Central European Business Review 2019, 8(2):1-14 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.212

Asymmetric Impact of Advertising revenues on Consumer Behavior: A Bivariate Approach

James T. Strong1, Gokce Soydemir2, Panagiotis Petratos3
1 California State University Stanislaus, United States of America, jtstrong@csustan.edu
2 California State University Stanislaus, United States of America, gsoydemir@csustan.edu
3 California State University Stanislaus, United States of America, ppetratos@csustan.edu

There is very little research in the extant literature on the asymmetry that may exist in consumers reactions to changes in the aggregate level of advertising in the marketplace. Aggregate levels of advertising act as a signal to consumers regarding the health of the economy. In this study, we investigate the extent of this asymmetry in terms of how consumer confidence, which is a proxy for future consumer spending, responds to upturns and downturns in advertising revenues. We find that consumers react with higher levels of confidence to upturns in advertising revenues. However, consumers do not react to downturns in advertising revenue with commensurate reductions in consumer confidence. They ignore the signaling effects of a downturn in advertising revenues, displaying asymmetric behavior in response to changes in advertising revenue. The increase in consumer confidence resulting from an increase in advertising revenue is a delayed response effect and comes after two quarters lag. It is statistically significant at conventional levels for the following two quarters as a response to a one-time upturn in advertising revenues. The results provide important information to practitioners and researchers on the asymmetric signaling and ratchet effects of advertising on consumer behavior. The implication for practitioners and policy makers is that aggregate increases in advertising has a delayed positive effect on consumer confidence with positive implications for consumer spending. The implications for researchers is another example of asymmetry in human decision-making and specifically the tendency to embrace positive and ignore negative economic signals. The implication for investors is a better understanding of how macro advertising expenditures function as a leading indicator for consumer confidence, consumer spending, and economic growth.

Keywords: asymmetric impact, advertising, consumer behavior
JEL classification: M37

Received: April 2, 2019; Revised: May 5, 2019; Accepted: May 7, 2019; Prepublished online: June 10, 2019; Published: June 19, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Strong, J.T., Soydemir, G., & Petratos, P. (2019). Asymmetric Impact of Advertising revenues on Consumer Behavior: A Bivariate Approach. Central European Business Review, 8(2), 1-14. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.212
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Agarwal, S., Amromin, G., Chomsisengphet, S., Landvoigt, T., Piskorski, T., Seru, A., & Yao, V. (2015). Mortgage refinancing, consumer spending, and competition: Evidence from the home affordable refinancing program (No. w21512). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21512. Go to original source...
    2. Apergis, N., & Miller, S. M. (2006). Consumption asymmetry and the stock market: empirical evidence. Economics Letters, 93(3), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.06.002. Go to original source...
    3. Baghestani, H., & Kherfi, S. (2015). An error-correction modeling of US consumer spending: are there asymmetries? Journal of Economic Studies, 42(6), 1078-1094. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-04-2014-0065. Go to original source...
    4. Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Thaler, R. H. (2006). Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1069-1090. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.4.1069. Go to original source...
    5. Bernanke, B.S. (1983). Irreversibility, Uncertainty and Cyclical Investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(1), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885568. Go to original source...
    6. Bowman, D., Minehart, D., & Rabin, M. (1999). Loss aversion in a consumption-savings model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38(2), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00004-9. Go to original source...
    7. Carpenter, G. S., Cooper, L. G., Hanssens, D. M., & Midgley, D. F. (1988). Modeling asymmetric competition. Marketing Science, 7(4), 393-412. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.7.4.393. Go to original source...
    8. Carruth, A., & Dickerson, A. (2003). An asymmetric error correction model of UK consumer spending. Applied Economics, 35(6), 619-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684022000035782. Go to original source...
    9. Carruth, A., & Henley, A. (1990). The housing market and consumer spending. Fiscal Studies, 11(3), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1990.tb00138.x. Go to original source...
    10. Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Sichel, D. (2009). Intangible capital and US economic growth. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 661-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00343.x. Go to original source...
    11. Doan, T. A. (1990). Regression analysis of time series. Evanston, IL: Var Econometrics.
    12. Edelstein, P., & Kilian, L. (2009). How sensitive are consumer expenditures to retail energy prices? Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(6), 766-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.06.001 Go to original source...
    13. Granger, C. W., & Lee, T. H. (1989). Investigation of production, sales and inventory relationships using multicointegration and non-symmetric error correction models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 4(S1), S145-S159. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950040508. Go to original source...
    14. Greasley, D., Madsen, J. B., & Oxley, L. (2001). Income uncertainty and consumer spending during the Great Depression. Explorations in Economic History, 38(2), 225-251. https://doi.org/10.1006/exeh.2000.0751 Go to original source...
    15. Hamilton, J. D. (1995). Time series analysis. Economic Theory. II, Princeton University Press, USA, 625-630. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600009440. Go to original source...
    16. Hamilton, J. D. (2003). "What is an Oil Shock?" Journal of Econometrics, 113(2), 363-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00207-5. Go to original source...
    17. Hansson, B. (1988). Risk aversion as a problem of conjoint measurement. Decision, probability, and utility. Cambridge University Press, 136-158. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609220.010. Go to original source...
    18. Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 887. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.887. Go to original source...
    19. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185. Go to original source...
    20. Kõszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2007). Reference-dependent risk attitudes. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1047-1073. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.4.1047. Go to original source...
    21. Kurt, D., Inman, J. J., & Argo, J. J. (2011). The influence of friends on consumer spending: The role of agency-communion orientation and self-monitoring. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(4), 741-754. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.4.741. Go to original source...
    22. Mishkin, F. S. (1995). Symposium on the monetary transmission mechanism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.3. Go to original source...
    23. Morgan, D. P. (1993). Asymmetric effects of monetary policy. Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 78, 21-21.
    24. Mehra, Y. P., & Petersen, J. (2005). Oil prices and consumer spending. FRB Richmond Economic Quarterly, 91(3), 53-72.
    25. Nerlove, M., & Arrow, K. J. (1962). Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.2307/2551549. Go to original source...
    26. Paiella, M. (2009). The stock market, housing and consumer spending: a survey of the evidence on wealth effects. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(5), 947-973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00595.x. Go to original source...
    27. Pitelis, C. N. (1991). The effects of advertising (and) investment on aggregate profits. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 38(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1991.tb00299.x. Go to original source...
    28. Rabin, M. (2013). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I (pp. 241-252). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0013. Go to original source...
    29. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296-320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2. Go to original source...
    30. Rucker, D. D., Dubois, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Generous paupers and stingy princes: Power drives consumer spending on self versus others. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 1015-1029. https://doi.org/10.1086/657162. Go to original source...
    31. Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 352-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.06.001 Go to original source...
    32. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017. Go to original source...
    33. Stevans, L. K. (2004). Aggregate consumption spending, the stock market and asymmetric error correction. Quantitative Finance, 4(2), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680400000023. Go to original source...
    34. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131. Go to original source...
    35. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956. Go to original source...
    36. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574. Go to original source...
    37. Vaish, A., Grossmann, T., & Woodward, A. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: the negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.383. Go to original source...
    38. Watanabe, K., Watanabe, T., & Watanabe, T. (2001). Tax policy and consumer spending: evidence from Japanese fiscal experiments. Journal of International Economics, 53(2), 261-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00077-5. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content