Central European Business Review 2021, 10(5):37-51 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.271

The Effect of Environmental Performance Investments on Financial Performance: Analysis of Croatian Companies

Adriana Galant ORCID...1, Dajana Cvek ORCID...2
1 Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Faculty of economics and tourism “Dr. Mijo Mirković”, Pula, Croatia, adriana.galant@unipu.hr
2 High School of Applied Art and design, Pula, Croatia, dajana.cvek@gmail.com

More attention is being paid to companies’ environmental performance these days. It includes the consideration of how a company’s business operations affect the natural environment in which it operates. In order to improve its environmental performance, various investments are essential. However, one important question is how such environmental performance investments affect the company’s financial performance. The theoretical background indicates that both positive and negative effects on financial performance are possible; however, previous results show that environmental performance has a predominantly positive effect on financial performance. Considering the importance of environmental performance, the aim of this research is to determine if there is a positive relationship between environmental performance investments and financial performance. Investments in new long-term assets are used as a proxy for environmental performance investments since newer long-term assets are considered to be more environmentally acceptable than the older ones, while financial performance is measured with the business result (net profit or loss). The data was analysed by using multivariate regression analysis. The sample included 150 Croatian large-sized companies. The results reveal that there is a positive relationship between environmental performance investments and financial performance. Therefore, such investments are of interest to both the environment and the company since they help to preserve the natural environment and, at the same time, improve the company’s financial performance.
Implications for Central European audience: The effect of environmental performance investments on financial performance has been tested on a sample comparing companies from Central European country, Croatia. Obtained results can be of interests also for audience from other Central European countries with similar characteristics as Croatia due to common historical features (transitional experience).

Keywords: environmental performance investments; financial performance; environmental accounting; Croatia
JEL classification: L25, M41, Q56

Received: October 30, 2020; Revised: February 23, 2021; Accepted: March 1, 2021; Prepublished online: April 30, 2021; Published: December 6, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Galant, A., & Cvek, D. (2021). The Effect of Environmental Performance Investments on Financial Performance: Analysis of Croatian Companies. Central European Business Review, 10(5), 37-51. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.271
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Albertini, E. (2013). Does environmental management improve financial performance? A meta-analytical review. Organization & Environment, 26(4), 431-457. Go to original source...
    2. Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes Ii, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, organisations and society, 29(5-6), 447-471. Go to original source...
    3. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103-126. Go to original source...
    4. Carrión-Flores, C. E., & Innes, R. (2010). Environmental innovation and environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(1), 27-42 Go to original source...
    5. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48 Go to original source...
    6. Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance, Academy of management Journal, 27(1),42-56. Go to original source...
    7. Cormier, D., Gordon, I. M., & Magnan, M. (2004). Corporate environmental disclosure: contrasting management's perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 143-165. Go to original source...
    8. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 15(1), 1-13. Go to original source...
    9. Daoud, J. I. (2017). Multicollinearity and regression analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 949(1) 012009. IOP Publishing. Go to original source...
    10. Delmas, M., & Blass, V. D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: the trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 245-260. Go to original source...
    11. De Roeck, K., & Delobbe, N. (2012), Do environmental CSR initiatives serve organisations' legitimacy in the oil industry? Exploring employees' reactions through organisational identification theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 110 (4), 397-412. Go to original source...
    12. Drejeris, R., & Oželienė, D. (2019). Modeling Environmental Actions of Corporate Sustainable Activity: Evidence from Lithuania. Central European Business Review, 8(5), 69. Go to original source...
    13. Du, X., Jian, W., Zeng, Q., & Du, Y. (2014). Corporate environmental responsibility in polluting industries: Does religion matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 124(3), 485-507. Go to original source...
    14. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100. Go to original source...
    15. Elsayed, K. (2006). Reexamining the expected effect of available resources and firm size on firm environmental orientation: An empirical study of UK firms, Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 297-308. Go to original source...
    16. Endrikat, J., Guenther, E., & Hoppe, H. (2014). Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance, European Management Journal, 32(5), 735-751. Go to original source...
    17. European Communities. (2002). Communication from the commission concerning corporate social responsibility: a business contribution to sustainable development. Commission of the European Communities. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/communication-corporate-social-responsibility-sustainable-development-com2002347-20020702_en.pdf (30.11.2017.)
    18. Galant, A., & Cadez, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: a review of measurement approaches. Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 30(1), 676-693. Go to original source...
    19. Herbohn, K., Walker, J., & Loo, H. Y. M. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: The link between sustainability disclosure and sustainability performance. Abacus, 50(4), 422-459. Go to original source...
    20. Horvat, J., & Mijoč, J. (2019). Istraživački SPaSS [Research SPaSS], Naklada Ljevak, Zagreb
    21. Horváthová, E. (2010). Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis. Ecological economics, 70(1), 52-59. Go to original source...
    22. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145-159. Go to original source...
    23. Khanna, M., Deltas, G., & Harrington, D. R. (2009). Adoption of pollution prevention techniques: the role of management systems and regulatory pressures, Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(1), 85-106. Go to original source...
    24. Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214. Go to original source...
    25. Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? Review of economics and statistics, 83(2), 281-289. Go to original source...
    26. Link, S., & Naveh, E. (2006). Standardisation and discretion: does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits? IEEE transactions on engineering management, 53(4), 508-519. Go to original source...
    27. Melé, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility theories, In Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. & Siegel, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 47-82. Go to original source...
    28. Miles, M. P., & Covin, J. G. (2000). Environmental marketing: A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 299-311. Go to original source...
    29. Nakao, Y., Amano, A., Matsumura, K., Genba, K., & Nakano, M. (2007). Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of Japanese corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(2), 106-118. Go to original source...
    30. Nehrt, C. (1996). Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 535-547. Go to original source...
    31. Perić, J., & Turalija, B. (2018). Corporate social responsibility as an important factor of business success in Croatian companies, Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews, 31(1), 35-45.
    32. Poslovna.hr. (2020). Available at: http://www.poslovna.hr/Login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2f (15.07.2020.)
    33. Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Cho, C. H. (2013). Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 107-129. Go to original source...
    34. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 40(3), 534-559. Go to original source...
    35. Salama, A. (2005). A note on the impact of environmental performance on financial performance. Structural change and economic dynamics, 16(3), 413-421. Go to original source...
    36. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organisational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination, Journal of business ethics, 17(2),195-204. Go to original source...
    37. Starčević, D. P., Mijoč, J., & Zrnić, A. (2017). Is it worth going green in Croatia? Empirical Evidence from SMEs. Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews, 30(1), 141-154
    38. Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 850-862. Go to original source...
    39. Zrnić, A., Starčević, D. P., & Crnković, B. (2020). Recent trends in sustainability reporting: Literature review and implications for future research. Ekonomski Vjesnik/Econviews, 33(1), 271-283

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content