Central European Business Review 2021, 10(1):77-97 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.261

Players as Prosumers – How Customer Engagement in Game Modding May Benefit Computer Game Market

Anna Dewalska–Opitek ORCID...1, Magdalena Hofman–Kohlmeyer ORCID...2
1 University of Economics in Katowice, Faculty of Informatics and Communication, Department of Organisational Relationship Management, Katowice, Poland, anna.dewalska-opitek@ue.katowice.pl
2 University of Economics in Katowice, Faculty of Informatics and Communication, Department of Organisational Relationship Management, Katowice, Poland, magdalena.hofman-kohlmeyer@edu.uekat.pl

Consumers play extra-role behaviours while actively participating in designing and improving goods and services, thus becoming prosumers. Modding, i.e. game modifications which aim at creating a new or improving experience for the players, is an interesting form of prosumption observed in the game industry. The general purpose of the study is to identify to what extent players are willing to perform game modding, as well as who and how may benefit from this extra-role behaviour. Qualitative research was conducted in the form of focus groups with Polish game players. Results of the conducted research allow identifying benefits for four groups of beneficiaries, i.e., players as mod users (game diversification, better customisation, higher quality of games, more realism of the game, fun and excitement to play a modified or a new game, prolonged games’ lifespans), modders as mod creators (creativity, gaining knowledge about how to create a game, social affiliation and pride or career development) game developers (extending games’ lifespans, updating, and renewing game, improving the quality of games, the opportunity to reach a wider audience) and intermediaries like cloud gaming platforms which share the benefits with game developers.
Implications for Central European audience: The study provides evidence that customers’ inclination to prosume may vary and is stimulated by specific drivers in the form of perceived benefits. Thus, the research supports Adam’s equity theory. From the managerial perspective, the current study provides useful, actionable guidance on how to encourage players to engage in real prosumtion in virtual worlds. Game producers need to learn about their customers’ needs outside of normal exchange processes. Players shall be perceived as an inseparable part of the gaming industry, who deliver an extra value to the market by game modding activities.

Keywords: benefits; game modding; prosumption
JEL classification: M31, O35

Received: July 1, 2020; Revised: August 11, 2020; Accepted: August 30, 2020; Prepublished online: December 7, 2020; Published: March 19, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dewalska–Opitek, A., & Hofman–Kohlmeyer, M. (2021). Players as Prosumers – How Customer Engagement in Game Modding May Benefit Computer Game Market. Central European Business Review10(1), 77-97. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.261
Download citation

References

  1. Agrawal, A. K., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Roles and Resource Contributions of Customers in Value Co-creation. International Strategic Management Review, 3, 144-160. Go to original source...
  2. Alhashem, M., Moraes, C., & Szmigin, I. (2013). Collaboration in the marketplace: identifying the critical differences between prosumption and consumer co-creation. In Karaosmanoglu, E., Elmadag Bas, A. (eds.) 42nd Annual Conference, Lost in Translation: Marketing in an Interconnected World. Istanbul, 4-7 June 2013. Istanbul: Istanbul Technical University. pp.149. Available at: https://pure.tue.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/3980803/707265826220161.pdf (accessed 26 May 2020),
  3. Balaji, M.S. (2014). Managing Customer Citizenship Behaviour: a relationship perspective. Journal of Strategic Management, 22(3), 223-239. Go to original source...
  4. Bednarz, J. (2017). Prosumption as a result of changes in consumer behaviour with the example of food industry. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 5(1), 7-24. Go to original source...
  5. Bettencourt, L. A. (1997). Customer Voluntary Performance: As Partners in Service Delivery. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 384-386. Go to original source...
  6. Bloch, P. H., Ridgway, N. M., & Dawson, S.A. (1994). The shopping mall as consumer habitat. Journal of Retailing. 70(1), 23-42. Go to original source...
  7. Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage, New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  8. Chou, T. J., & Ting, C. C. (2003). The role of flow experience in cyber-game addiction. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 6(6), 663-675. Go to original source...
  9. Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623-630. Go to original source...
  10. Dewalska-Opitek, A., & Mitrêga, M. (2019). Appreciate me and I will be your good soldier. The exploration of antecedents to consumer citizenship. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 11(3), 48-59. Go to original source...
  11. Etgar, M. A. (2008). Descriptive Model of the Consumer Co-Production Process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1, 97-108. Go to original source...
  12. Fernandes, T., & Remelhe, P. (2016). How to engage customers in co-creation: customers motivation for collaborative innovations. Journal of Strategic Management, 24(3-4), 311-326. Go to original source...
  13. Fuchs, C. (2013). Digital prosumption labour on social media in the context of the capitalist regime of time. Time & Society, 23(1), 97-123. Go to original source...
  14. Gephardt, R. (2004). What is qualitative research and why is it important? Academy of Management Journal, 7, 454 - 462. Go to original source...
  15. Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 128(4), 381-391. Go to original source...
  16. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. Go to original source...
  17. Griffiths, M. D., Davies, M. N. O., & Chappell, D. (2004). Online Computer Gaming: A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Gamers. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 87-96. Go to original source...
  18. Groth, M. (2005). Customers as Good Soldiers: Examining Citizenship Behaviours in Internet Service Deliveries. Journal of Management, 31(1), 7-27. Go to original source...
  19. Guerro, L. K., Andersen, P. A., & Afifi, W. A. (2011). Close Encounters: Communication in Relationships. SAGE.
  20. Guido, G., & Peluso, A. (2008). Preconditions for diffusion of prosumption among firms: a case study approach. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 6(4), 66-73.
  21. Guo, Y., & Barnes, S. (2011). Purchase behaviour in virtual words: An empirical investigation in Second Life. Information and Management, 48(7), 303-312. Go to original source...
  22. Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393-416. Go to original source...
  23. Hinton, S., & Hjorth, L. (2013). Understanding Social Media, Sage Publications.
  24. Holbrook, M. B. (2006). Consumption experience, customer value, and subjective personal introspection: An illustrative photographic essay. Journal of Business Research, 59, 714-725. Go to original source...
  25. Hong, R., & Chen, V. H. (2014). Becoming an ideal co-creator: Web materiality and intensive labouring practices in game modding. New Media & Society, 16(2), 290-305. Go to original source...
  26. Humphreys, A., & Grayson, K. (2008). The intersecting roles of consumer and producer: a critical perspective on co-production, co-creation and prosumption. Sociology Compass, 2(3), 963-980. Go to original source...
  27. Kim, J. O., Forsythe, S., Gu, Q., & Moon, S. J. (2002). Cross-cultural consumer values, needs and purchase behaviour. Journal of Consumer marketing, 19 (6), 481-502. Go to original source...
  28. Koo, D. M., Lee, S. H., & Chang, H. S. (2007). Experimental motives for playing online game. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 2, 37-48.
  29. Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow theory to Online Consumer Behavior. Information Systems Research. 13(2), 205-223. Go to original source...
  30. Kretzschmar, M., & Stanfill, M. (2019). Mods as Lightning Rods: A Typology of Video Game Mods, Intellectual Property, and Social Benefit/Harm. Social & Legal Studies, 28(4), 517-536. Go to original source...
  31. Kücklich, J. (2005). Precarious Playbour: Modders and the Digital Games. Fibreculture, 5, 1-8.
  32. Loh, C. S., & Byun, J. H. (2009). Modding Neverwinter Nights into serious games. In Digital simulations for improving education: Learning through artificial teaching environments (pp. 408-426). IGI Global. Go to original source...
  33. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA-Sage, p. 27.
  34. Mitrêga, M. (2016). System products' concept and presumption. Economic Studies, University of Economics in Katowice, 262, 5-13.
  35. Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230. Go to original source...
  36. Morse, J. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In Handbook for qualitative research, ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: CA-Sage, p.129.
  37. Nardi, B., & Kallinikos, J. (2010). Technology, agency, and community: The case of modding in World of Warcraft, In Industrial informatics design, use and innovation: Perspectives and services. IGI Global, 174-186. Go to original source...
  38. NG Brian, D., & Wiemer-Hastings, P. (2005). Addiction to the Internet and Online Gaming. Cyber Psychology and Behaviour, 8(2), 110-113. Go to original source...
  39. Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the Co-Creation of Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1, 83-96. Go to original source...
  40. Poovey, M. (1995). Making a Social Body, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 84.
  41. Poretski, L., & Arazy, O. (2017). Placing value on community co-creations: A study of a video game modding community, In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2017, February) (pp. 480-491). ACM. Go to original source...
  42. Poretski, L., Zalmanson, L., & Arazy, O. (2019). The Effects of Co-Creation and Word-of-Mouth on Content Consumption-Findings from the Video Game Industry, the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2019). December 15-18, 2019, Munich, Germany (pp.1-10).
  43. Postigo, H. (2007). Of mods and modders: Chasing down the value of fan-based digital game modifications. Games and Culture, 2(4), 300-313. Go to original source...
  44. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-Creation Experience: The Next Practice in Value Creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14. Go to original source...
  45. Roberts, D., Huges, M., & Kertbo, K. (2013). Exploring consumers' motivations to engage in innovation through co-creation activities. European Journal of Marketing, 48(1/2), 147-169. Go to original source...
  46. Rohm, A. J., & Swaminathan, V. (2004). A Typology of Online Shoppers Based on Shopping Motivations. Journal of Business Research. 57, 748-757. Go to original source...
  47. Rosenbaum, M. S., & Messiah, C. A. (2007). When Customers Receive Support from Other Customers. Journal of Service Research, 9(3), 261. Go to original source...
  48. Ross, S. M., & Kapitan, S. (2018). Balancing self/collective interest: equity theory for prosocial consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 52(3/4), 528-549. Go to original source...
  49. Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179-183. Go to original source...
  50. Scacchi, W. (2011). Modding as a basis for developing game systems, paper presented at 1st Workshop on Games and Software Engineering (GAS'11). at the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, May 2011, Waikiki, Honolulu, (available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228743734_Modding_as_a_basis_for_developing_game_systems) Go to original source...
  51. Sheth, J. N., Newmann, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159-170. Go to original source...
  52. Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of co-design in service designed projects. International Journal of Design, 5(2), 53-60.
  53. Terranova, T. (2013). Free labour. In Sholtz, T. (eds). Digital labour. The internet as playground and factory (pp. 33-57). Routledge, New York, and London.
  54. Törhönen, M., Lobna, H., Max, S., & Juho, H. (2019). Play, Playbour or Labour? The Relationships between Perception of Occupational Activity and Outcomes among Streamers and YouTubers, Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp.2558-2567. Go to original source...
  55. Unger, A. (2012). Modding as part of game culture. In Computer Games and New Media Cultures, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 509-523. Go to original source...
  56. Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Primer, P., & Verhoef, P. (2010). Customer engagement behaviour. Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 13, 253-266. Go to original source...
  57. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17. Go to original source...
  58. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10. Go to original source...
  59. Wallace, R. (2014). Modding: Amateur authorship and how the video game industry is actually getting it right. BYU Law Review, 1(7), 219-255.
  60. Webster, J., Trevino, L., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior. 9, 411-426. Go to original source...
  61. Wing Sung Tung, V., Chen, P. J., & Schuckert, M. (2017). Managing customer citizenship behaviour: the moderating roles of employee responsiveness and organisational reassurance. Tourism Management, 59, 23-35. Go to original source...
  62. Wittmayer, J. M., Fraaije, M., Horstink, L., & Avelino, F. (2019). A multi-dimensional typology of collective RES prosumers across Europe. PROSEU - Prosumers for the Energy Union: Mainstreaming active participation of citizens in the energy transition (Deliverable N°2.2). Available at: researchgate.net (accessed 26 May 2020).
  63. Wood, R., Griffiths, M. D., Chappell, D., & Davies, M. (2004). The Structural Characteristics of Video Games: A Psycho-Structural Analysis. Cyber Psychology and Behavior. 7(1), 1-10. Go to original source...
  64. Wolf, M., & McQuitty, S. (2011). Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS review, 1(3-4), 154-170. Go to original source...
  65. Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., & Troye, S. V. (2008). Trying to Prosume: Toward a Theory of Consumers as Co-Creators of Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1, 109-122. Go to original source...
  66. Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2006). The ascendants and consequences of service and customer citizenship and badness behaviour. Seoul Journal of Business, 12(2), 145-175.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.