Central European Business Review 2021, 10(5):53-79 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.273

State-Business Relations from the Perspective of the Companies' Preparedness for the Changes Related to the Implementation of the Industry 4.0 Elements: A Case of the Czech Republic

Květa Olšanová ORCID...1, Eva Křenková ORCID...2, Pavel Hnát ORCID...3, Ondřej Vilikus ORCID...4
1 Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of International Relations, Department of International Business, Prague, Czech Republic, kveta.olsanova@vse.cz
2 Eva Křenková / Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of International Relations, Department of International Business, Prague, Czech Republic, eva.krenkova@vse.cz
3 Pavel Hnát / Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of International Relations, Department of International Economic Relations, Prague, Czech Republic, pavel.hnat@vse.cz
4 Ondřej Vilikus / Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Department of Statistics and Probability, Prague, Czech Republic, ondrej.vilikus@vse.cz

The purpose of this study is to investigate the expectations of the management of different industries in the Czech Republic related to governmental support for their implementation of Industry 4.0 and their preparedness for the challenges associated with these technological changes. Mixed research, specifically exploratory sequential design, was used. The findings of qualitative data analyses from in-depth semi-structured interviews (n=41) with representatives of different industry sectors formed subsequent quantitative data collection (N=146, the board of management members representing various industries) through survey items corresponding with formalized research questions. The findings revealed a strong group of companies already implementing Industry 4.0 elements (85% of respondents) driven by companies with 250+ employees. As perceived by the management, the critical threat related to the workforce is a lack of skilled labour. Managers tend to prefer a transparent business environment without state interventions or interventions targeted to strategic state industries, preferably to the spheres of education, research & development, energy sector, sustainable agriculture, and healthcare. The results indicate that the easier administration and education reform are among the companies' boldest expectations from the government, among general conditions for current business.
Implications for the Central European audience: Central European companies face challenges related to implementing the Industry 4.0 elements. Therefore, the findings that aim to contribute to the debate addressing administration simplification, business environment transparency, and reform of the education system are considered relevant for the CE audience.

Keywords: state-business relations; Industry 4.0; Government support; subsidies
JEL classification: H25, H52, L25, M10, O33

Received: November 2, 2020; Revised: March 12, 2021; Accepted: April 2, 2021; Prepublished online: June 19, 2021; Published: December 6, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Olšanová, K., Křenková, E., Hnát, P., & Vilikus, O. (2021). State-Business Relations from the Perspective of the Companies' Preparedness for the Changes Related to the Implementation of the Industry 4.0 Elements: A Case of the Czech Republic. Central European Business Review, 10(5), 53-79. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.273
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aiello, F., Albanese, G., & Piselli, P. (2019). Good value for public money? The case of R&D policy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(6), 1057-1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.02.006 Go to original source...
    2. Anaya, L., Dulaimi, M., & Abdallah, S. (2015). An investigation into the role of enterprise information systems in enabling business innovation. Business Process Management Journal, 21(4), 771-790. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2014-0108 Go to original source...
    3. Ayşe Göksu, Ö., Ergün, E., Ammari, D., & Görener, A. (2018). How Industry 4.0 Changes Business: A Commercial Perspective. International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 4(1), 84-95.
    4. Barbosa, N., & Silva, F. (2018). Public financial support and firm-specific characteristics: evidence from Portugal. European Planning Studies, 670-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1417358 Go to original source...
    5. Basl, J., & Kopp, J. (2017). Study of the Readiness of Czech Companies to the Industry 4.0. Journal of Systems Integration, 8(3), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.20470/jsi.v8i3.313 Go to original source...
    6. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877 Go to original source...
    7. Buigues, P.-A., & Sekkat, K. (2011). Public Subsidies to Business: An International Comparison. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 11(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-010-0074-1 Go to original source...
    8. Busom, I., Corchuelo, B., & Martínez-Ros, E. (2014). Tax incentives… or subsidies for business R&D? Small Business Economics, 43, 571-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9569-1 Go to original source...
    9. Carvalho, A. (2011). Why are tax incentives increasingly used to promote private R&D? Working Paper (4).
    10. Confederation of Industry of the Czech Republic. (2019). Výsledky průzkumu SP ČR o zavádění Průmyslu 4.0 ve firmách. Retrieved September 8, 2020, from https://www.spcr.cz/aktivity/z-hospodarske-politiky/13110-vysledky-pruzkumu-sp-cr-o-zavadeni-prumyslu-4-0-ve-firmach
    11. Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. P., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced Mixed Methods Research Designs. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    12. Czarnitzki, D., & Delanote, J. (2015). R&D policies for young SMEs: input and output effects. Small Business Economics, 45, 465-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9661-1 Go to original source...
    13. Czech Statistical Office. (2018). V IT je nedostatek odborníků. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/v-it-je-nedostatek-odborniku
    14. Czech Statistical Office. (2019). Ukazatele výzkumu a vývoje - 2018. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/ukazatele-vyzkumu-a-vyvoje-2018
    15. Czech Statistical Office. (2020). Innovation Activities of Enterprises - 2016 - 2018. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/inovacni-aktivity-podniku-20162018
    16. CzechInvest. (2020). CzechInvest - Business and Investment Development Agency. Retrieved August 3, 2020, from https://www.czechinvest.org/en/About-CzechInvest/About-Us
    17. Čadil, J., Mirošník, K., & Petkovová, L. (2016). Impact of R&D Subsidies on Enterprise Performance in the Czech Republic. Society and Economy, 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2016.38.3.7 Go to original source...
    18. Deloitte. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution Is Here - Are You Ready? Retrieved September 20, 2020, from https://www2.deloitte.com/za/en/pages/consumer-industrial-products/articles/industry-4-0--are-you-ready.html
    19. Dvouletý, O., & Blažková, I. (2019). The Impact of Public Grants on Firm-Level Productivity: Findings from the Czech Food Industry. Sustainability, 11(5), 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020552 Go to original source...
    20. E&Y. (2018). University of the Future. Bringing Education 4.0 to Life. Retrieved November 29, 2019, from https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-university-of-the-future/$File/ey-university-of-the-future.pdf
    21. European Commission. (2017). R&D tax incentives. How to make them most effective? Retrieved September 20, 2020, from https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/report/Tax_incentives_KI-04-17-666-EN-N.pdf
    22. European Commission. (2019). Competition. Retrieved September 20, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/overview/index_en.html
    23. European Commission. (2020a). A New Industrial Strategy for Europe. Retrieved September 18, 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0102&from=EN
    24. European Commission. (2020b). European innovation scoreboard. Retrieved September 18, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/innovation/scoreboards_en
    25. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving Integration in MixedMethods Designs-Principles and Practices. Health Services Research, pp. 2134-2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117 Go to original source...
    26. Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2017). Hitting the nail on the head: Exploring the relationship between public subsidies and open innovation efficiency. Technological Forecasting&Social Change(118), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.022 Go to original source...
    27. Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3928-3937). Piscataway: IEEE. https://doi.org/ HYPERLINK "https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.488" \t "_blank" 10.1109/HICSS.2016.488 Go to original source...
    28. Kang, K.-N., & Park, H. (2011). Influence of government R&D support and inter-firmcollaborationson innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs. Technovation, 32(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.08.004 Go to original source...
    29. Karhunen, H., & Huovari, J. (2015). R&D subsidies and productivity in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 45, 805-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9658-9 Go to original source...
    30. Karo, E., & Kattel, R. (2015, Vol. 18, No. 2, 172-187). Economic development and evolving state capacities in Central and Eastern Europe: Can "smart" specialization" make a difference? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 172-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2015.1009068 Go to original source...
    31. Marešová, P., Soukal, I., Svobodová, L., Hedvičáková, M., & Javanmardi, E. (2018). Consequences of Industry 4.0 in Business and Economics. Economies, 6(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6030046 Go to original source...
    32. Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., & Vaníčková, R. (2015, 17, pp. 549-554). Assessing the implications of EU subsidy policy on renewable energy in Czech Republic. Clean Techn Environ Policy, 17, 549-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0800-1 Go to original source...
    33. Mewes, L., & Broekel, T. (2020). Subsidized to change? The impact of R&D policy on regional technological diversification. The Annals of Regional Science(65), pp. 221-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-020-00981-9 Go to original source...
    34. Minford, L., & Meenagh, D. (2019). Testing a model of UK growth: A role for R&D subsidies. Economic Modelling, 82, 152-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.01.002 Go to original source...
    35. MPO CR. (2018). National Research and Innovation Strategy for Intelligent Specialization of the Czech Republic (National RIS3 Strategy) 2014 - 2020 (update 2018). Retrieved October 30, 2020, from https://www.dataplan.info/img_upload/7bdb1584e3b8a53d337518d988763f8d/narodni_ris3_strategie_aktualizace_2018.pdf
    36. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bustamante, R. M., & Nelson, J. A. (2010). Mixed Research as a Tool for Developing Quantitative Instruments. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), pp. 56-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809355805 Go to original source...
    37. Philbeck, T., & Davis, N. (2019). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Shaping A New Era. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 17-22.
    38. Ravšelj, D., & Aristovnik, A. (2018). The Impact of Private Research and Development Expenditures and Tax Incentives on Sustainable Corporate Growth in Selected OECD Countries. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072304 Go to original source...
    39. Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31, 1053-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00176-7 Go to original source...
    40. Schutt, K. R. (2015). Qualitative Data Analyses. In K. R. Schutt, Investigating the Social World. The Process and Practice of Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
    41. Santos, R. C., & Martinho, J. L. (2019). An Industry 4.0 maturity model proposal. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.cas.cz/10.1108/JMTM-09-2018-0284 Go to original source...
    42. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for Business (Vol. 5th Edition). Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    43. Sreejesh, S., & Mohapatra, S. (2014). Mixed Method Research Design. Springer. Go to original source...
    44. Srholec, M. (2014). Cooperation and Innovative Performance of Firms: Panel Data Evidence from the Czech Republic, Norway and the UK. J Knowl Econ, 5, pp. 133-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-013-0175-2 Go to original source...
    45. Sung, T. (2018). Industry 4.0: A Korea Perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.005 Go to original source...
    46. Tunali, C. B., & Fidrmuc, J. (2015). State Aid Policy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(5), 1143-1162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12247 Go to original source...
    47. Veile, J. W., Kiel, D., Müller, J. M., & Voigt, K.-I. (2019). Lessons learned from Industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2018-0270 Go to original source...
    48. Vrchota, J., Vlčková, M., & Frantíková, Z. (2020). Division of Enterprises and their Management Strategies in Relation to Industry 4.0. Central European Business Review, 9(4), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.243 Go to original source...
    49. World Economic Forum. (2020). Schools of the Future Defining New Models of Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Retrieved January 18, 2021, from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Schools_of_the_Future_Report_2019.pdf

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content