Central European Business Review 2020, 9(3):24-37 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.236

Servant Leadership and Its Relation to Work Performance

Jana Gašková1
1 University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of Business Administration, Department of Managerial Psychology and Sociology, Prague, Czech Republic, jana.gaskova@vse.cz

Servant leadership has been anchored in academia on the international level during recent years. However, there is a lack of studies within the Central European region. The aim of this study is to review the concept of servant leadership and examine its relation to work performance. The focus is placed on the supervisor’s servant leadership and their relationship with subordinate’s in-role and extra-role work performance. Data were collected via a self-report questionnaire based on validated and adapted scales. The sample included 106 Master students of a standard Management program at the University of Economics, Prague (VŠE) who have a job of 20 hours a week and more. Regression analysis showed a positive and significant relationship between supervisor’s servant leadership and both subordinate’s in-role and extra-role work performance. On the level of individual dimensions of servant leadership, only “empowering” showed to be positively and significantly related to work performance. Results suggest that working business students appreciate when supervisor provides them with responsibility and autonomy. The implications are limited due to the design of the study and the nature of the data. Organisations would benefit from the adoption of servant leadership if they aim to create an environment supportive for both in-role and extra-role work performance.
Implications for Central European audience: Servant leadership is a viable concept used and researched worldwide. Its factorial structure was supported in the Czech context, and it provides a base for future research. Servant leadership might offer a convenient roadmap to accommodate work expectations of millennials and Gen Z from Central European region, e.g. servant leadership behaviour “creating value for the community” aligns with their expectation “business leaders take responsibility for societal needs”.

Keywords: servant leadership; work performance; organisational citizenship behaviour
JEL classification: M10

Received: January 8, 2020; Revised: February 21, 2020; Accepted: February 24, 2020; Prepublished online: July 3, 2020; Published: July 10, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gašková, J. (2020). Servant Leadership and Its Relation to Work Performance. Central European Business Review9(3), 24-37. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.236
Download citation

References

  1. Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (2013). A Critical Review of Leadership Theory. In H. S. et al. Leonard (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Leadership, Change, and Organizational Development (pp. 15-47). John Wiley & Sons. Go to original source...
  2. Ashford, S. J., & DeRue, D. S. (2012). Developing as a leader. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.008 Go to original source...
  3. Banks, G. C., Gooty, J., Ross, R. L., Williams, C. E., & Harrington, N. T. (2018). Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 236-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.005 Go to original source...
  4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. The Free Press.
  5. Bass, B. M. (2000). The Future of Leadership in Learning Organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 7(3), 18-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190000700302 Go to original source...
  6. Bogsnes, B. (2016). Implementing Beyond Budgeting: Unlocking the Performance Potential (2nd Editio). John Wiley & Sons. Go to original source...
  7. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper.
  8. Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.88 Go to original source...
  9. Day, D. V., & Antonakis, J. (2012). Leadership: Past, Present, and Future. In D. V. Day & J. Antonakis (Eds.), The nature of leadership. Sage Publications. Go to original source...
  10. Deloitte. (2019). The Deloitte Global Millennial Survey 2019. Retrieved June 30, 2020, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/deloitte-2019-millennial-survey.pdf
  11. Donia, M. B. L., Raja, U., Panaccio, A., & Wang, Z. (2016). Servant leadership and employee outcomes: the moderating role of subordinates' motives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(5), 722-734. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1149471 Go to original source...
  12. Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2018). Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, July, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004 Go to original source...
  13. Fischerova, M. (2019). Analýza hodnot a kariérových dovedností studentů a absolventů vybraných manažerských programů [Doctoral dissertation, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze]. https://theses.cz/id/60a206/
  14. Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Group Dynamics (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  15. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 Go to original source...
  16. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). The Servant as Leader. In Servant Leadership: a journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness (p. 338). Paulist Press.
  17. Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership Explain Variance Above and Beyond Transformational Leadership? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461 Go to original source...
  18. Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2011). Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: An examination of goal and process clarity and Servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 851-862. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022465 Go to original source...
  19. Humborstad, S. I. W., Nerstad, C. G. L., & Dysvik, A. (2014). Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance. Personnel Review, 43(2), 246-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2012-0008 Go to original source...
  20. Hunter, E. M., Neubert, M. J., Perry, S. J., Witt, L. A., Penney, L. M., & Weinberger, E. (2013). Servant leaders inspire Servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organisation. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(2), 316-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.12.001 Go to original source...
  21. Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The Forgotten Ones? The Validity of Consideration and Initiating Structure in Leadership Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36 Go to original source...
  22. Kolářová, J. (2016). Servant leadership. In E. Jarošová, D. Pauknerová, & H. Lorencová (Eds.), Nové trendy v leadershipu: Koncepce, výzkumy, aplikace (pp. 114-131). Management Press.
  23. Kolářová, J., & Honsová, P. (2017). Adaptace dotazníku SL-28 do češtiny. In A. Gregar & M. Horák (Eds.), Psychologie práce a organizace 2017: Pracovní potenciál a jeho proměny v čase (pp. 291-300). https://doi.org/ISBN 978-80-7454-714-0
  24. Kolářová, J., Honsová, P., & Konvalinka, M. (2016). Translation and adaptation of servant leadership questionnaire into Czech language. In T. Löster & T. Pavelka (Eds.), The 10th International Days of Statistics and Economics (pp. 882-892). Libuše Macáková, MELANDRIUM. https://msed.vse.cz/msed_2016/article/131-Kolarova-Jana-paper.pdf
  25. Kuvaas, B., & Dysvik, A. (2009). Perceived investment in employee development, intrinsic motivation and work performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00103.x Go to original source...
  26. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002 Go to original source...
  27. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006 Go to original source...
  28. Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: theory and practice (Seventh ed). Sage.
  29. Panaccio, A., Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Cao, X. (2015). Toward an Understanding of When and Why Servant Leadership Accounts for Employee Extra-Role Behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(4), 657-675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9388-z Go to original source...
  30. Peterson, S. J., Galvin, B. M., & Lange, D. (2012). CEO Servant Leadership: Exploring Executive Characteristics and Firm Performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), 565-596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01253.x Go to original source...
  31. R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
  32. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/ Go to original source...
  33. Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J. C., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Defining and measuring Servant leadership behaviour in organisations. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 402-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00761.x Go to original source...
  34. van Dierendonck, D., & Nuijten, I. (2011). The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1 Go to original source...
  35. Van Dierendonck, D., Sousa, M., Gunnarsdóttir, S., Bobbio, A., Hakanen, J., Pircher Verdorfer, A., Cihan Duyan, E., & Rodriguez-Carvajal, R. (2017). The Cross-Cultural Invariance of the Servant Leadership Survey: A Comparative Study across Eight Countries. Administrative Sciences, 7(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7020008 Go to original source...
  36. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902 Go to original source...
  37. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on Models of Job Performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00151 Go to original source...
  38. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913 Go to original source...
  39. Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organisational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 517-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018867 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.