Central European Business Review 2022, 11(3):97-125 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.295

Understanding the Budapest Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Human Capital Flows and Social Capital Ties

Loretta Huszák1, Tim Gittins ORCID...2
1 Institute for the Development of Enterprises, Corvinus University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary, loretta.huszak@uni-corvinus.hu
2 Institute for the Development of Enterprises, Corvinus University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary, tim.gittins@uni-corvinus.hu

Socio-economic transition in the CEE (Central and Eastern Europe) region in recent decades forms the operating context for young entrepreneurial ecosystems. This study has the aim of analysing institutional and cognitive features of CEE ecosystem development by considering Budapest as a prime example of an urban entrepreneurial ecosystem. Alongside the analysis of event registration data, a qualitative research approach is deployed featuring semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs and other institutional actors attending a networking event in Budapest. The methodological foundation for this approach is adapted from Triple Helix ecosystem theory. A conceptual model is produced from the research process, and ecosystem theory is developed by accounting for dynamic human capital flows and social capital ties do not present in the original Triple Helix theory. Results primarily indicate moderate levels of asset values and that attendance by entrepreneurs is largely motivated by locating start-up funding. Prime outcomes of interviews are a lack of innovation-focused specific human capital and increasingly market-based means of social capital development. Furthermore, the findings presented as propositions assume a partial virtual nature for human capital flows and social capital ties between ecosystem actors. On this basis, the resulting conceptual model accounts for the presence of digitalisation. Thus, ongoing entrepreneurial ecosystem development entails continual institutional adaption to information technology-driven socio-economic conditions. The Budapest ecosystem would, however, need to acquire a stronger virtual aspect in order to realise greater growth potential.
Implications for Central European audience: While research on entrepreneurial ecosystems has gained strength, it has barely been applied to the CEE region. This study represents a formative attempt in this regard whereby the resulting conceptual model may be used to empirically evaluate entrepreneurial ecosystems within the region by comparing specific internal and external human and social capital movements. The model primarily implies that digitally derived human and social capital would require deeper integration between start-up firms and institutional actors. Crucially, there is also an implicit need for institutions to develop digitalised infrastructure more intensively in order to nurture innovative start-up activity in the CEE region.

Keywords: Entrepreneurial Ecosystems; CEE Region; Innovative Start-ups
JEL classification: L26, M13

Received: September 20, 2021; Revised: September 20, 2021; Accepted: October 8, 2021; Prepublished online: December 30, 2021; Published: July 18, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Huszák, L., & Gittins, T. (2022). Understanding the Budapest Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Human Capital Flows and Social Capital Ties. Central European Business Review, 11(3), 97-125. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.295
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Acs, Z., Stam, E., Audretsch, D., & O'Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8 Go to original source...
    2. Andrews, R. (2010). Organizational social capital, structure and performance. Human Relations, 63(5), 583-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709342931 Go to original source...
    3. Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E., & Menter, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 313-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4 Go to original source...
    4. Aulet, W. (2013). Disciplined Entrepreneurship : 24 Steps to a Successful Startup, John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.
    5. Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266 Go to original source...
    6. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital. Columbia University Press, New York.
    7. Belas, J., Rahman, A., Rahman, M. T., & Schonfeld, J. (2017). Financial Constraints on Innovative SMEs: Empirical Evidence from the Visegrad Countries. Engineering Economics, 28(5), 552-563. Go to original source...
    8. Bhawe, N., & Zahra, S. A. (2019). Inducing heterogeneity in local entrepreneurial ecosystems: the role of MNEs, Small Business Economics, 52(2), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9954-7 Go to original source...
    9. Békés, G., Kleinert, J., & Toubal, F. (2006). Spillovers from multinationals to heterogeneous domestic firms: Evidence from Hungary. Discussion Paper No. 2006/16. Budapest: Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 32(10), 1408-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01179.x. Go to original source...
    10. Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The Startup Owner's Manual: The Step-by-step Guide for Building a Great Company, K&S Ranch.
    11. Brajkovic, L. (2018). Human Capital Investment or Academic Marginalism? Understanding the Influence of Political Economy on Higher Education in Post-Socialist Europe, Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(2), 151-175. Go to original source...
    12. Brown, R., & Mawson, S. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and public policy in action: a critique of the latest industrial policy blockbuster. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(3), 347-368. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz011 Go to original source...
    13. Cantner, U., Cunningham, J. A., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a dynamic lifecycle model. Small Business Economics: An Entrepreneurship Journal, 1-17. Go to original source...
    14. Carvalho, N., & Yordanova, Z. (2018). Why say no to innovation? Evidence from industrial SMEs in the European Union. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation,13 (2), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242018000200043 Go to original source...
    15. Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Balocco, R. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(4), 1291-1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3 Go to original source...
    16. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
    17. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331. Go to original source...
    18. Dvouletý, O., & Orel, M. (2020). Determinants of solo and employer entrepreneurship in Visegrád countries: findings from the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 14 (3), 447-464. Go to original source...
    19. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385 Go to original source...
    20. Engle, A. D., Zaharie, M., Kerekes, K., & Poór, J. (2020). Who is in Charge Here? Evidence of the Division of Roles and Responsibilities Between Global and Local HR Managers in MNEs Operating in the CEE Region. Journal of East-West Business, 26(1), 81-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2019.1689218 Go to original source...
    21. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. Go to original source...
    22. European Commission. (2005). The new SME definition: User guide and model declaration. In European Commission (Eds.), Enterprise and industry publications (p. 14). Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/sme_definition/sme_user_guide_en.pdf
    23. Eurostat. (2015). Statistics on small and medium sized enterprises, Eurostat, Brussels, ISSN 2443-8219.
    24. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Statistics_on_small_and_medium
    25. sized_enterprises
    26. Földvári, P., & van Leeuwen, B. (2005). An Estimation of the Human Capital Stock in Eastern and Central Europe. Eastern European Economics, 43(6), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.2753/EEE0012-8755430603 Go to original source...
    27. Goswami, K., Mitchell, J. R., & Bhagavatula, S., (2018). Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, March 2018, 12(1), 117-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1281 Go to original source...
    28. Gubik, A. S., & Farkas, S. (2016). Student Entrepreneurship in Hungary: Selected Results Based on GUESSS Survey. Entrepreneurial Business & Economics Review, 4(4),123-139. Go to original source...
    29. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods,18 (1),59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 Go to original source...
    30. Hoogendoorn, B., Rud, I., Groot, W., & Brink, H. (2019). The effects of human capital interventions on entrepreneurial performance in industrialized countries. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33 (3), 798-826. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12308. Go to original source...
    31. Ienciu, N. M., & Ienciu, I.-A. (2015). Brain drain in Central and Eastern Europe: new insights on the role of public policy. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea, 15(3), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2015.1050799 Go to original source...
    32. Invest Europe. (2019). Central and Eastern Europe Private Equity Statistics, 2018. https://www.investeurope.eu/media/2630/ie_cee_report_2018_final.pdf
    33. Isenberg, D. J. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, Dublin, 2011.
    34. Johannessen, J.-A. & Olsen, B. (2010). The future of value creation and innovations: Aspects of a theory of value creation and innovation in a global knowledge economy, International Journal of Information Management, 30(6), 502-511. Go to original source...
    35. Jude, C., & Silaghi, M. I. P. (2016). Employment effects of foreign direct investment: New evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. International Economics (2110-7017), 145, 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2015.02.003 Go to original source...
    36. Jurajda, ©., & Terrell, K. (2010). Regional unemployment and human capital in transition economies. Economics of Transition, 17(2), 241-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2009.00351.x Go to original source...
    37. Kállay, L., & Jáki, E. (2019). The impact of state intervention on the Hungarian venture capital market. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraľivanja, 33(1), 1130-1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1629979 Go to original source...
    38. Karsai, J. (2018). Government venture capital in Central and Eastern Europe. Venture Capital, 20(1), 73-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2018.1411040 Go to original source...
    39. Kim, P., & Aldrich, H. (2005). Social capital and entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 55-104. Go to original source...
    40. Kornai, J. (2006). The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe. Economics of Transition, 14(2), 207-244. Go to original source...
    41. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (Hungarian Central Statistical Office) (2020). Data on New IT Business Registrations in Budapest, http://statinfo.ksh.hu/Statinfo/themeSelector.jsp?〈=en
    42. Kovac, D., Scrbec, N., & Podobnik, B. (2018). Does it payoff to research economics? - A tale of citation, knowledge and economic growth in transition countries. Physica A, 505, 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.171 Go to original source...
    43. Küttim, M., Kallaste, M., & Venesaar, U. (2014). Entrepreneurship Education at University Level and Students' Entrepreneurial Intentions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110(24), 658-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.910 Go to original source...
    44. Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, L. (2011). The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601111 Go to original source...
    45. Miller, D., & Acs, Z. (2017). The campus as entrepreneurial ecosystem: The University of Chicago. Small Business Economics, 49 (1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9868-4 Go to original source...
    46. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,1(2),13-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202 Go to original source...
    47. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.533225 Go to original source...
    48. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5),.537-554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00097.x Go to original source...
    49. Ouimet, P., & Zarutskie, R. (2014). Who works for startups? The relation between firm age, employee age, and growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(3), 386-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.03.003 Go to original source...
    50. Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003 Go to original source...
    51. Petersen, A. M., & Puliga, M. (2017). High-skilled labour mobility in Europe before and after the 2004 enlargement. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 14(128), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0030 Go to original source...
    52. Prashantham, S., & Kumar, K. (2011). How do new ventures in MNC ecosystems proactively overcome interfirm asymmetries? IIMB Management Review (Elsevier Science), 23(3), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2011.06.001 Go to original source...
    53. Prashantham, S., & Kumar, K. (2019). Engaging with startups: MNC perspectives. IIMB Management Review (Elsevier Science). 31(4), 407-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.01.003 Go to original source...
    54. Precup, M. (2017). Venture Capital and Leveraged Buyout: What Is the Difference in Eastern Europe? - A Cross-Country Panel Data Analysis. Romanian Journal of European Affairs,17(2), 30-55.
    55. Radinger-Peer, V., Sedlacek, S., & Goldstein, H. (2018). The path-dependent evolution of the entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) - dynamics and region-specific assets of the case of Vienna (Austria). European Planning Studies, 26(8), 1499-1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1494136 Go to original source...
    56. Radoąević, S. (2017). Upgrading technology in Central and Eastern European Economies. IZA World of Labor. 338, 1-11. Go to original source...
    57. Ries, E. (2013). The Lean Startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses? Crown Business, New York
    58. Roundy, P. T., & Bayer, M. A. (2019). To bridge or buffer? A resource dependence theory of nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems, Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 11(4), 550-575. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-06-2018-0064 Go to original source...
    59. Sansone, G., Andreotti, P., Colombelli, A., & Landoni, P. (2020). Are social incubators different from other incubators? Evidence from Italy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120132 Go to original source...
    60. Sansone, G., Ughetto, E., & Landoni, P. (2021). Entrepreneurial intention: An analysis of the role of Student-Led Entrepreneurial Organizations. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-021-00288-6 Go to original source...
    61. Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268 Go to original source...
    62. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 Go to original source...
    63. Stojčić, N. (2020). Collaborative innovation in emerging innovation systems: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09792-8 Go to original source...
    64. Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5 Go to original source...
    65. Szerb, L., Lafuente, E., Horvath, K., & Pager, B. (2019). The relevance of quantity and quality entrepreneurship for regional performance: the moderating role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Regional Studies,53(9), 1308-1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1510481 Go to original source...
    66. Tenca, F., Croce, A., & Ughetto, E. (2018). Business angels research in entrepreneurial finance: A literature review and a research agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(5), 1384-1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12224 Go to original source...
    67. Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 341-358. Go to original source...
    68. Walsh, K. (2019). Regional capability emergence in an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 8(3), 359-383. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-04-2019-0030 Go to original source...
    69. Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional Perspectives on Entrepreneurial Behavior in Challenging Environments". Journal of Small Business Management, 49 (1), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00317.x Go to original source...
    70. Wright, M., Siegel, D. S., & Mustar, P. (2017). An Emerging Ecosystem for Student Start-Ups. Journal of Technology Transfer,42 (4): 909-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9558-z Go to original source...
    71. Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2021). Toward an entrepreneurial ecosystem research program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 00 (0), 1-50 https://doi.org/1042258721998948 Go to original source...
    72. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 6th edition.
    73. Zetzsche, D., & Preiner, C. (2018). Cross-Border Crowdfunding: Towards a Single Crowdlending and Crowdinvesting Market for Europe. European Business Organization Law Review, 19(2), 217-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-0110-x Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content