Central European Business Review 2020, 9(5):45-62 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.251

Are There Any Economic Impacts of Business R&D Support? The Case of the Czech Republic

Tomáš Ratinger1, Vladislav Čadil2, Sylvester Amoako Agyemang3
1 Technology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic, ratinger@tc.cz
2 Technology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic, cadil@tc.cz
3 Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, amoakoagyemangs@gmail.com

Evaluation of the economic impact of public research and development (R&D) support has become an integral part of the policymaking process. The paper examines the economic effects of the Czech programme TIP supporting R&D in private companies in the recent decade and aspires to contribute to the debate on quantitative methods for assessing outputs additionality of public R&D programmes. The analysis is based on the counter-factual econometric approach, because an appropriate control group could not be found among the unsupported companies, a so-called generalized propensity score matching (GPSM) was used. Two data sources were used: monitoring data of the programme TIP and economic data from the database Bisnode-MagnusWeb. The impact of R&D support on the firms' performance was measured by output indicators: gross value added, profit and productivity. Treatment effects are diverse depending on firm sizes. Generally, the R&D support effects are positive and more substantial in small and medium firms (SMEs) while there are no such effects confirmed for large firms. The support could only impact positively on the output (profit, productivity and gross value added) of small firms only after reaching a certain minimum threshold of the support whereas output diminishes for medium firms after a point of saturation.
Implications for Central European audience: This paper results could be useful for policymakers and R&D funding providers because it provides evidence about the microeconomic impacts of programmes, namely it shows the differentiated effects of public interventions toby the size categories of beneficiaries. The analysis confirms that GPSM approach provides deliver logical outcomes and if the investigation is situated to the right period after the programme is accomplished, it has a potential to bring more insight in the effects than the standard dichotomous model.

Keywords: R&D support; economic impacts; econometric approaches; generalized propensity score matching
JEL classification: C01, C31

Received: May 29, 2020; Revised: July 3, 2020; Accepted: July 8, 2020; Prepublished online: December 8, 2020; Published: December 21, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ratinger, T., Čadil, V., & Amoako Agyemang, S. (2020). Are There Any Economic Impacts of Business R&D Support? The Case of the Czech Republic. Central European Business Review, 9(5), 45-62. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.251
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), 678-690.
    2. Audretsch, D., & Vivarelli, M. (1996). Firms size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy. Small Business Economics, 8(3), 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388651 Go to original source...
    3. Autio, E., & Rannikko, H. (2016). Retaining winners: Can policy boost high-growth entrepreneurship? Research Policy, 45(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.002 Go to original source...
    4. Becker, B. (2015). Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 917-942. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12074 Go to original source...
    5. Bia, M., & Mattei, A. (2012). Assessing the effect of the amount of financial aids to Piedmont firms using the generalized propensity score. Statistical Methods & Applications, 21, 485-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-012-0193-4 Go to original source...
    6. Bondonio, D., Biagi, F., & Stancik, J. (2016). Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Public Funding of Innovation, Investment and R&D [online]. https://doi.org/10.2791/240240 Go to original source...
    7. Bozeman, B., & Deitz, J.S. (2001). Research policy trends in the United States. In P. Laredo &, P. Muster (Eds.). Research and innovation policy in the new global economy, and international comparative analysis (pp. 47-78). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    8. Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firms innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 442-457. Go to original source...
    9. Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Larédo, P. (2016). The impact of direct support to R&D and innovation in firms. In J. Edler, P. Cunningham, A. Gök & P. Shapira (Eds.). Handbook of innovation policy impact (pp. 54-107). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    10. Cunningham, P., den Hertog, P., & Peter, V. (2017). Ex-post evaluation of business R&I grant schemes. Expert panel report prepared for the Horizon 2020 Policy Support Facility, Mutual Learning Exercise, Brussels, European Commission.
    11. Czarnitzki, D., & Delanote, J. (2015). R&D policies for young SMEs: Input and output effects. Small Business Economics, 45(3), 465-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9661-1 Go to original source...
    12. Čadil, V., Kučera, Z., Vondrák, T., & Pecha, O. (2018). Závěrečné hodnocení programu na podporu aplikovaného výzkumu, experimentálního vývoje a inovací TIP. Technologické centrum AV ČR.
    13. Dvouletý, O., Srhoj, S., & Pantea, S. (2020). Public SME grants and firm performance in European Union: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Small Business Economics (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00306-x Go to original source...
    14. Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2012). Do public subsidies affect the performance of new technology-based firms? The importance of evaluation schemes and agency goals. Prometheus, 30(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2012.676836 Go to original source...
    15. Herrera, L., & Sanchez-Gonzalez, G. (2013). Firm size and innovation policy. International Small Business Journal, 31(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611405553 Go to original source...
    16. Hirano, K., & Imbens, G.W. (2004). The propensity score with continuous treatments. In A. Gelman & X-L. Meng (Eds.). Applied Bayesian modeling and causal inference from incomplete-data perspectives (pp. 73-84). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Go to original source...
    17. Hong, J., Wang, L., Xu, Y., & Zhao, D. (2015). Governments grants, private R&D funding and innovation efficiency in transition economy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(9), 1068-1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1060310 Go to original source...
    18. Horák, P., & Květoň, V. (2019). The effect of public R&D subsidies on firm's competitiveness: Regional and sectoral specifics in emerging innovation systems. Applied Geography, 94(May), 119-129. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.03.015 Go to original source...
    19. Huergo, E., & Moreno Martín, L. (2017). Subsidies or loans? Evaluation the impact of R&D support programmes. Research Policy, 46(7), 1198-1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.006 Go to original source...
    20. Karhunen, H., & Huovari, J. (2015). The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 805-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9658-9 Go to original source...
    21. Khandker, S.R., Koowal, G.B., & Samad, A.H. (2010). Handbook on impact evaluation: Quantitative methods and practices. Washington, DC: World Bank. Go to original source...
    22. Nunes, M.P., Serrasqueiro, Z., & Leitão, J. (2012). Is there a linear relationship between R&D intensity and growth? Empirical evidence of non-high-tech vs. high-tech SMEs. Research Policy, 41(1), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.011 Go to original source...
    23. Pavitt, K., Robson, M., & Townsend, J. (1987). The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945-1983. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(3), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098636 Go to original source...
    24. Petrin, T. (2017). A literature review on the impact and effectiveness of government support for R&D and innovation [working paper no. 05/2018, online]. Retrieved from http://www.isigrowth.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/working_paper_2018_05.pdf
    25. Radicic, D., Pugh, G., Hollanders, H. et al. (2016). The impact of innovation support programmes on small and medium enterprises innovation in traditional manufacturing industries: An evaluation for seven European Union regions. Environment and Planning C: Policies and Space, 34(8), 1425-1452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15621759 Go to original source...
    26. Radicic, D., & Pugh, G. (2015). Input and output additionality of R&D programmes in European SMEs. Proceedings of the European Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ECIE 2015), 567-575.
    27. Ratinger, T., Čadil, V., & Agyemang Amaoko, S. (2019). Are there any economic impacts of business R&D support? The case of the Czech Republic. In O. Dvouletý, M. Lukeš, & J. Mísař (Eds.). Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference (pp. 771-782). Prague University of Economics and Business.
    28. Raymond, L., & St-Pierre, J. (2010). R&D as a determinant of innovation in manufacturing SMEs: An attempt at empirical clarification. Technovation, 30(1),48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.005 Go to original source...
    29. Rosenbaum, P.R., & Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 Go to original source...
    30. Rothwell, M., & Dodgson, R. (1994). The handbook of industrial innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    31. Sidorkin, O., & Srholec, M. (2017). Do direct subsidies stimulate new R&D outputs in firms? A comparison of the IMPULS, TIP and ALFA programmes [online]. Retrieved from https://idea.cerge-ei.cz/files/IDEA_Study_8_2017_Direct_subsidies_and_R&D_output_in_firms.pdf
    32. Stam, E., & Wennberg, A.K. (2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small Business Economics, 33, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9183-9 Go to original source...
    33. Špička, J. (2018). How do agricultural biogas investments affect Czech farms? Central European Business Review, 7(1), 34-60. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.205 Go to original source...
    34. Vanino, E., Roper, S., & Becker, B. (2019). Knowledge to money: Assessing the business performance effects of publicly-funded R&D grants. Research Policy, 48(7), 1714-1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.001 Go to original source...
    35. Testa, G., Szkuta, K., & Cunningham, P.N. (2019). Improving access to finance for young innovative enterprises with growth potential: Evidence of the impact of R&D grant schemes on firms' outputs. Research Evaluation, 28(4), 355-369 Go to original source...
    36. What Works Centre for Local Economic Growth (2015). Innovation: Grants, Subsidies and Loans. Evidence Review 9 [online]. Retrieved from https://whatworksgrowth.org/public/files/Policy_Reviews/15-10-20-Innovation-Grants-Loans-Subsidies-Report.pdf
    37. Zemplinerová, A., & Hromádková, E. (2012). Determinants of firm's innovation. Prague Economic Papers, 21(4), 487-503. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.436 Go to original source...
    38. Zúñiga-Vicente, J.Á., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F.J., & Galán, J.I. (2014). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), 36-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00738.x Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content