Central European Business Review 2023, 12(2):87-104 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.322

Invisible Foundations of Collaboration in the Workplace: a Multiplex Network Approach to Advice Seeking and Knowledge Sharing

Máté Baksa ORCID...1, Imre Branyiczki ORCID...2
1 Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Organizational Behaviour, Budapest, Hungary, mate.baksa@uni-corvinus.hu
2 Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Organizational Behaviour, Budapest, Hungary, imre.branyiczki@uni-corvinus.hu

The revolutionary advancement of technology in the past decade brought the attention of academics and management practitioners to ways of improving innovative capabilities of organizations. Advice-seeking relationships have an essential role in the knowledge production of modern-day organizations as they enable actors to acquire information, professional support and knowledge elements that they can recombine to form new knowledge. This paper conceptualizes advice-seeking behaviour as part of an inherently complex social world that can best be captured by a multiplex approach to organizational network research. It investigates how different layers of interpersonal relationships in the workplace may contribute to the appearance of advice-seeking interactions. This study examines the cases of three knowledge-intensive organizations and applies binary logistic regression to shed light on the yet invisible relational foundations of workplace collaboration.
Implications for Central European audience: Central European countries attempt to improve their economic competitiveness by attracting knowledge-intensive companies as well as incentivizing innovation and digital transformation. Knowledge-intensive firms, such as business service centres or information and communication technology companies, are significant contributors to the economic output of countries such as the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Recommendations derived from the results of this paper provide insights into the leadership of knowledge-intensive companies regarding creation of organizational environments that foster knowledge sharing and innovation. Measures that promote interpersonal trust, visibility of expertise and boundary-spanning behaviour are recommended.

Keywords: Knowledge networks; advice seeking; knowledge sharing; dyadic analysis; multiplexity
JEL classification: D85, M10, M12

Received: June 29, 2022; Revised: September 17, 2022; Accepted: September 27, 2022; Prepublished online: November 26, 2022; Published: May 25, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Baksa, M., & Branyiczki, I. (2023). Invisible Foundations of Collaboration in the Workplace: a Multiplex Network Approach to Advice Seeking and Knowledge Sharing. Central European Business Review, 12(2), 87-104. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.322
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Agneessens, F., Trincado-Munoz, F. J., & Koskinen, J. (2022). Network formation in organizational settings: Exploring the importance of local social processes and team-level contextual variables in small groups using bayesian hierarchical ERGMs. Social Networks (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2022.07.001 Go to original source...
    2. Agneessens, F., & Wittek, R. (2012). Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Social Networks, 34(3), 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.04.002 Go to original source...
    3. Ajimati, M. O., Whelan, E., Aalbers, R., Morgan, L., & Kranenburg, H. van. (2022). The effect of advice network connectedness on problem-solving competence among software developers. Journal of Systems and Software, 194, 111489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111489 Go to original source...
    4. Ajmal, M., Helo, P., & Kekäle, T. (2010). Critical factors for knowledge management in project business. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015633 Go to original source...
    5. Ajmal, M., & Koskinen, K. U. (2008). Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: An organizational culture perspective. Project Management Journal, 39(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20031 Go to original source...
    6. Aldrich, J. O., & Cunningham, J. B. (2016). Using IBM SPSS Statistics (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
    7. Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge Work and Knowledge-Intensive Firms. New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    8. Bencsik, A., & Juhász, T. (2020). Informal knowledge sharing. Gossip in workplaces. (Informális tudásmegosztás. A munkahelyi pletyka.) Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review, 51(7-8), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2020.07-08.08 Go to original source...
    9. Bessenyei, I. (2005). A diary on network teaching. (Napló a hálózati tanításról). Információs Társadalom, 5(3), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.v.2005.3.4 Go to original source...
    10. Borgatti, S. P., Brass, D. J., & Halgin, D. S. (2014). Social Network Research: Confusions, Criticisms, and Controversies. In Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks (pp. 1-29). https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x(2014)0000040001 Go to original source...
    11. Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428 Go to original source...
    12. Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On Network Theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168-1181. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641 Go to original source...
    13. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network Analysis in the Social Sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892-895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821 Go to original source...
    14. Brennecke, J., & Rank, O. N. (2016). The interplay between formal project memberships and informal advice seeking in knowledge-intensive firms: A multilevel network approach. Social Networks, 44, 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.02.004 Go to original source...
    15. Causholli, M., Floyd, T., Jenkins, N. T., & Soltis, S. M. (2021). The ties that bind: Knowledge-seeking networks and auditor job performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 92, 101239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101239 Go to original source...
    16. Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2001a). Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network. Social Networks, 23(3), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8733(01)00041-7 Go to original source...
    17. Cross, R., Rice, R. E., & Parker, A. (2001b). Information Seeking in Social Context: Structural Influences and Receipt of Information Benefits. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and Reviews, 31(4), 438-448. https://doi.org/10.1109/5326.983927 Go to original source...
    18. Csedő, Z., & Zavarkó, M. (2020). The role of inter-organizational innovation networks as change drivers in commercialization of disruptive technologies: The case of power-to-gas. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 28, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.3388 Go to original source...
    19. Flynn, F. J., & Lake, V. K. B. (2008). If You Need Help, Just Ask: Underestimating Compliance With Direct Requests for Help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.128 Go to original source...
    20. Gondal, N. (2022). Multiplexity as a lens to investigate the cultural meanings of interpersonal ties. Social Networks, 68, 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.07.002 Go to original source...
    21. Harrigan, N. M., Labianca, G. (Joe), & Agneessens, F. (2020). Negative ties and signed graphs research: Stimulating research on dissociative forces in social networks. Social Networks, 60, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.09.004 Go to original source...
    22. Harrigan, N. M., & Yap, J. (2017). Avoidance in negative ties: Inhibiting closure, reciprocity, and homophily. Social Networks, 48, 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.07.003 Go to original source...
    23. Hortoványi, L., & Szabó, R. Z. (2006). Knowledge and Organization: A Network Perspective. Society and Economy, 28(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1556/socec.28.2006.2.6 Go to original source...
    24. King, M. (2021). Social Chemistry: Decoding the Elements of Human Connection. USA: Dutton. Go to original source...
    25. Labianca, G. (2014). Negative Ties in Organizational Networks. In Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks (pp. 239-259). https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x(2014)0000040012 Go to original source...
    26. Lazega, E., Bar-Hen, A., Barbillon, P., & Donnet, S. (2016). Effects of competition on collective learning in advice networks. Social Networks, 47, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.04.001 Go to original source...
    27. Leinhardt, S. (1977). Social Networks: A Developing Paradigm. Social Networks, xiii-xxxiv. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-442450-0.50006-7 Go to original source...
    28. Leonardi, P. M. (2015). Ambient Awareness and Knowledge Acquisition: Using Social Media to Learn "Who Knows What" and "Who Knows Whom." MIS Quarterly, 39(4), 747-762. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2015/39.4.1 Go to original source...
    29. Marineau, J. E., & Labianca, G. (2021). Positive and negative tie perceptual accuracy: Pollyanna principle vs. negative asymmetry explanations. Social Networks, 64, 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.07.008 Go to original source...
    30. Marineau, J. E., Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., Borgatti, S. P., & Vecchi, P. (2018). Individuals' power and their social network accuracy: A situated cognition perspective. Social Networks, 54, 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.01.006 Go to original source...
    31. Mattar, L., Higgins, S. S. S., & Neves, J. A. B. (2022). Diversity and autonomy in the structuration of a multilevel organizational social network in a technology park. Social Networks, 68, 346-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.08.009 Go to original source...
    32. Mendoza-Silva, A. (2021). Innovation capability: A sociometric approach. Social Networks, 64, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.08.004 Go to original source...
    33. Midi, H., Sarkar, S. K., & Rana, S. (2010). Collinearity diagnostics of binary logistic regression model. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 13(3), 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2010.10700699 Go to original source...
    34. Minbaeva, D. B. (2007). Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 47(4), 567-593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0030-4 Go to original source...
    35. Mirc, N., & Parker, A. (2020). If you do not know who knows what: Advice seeking under changing conditions of uncertainty after an acquisition. Social Networks, 61, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.08.006 Go to original source...
    36. Natu, S., & Aparicio, M. (2022). Analyzing knowledge sharing behaviors in virtual teams: Practical evidence from digitalized workplaces. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100248 Go to original source...
    37. Nebus, J. (2006). Building Collegial Information Networks: A Theory of Advice Network Generation. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 615-637. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318921 Go to original source...
    38. Odei, S. A., & Stejskal, J. (2018). The Influence of Knowledge Sources on Firm-Level Innovation: The Case of Slovak and Hungarian Manufacturing Firms. Central European Business Review, 7(2), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.199 Go to original source...
    39. Pereira, V., & Bamel, U. (2021). Extending the resource and knowledge based view: A critical analysis into its theoretical evolution and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 132, 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.021 Go to original source...
    40. Phelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1115-1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640 Go to original source...
    41. Robins, G. L. (2015). Doing Social Network Research: Network-based Research Design for Social Scientists. SAGE Publications. Go to original source...
    42. ©kerlavaj, M., Dimovski, V., & Desouza, K. C. (2010). Patterns and Structures of Intra-organizational Learning Networks within a Knowledge-Intensive Organization. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.3 Go to original source...
    43. ©kudienė, V., Autytė-Kvedaravičienė, I., & Gabrielaityte, U. (2020). Knowledge Management and Perceived Organisational Innovativeness in Global Organisations. Central European Business Review, 10(3), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.260 Go to original source...
    44. Snow, C. C., & Fjeldstad, Ø. D. (2015). Network Paradigm: Applications in Organizational Science. In J. D. Wright, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 546-550). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.73107-2 Go to original source...
    45. Swift, P. E., & Hwang, A. (2013). The impact of affective and cognitive trust on knowledge sharing and organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 20(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471311288500 Go to original source...
    46. Szász, L., Rácz, B.-G., Scherrer, M., & Deflorin, P. (2019). Disseminative capabilities and manufacturing plant roles in the knowledge network of MNCs. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 294-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.004 Go to original source...
    47. Szvetelszky, Z., & Bodor-Eranus, E. (2020). The nature of gossip. (A pletyka természete.) Budapest: Typotex.
    48. Treglown, L., & Furnham, A. (2020). Birds of a feather work together: The role of emotional intelligence and cognitive ability in workplace interaction and advice networks. Personality and Individual Differences, 158, 109833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109833 Go to original source...
    49. Wang, N., Wang, L., Ma, Z., & Wang, S. (2022). From knowledge seeking to knowledge contribution: A social capital perspective on knowledge sharing behaviors in online Q&A communities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121864 Go to original source...
    50. Whitehead, K. K., Zacharia, Z. G., & Prater, E. L. (2016). Absorptive capacity versus distributive capability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(10), 1308-1332. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-06-2015-0379 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content