly, K. (1998). New rules for the new economy: 10 radical strategies for a connected world. New York: Viking. Go to original source...
  33. Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The Rise of the Platform Economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32, 61-69.
  34. Lafuente, E., & Rabetino, R. (2011). Human capital and growth in Romanian small firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1), 74-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111106442. Go to original source...
  35. Lafuente, E., Szerb, L., & Acs, Z. J. (2016). Country level efficiency and national systems of entrepreneurship: A data envelopment analysis approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1260-1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9440-9. Go to original source...
  36. Lang, N., von Szczepanski, K., & Wurzer, C. (2019). The emerging art of ecosystem management. Boston Conulting Group, 1-20.
  37. Locke, R. M., & Wellhausen, R. L. (2014). Production in the Innovation Economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Go to original source...
  38. McKinsey Global Institute. (2016). Digital Europe: Pushing The Frontier, Capturing The Benefits. New York: McKinsey Company.
  39. McKinsey Global Institute. (2015). The Internet of Things: Mapping the value beyond the hype. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-internet-of-things-the-value-of-digitizing-the-physical-world
  40. Mateus, A. (2016). DESI/I-DESI Digital Economy and Society Index. European Commission,
  41. Brussels.
  42. North, D. C. (1971). Institutional Change and Economic Growth. The Journal of Economic History, 31(1), 118-125. Go to original source...
  43. Nicolae, M., Ion, I., & Nicolae, E. (2016). Regional differences in entrepreneurial perceptions and implications for the Romanian competitiveness policy. Management & Marketing, 11(1), 394-409. https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2016-0005. Go to original source...
  44. OECD (2022), OECD Economic Surveys: Romania 2022, OECD Publishing, Paris,
  45. https://doi.org/10.1787/e2174606-en. Go to original source...
  46. Parker, G. G., Alstyne, M. W. V., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  47. Perez, C. (2010). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep051. Go to original source...
  48. Pînzaru, F., Anghel, L., & Mihalcea, A. (2017). Sustainable management in the new economy: Are Romanian companies ready for the digital challenge? In Zanele, N., & Thabang, M. (Eds.), IGMLG 2017 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance (pp. 346-352). Saint Petgersburg, Russia.
  49. Pîrvu, B. C., & Zamfirescu, C. B. (2017). Smart factory in the context of 4th industrial revolution: challenges and opportunities for Romania. In IOP conference series: Materials science and engineering, 227(1), 012094. Go to original source...
  50. Polk, W. R. (2018). Crusade and jihad: The thousand-year war between the Muslim world and the global north. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Go to original source...
  51. Prahalad, C. K., & Krishnan, M. S. (2008). The new age of innovation: Driving cocreated value through global networks. McGraw-Hill.
  52. Próchniak, M. (2011). Determinants of economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe: The global crisis perspective. Post-Communist Economies, 23(4), 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2011.622566. Go to original source...
  53. Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020). Digital Literacy: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Technoethics, 11(2), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.20200701.oa1. Go to original source...
  54. Rifkin, J. (2011). The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  55. Rifkin, J. (2017). The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York: St. Martin´s Press.
  56. Rivza, B., Kruzmetra, M., Gudele, I., & Foris, D. (2019). Digitalization as an essential growth factor contributing in SME development (experience of Latvia and Romania). Agronomy Research, 17(1), 261-270. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.19.030. Go to original source...
  57. Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212. Go to original source...
  58. Rodrik, D. (2021). Prospects for global economic convergence under new technologies. In Paper presented at the Brookings Institution's Global Forum on Democracy and Technology.
  59. Root, H. L. (2020). Network Origins of the Global Economy: East vs. West in a Complex Systems Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  60. Rysman, M. (2009). The Economics of Two-Sided Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.3.125 Go to original source...
  61. Sãgeatã, R., Mitricã, B., & Mocanu, I. (2021). Centralized Industrialization in the Memory of Places. Case Studies of Romanian Cities. Societies, 11(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11040132 Go to original source...
  62. Sinozic, T., Bergman, E. M., & Moran, N. (2015). Evidence-based policy research to inform the European Neighbourhood Policy framework: Five recommendations for Europe and its neighbours. The International Spectator, 50(3), 88-102. Go to original source...
  63. Song, A. K. (2019). The Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem-A critique and reconfiguration. Small Business Economics, 53(3), 569-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00232-y. Go to original source...
  64. Steinfeld, E. S. (2004). China's Shallow Integration: Networked Production and the New Challenges for Late Industrialization. World Development, 32(11), 1971-1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.04.003. Go to original source...
  65. Suciu, C., Handra, A. D., Rada, A. C., & Uțu, I. (2021). Industrialization 4.0-The digital revolution which redefines production. Annals of'Constantin Brancusi'University of Targu-Jiu. Engineering Series (4).
  66. Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5. Go to original source...
  67. Stãncioiu, A. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution 'Industry 4.0'. Fiabilitate ªi Durabilitate, 1(19), 74-78.
  68. Szerb, L., Lafuente, E., Horváth, K., & Páger, B. (2019). The relevance of quantity and quality entrepreneurship for regional performance: The moderating role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1308-1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1510481. Go to original source...
  69. Szerb, L., Somogyine Komlosi, E., Acs, Z. J., Lafuente, E., & Song, A. K. (2022). The Digital Platform Economy Index 2020. Cham, Germany: Springer International Publishing. Go to original source...
  70. Turnock, D. (1970). The Pattern of Industrialization in Romania. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 60(3), 540-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1970.tb00740.x. Go to original source...
  71. Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447-504. https://doi.org/10.1086/432782. Go to original source...
  72. Ullah, B. (2020). Financial constraints, corruption, and SME growth in transition economies. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 75, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.05.009. Go to original source...
  73. Varga, A., Járosi, P., Sebestyén, T., & Basar, M. (2013). Detailed Policy Impact Model. Report of the SEARCH FP7 Project.
  74. Vogel, P. (2013). Building and assessing entrepreneurial ecosystems. In Presentation to OECD LEED Programme Workshop on Entrepreneurial ecosystems and Growth-oriented entrepreneurship, The Hague, 7.
  75. Vrabie, E. (2022). What is holding Romania back from growing tech unicorns locally? Go to original source...
  76. Retrieved April 23, 2022, from https://therecursive.com/what-is-holding-romania-back-from-growing-tech-unicorns-locally/.
  77. Westerlund, M., Leminen, S., & Rajahonka, M. (2014). Designing Business Models for the Internet of Things. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(7), 5-14. Go to original source...
  78. World Bank. (2022). Employment in industry (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate) [Data set]. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.IND.EMPL.ZS
  79. World Trade Organization (2019). World Trade Report 2019: The future of services trade. Switzerland: World Trade Organization. Go to original source...
  80. Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022). Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 729-778. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998948. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.