Central European Business Review 2018, 7(4):34-60 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.205

How Do Agricultural Biogas Investments Affect Czech Farms?

Jindřich ©pička
Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, Prague, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3, Czech Republic, jindrich.spicka@vse.cz

The article aims to evaluate the impacts of strategic investments in biogas plants on the economic sustainability and vulnerability of farms with a special focus on investment subsidies. Data spanning 148 farms from the Czech Republic over a thirteen-year period (2004-2016) are used to estimate random effects panel regression models to quantify the short-term and long-term economic sustainability and vulnerability of integrated energy production in the context of mixed type farming. Investments in biogas plants can negatively affect the viability of agricultural companies in the short term because farms which invest in biogas suffer from debt pressures due to inadequate revenues in the construction phase. However, in the long term, the effects of biogas plant operations are positive: economic sustainability is enhanced and vulnerability is reduced mainly due to public support for renewable energy production in the form of feed-in tariffs and green bonuses. Comparing farms that received investment subsidies with nonparticipating farms indicates a high deadweight loss effect which means that programme participants would undertake a similar investment without programme support. However, the investment subsidies improve recipients´ cash flows.

Keywords: agriculture, biogas, Czech Republic, subsidies, sustainability, vulnerability
JEL classification: M21

Received: November 3, 2018; Revised: December 27, 2018; Published: February 1, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©pička, J. (2018). How Do Agricultural Biogas Investments Affect Czech Farms? Central European Business Review, 7(4), 34-60. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.205
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abbas, T., Ali, G., Adil, S. A., Bashir, M. K., & Kamran, M. A. (2017). Economic analysis of biogas adoption technology by rural farmers: The case of Faisalabad district in Pakistan. Renewable Energy, 107, 431-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.060 Go to original source...
    2. Agarwal, V., & Taffler, R. (2008). Comparing the performance of market-based and accounting-based bankruptcy prediction models. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(8), 1541-1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.07.014 Go to original source...
    3. Alaka, H. A., Oyedele, L. O., Owolabi, H. A., Kumar, V., Ajayi, S. O., Akinade, O. O., & Bilal, M. (2018). Systematic review of bankruptcy prediction models: Towards a framework for tool selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 94, 164-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.10.040 Go to original source...
    4. Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed Effects Regression Models. Quantitative applications in the social sciences: 07-160. London: SAGE. Go to original source...
    5. Altman, E. I., & Hotchkiss, E. (2005). Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Go to original source...
    6. Anderson, W. L., & Ross, R. L. (2005). The methodology of profit maximization: An Austrian alternative. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 8(4), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-005-1002-9 Go to original source...
    7. Appel, F., Ostermeyer-Wiethaup, A., & Balmann, A. (2016). Effects of the German Renewable Energy Act on structural change in agriculture - The case of biogas. Utilities Policy, 41, 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.013 Go to original source...
    8. Arellano, M. (2003). Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    9. Bartolini, F., Gava, O., & Brunori, G. (2017). Biogas and EU's 2020 targets: Evidence from a regional case study in Italy. Energy Policy, 109, 510-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.039 Go to original source...
    10. Bonazzi, G., & Iotti, M. (2015). Evaluation of Biogas Plants by the Application of an Internal Rate of Return and Debt Service Coverage Approach. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2015.35.45 Go to original source...
    11. Boritz, J. E., Kennedy, D. B., & Albuquerque, A. D. M. E. (1995). Predicting Corporate Failure Using a Neural Network Approach. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 4(2), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1099-1174.1995.tb00083.x Go to original source...
    12. Börjesson, P., & Tufvesson, L. M. (2011). Agricultural crop-based biofuels - resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2-3), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.001 Go to original source...
    13. Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications: A report to the Balaton Group. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
    14. Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2008). Principles of Corporate Finance. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Go to original source...
    15. Britz, W., & Delzeit, R. (2013). The impact of German biogas production on European and global agricultural markets, land use and the environment. Energy Policy, 62, 1268-1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.123 Go to original source...
    16. Brudermann, T., Mitterhuber, C., & Posch, A. (2015). Agricultural biogas plants - A systematic analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Energy Policy, 76, 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.022 Go to original source...
    17. Camska, D. (2016). Accuracy of models predicting corporate bankruptcy in a selected industry branch. Ekonomický časopis, 64(4), 353-366.
    18. Czech Biogas Association (2018). Data on licenced agricultural plants.
    19. Delzeit, R., & Kellner, U. (2013). The impact of plant size and location on profitability of biogas plants in Germany under consideration of processing digestates. Biomass and Bioenergy, 52, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.029 Go to original source...
    20. Demartini, E., Gaviglio, A., Gelati, M., & Cavicchioli, D. (2016). The Effect of Biogas Production on Farmland Rental Prices: Empirical Evidences from Northern Italy. Energies, 9(11), 965-987. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9110965 Go to original source...
    21. Dougherty, C. (2011). Introduction to Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    22. Dvouletý, O. (2017). Effects of Soft Loans and Credit Guarantees on Performance of Supported Firms: Evidence from the Czech Public Programme START. Sustainability, 9(12), 2293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122293 Go to original source...
    23. Dvouletý, O., Forman, D., Machalický, J., Kinda, L., Havlíček, R., & Hanuą, A. (2018). Would Entrepreneurs Have Started Their Businesses even Without Receiving Public Support? Reflection on the Czech Programme START. Trendy v podnikání, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24132/jbt.2018.8.1.25_32 Go to original source...
    24. Eder, A., & Mahlberg, B. (2018). Size, Subsidies and Technical Efficiency in Renewable Energy Production: The Case of Austrian Biogas Plants. The Energy Journal, 39(1), 185-210. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.1.aede European Commission - Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (2016). Methodological Handbook for Implementing an Ex-Ante Assessment of Agriculture Financial Instruments under the EAFRD. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank. Go to original source...
    25. Forti, R. (2017). Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics: 2017 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office.
    26. Garbs, M., & Geldermann, J. (2018). Analysis of selected economic and environmental impacts of long distance manure transports to biogas plants. Biomass and Bioenergy, 109, 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.009 Go to original source...
    27. Gibson, C. H. (2013). Financial Statement Analysis. Mason, OH: South-Western.
    28. Ginting, N., Zuhri, F., Hasnudi, Mirwandhono, E., Sembiring, I., & Daulay, A. H. (2018). Financial analysis of biogas utilization: Input cattle, pig feces and coffee waste in Karo, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 122, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/122/1/012128 Go to original source...
    29. Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
    30. Guenther-Lübbers, W., Bergmann, H., & Theuvsen, L. (2016). Potential analysis of the biogas production - as measured by effects of added value and employment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 556-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.157 Go to original source...
    31. Gurcik, L. (2002). G-index - the financial situation prognosis method of agricultural enterprises. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská Ekonomika), 48(8), 373-378. Go to original source...
    32. Hanibal, J. (Ed.). (2017). Results of the FADN CZ survey 2016. Prague: Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information.
    33. Huang, Z., Chen, H., Hsu, C.-J., Chen, W.-H., & Wu, S. (2004). Credit rating analysis with support vector machines and neural networks: A market comparative study. Decision Support Systems, 37(4), 543-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00086-1 Go to original source...
    34. Chen, M.-Y. (2011). A hybrid model for business failure prediction-Utilization of particle swarm optimization and support vector machines. Neural Network World, 21(2), 129-152. https://doi.org/10.14311/NNW.2011.21.009 Go to original source...
    35. Cho, S., Hong, H., & Ha, B.-C. (2010). A hybrid approach based on the combination of variable selection using decision trees and case-based reasoning using the Mahalanobis distance: For bankruptcy prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 3482-3488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.10.040 Go to original source...
    36. Iotti, M., & Bonazzi, G. (2016). Assessment of biogas plant firms by application of annual accounts and financial data analysis approach. Energies, 9(9), 713-731. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9090713 Go to original source...
    37. Kizeková, M., Hopkins, A., Kanianska, R., Makovníková, J., Pollák, ©., & Pálka, B. (2018). Changes in the area of permanent grassland and its implications for the provision of bioenergy: Slovakia as a case study. Grass and Forage Science, 73(1), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12333 Go to original source...
    38. Klepac, V., & Hampel, D. (2017). Predicting financial distress of agriculture companies in EU. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská Ekonomika), 63(8), 347-355. https://doi.org/10.17221/374/2015-AGRICECON Go to original source...
    39. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kauffman Publishers. Go to original source...
    40. Kopta, D. (2009). Possibilities of financial health indicators used for prediction of future development of agricultural enterprises. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská Ekonomika), 55(3), 111-125. Go to original source...
    41. Krause, J., & Machek, O. (2018). A comparative analysis of organic and conventional farmers in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská Ekonomika), 64(1), 1-8. Go to original source...
    42. Latruffe, L., Diazabakana, A., Bockstaller, C., Desjeux, Y., Finn, J., Kelly, E.... Uthes, S. (2016). Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: A review of indicators. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118(3), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1624 Go to original source...
    43. Manasova, Z. (2008). Insolvency of the Czech companies its timely prediction. Doctoral dissertation. Prague: University of Economics.
    44. Mckee, T. E. (2000). Developing a bankruptcy prediction model via rough sets theory. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management, 9(3), 159-173. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1174(200009)9:33.0.CO;2-C Go to original source...
    45. Megginson, W. L. (1997). Corporate Finance Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    46. Meyer, A.K.P., Ehimen, E. A., & Holm-Nielsen, J. B. (2018). Future European biogas: Animal manure, straw and grass potentials for a sustainable European biogas production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 111, 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.05.013 Go to original source...
    47. Min, S.-H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2006). Hybrid genetic algorithms and support vector machines for bankruptcy prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(3), 652-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.070 Ministry of Agriculture. (2008). The Rural Development Programme of the Czech Republic 2007 - 2013. Prague. Retrieved November 30, 2018 from http://eagri.cz/public/web/file/10574/RDP_November_2008.pdf. Ministry of Agriculture (2018). Data about investment subsidies of biogas plants. Prague: Ministry of Agriculture, Czech Republic. Go to original source...
    48. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
    49. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53(3), 433-443.
    50. Morris, R. (1997). Early warning indicators of corporate failure: A critical review of previous research and further empirical evidence / Richard Morris. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    51. Neumaierova, I., & Neumaier, I. (2005). Index IN05. In P. Cervinek (Ed.), European Financial Systems (pp. 143-148). Brno: Masaryk University.
    52. O'Donoghue, C., Devisme, S., Ryan, M., Conneely, R., Gillespie, P., & Vrolijk, H. (2016). Farm economic sustainability in the European Union: A pilot study. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1631 Go to original source...
    53. Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490395 Go to original source...
    54. Ostermeyer, A., & Schonau, F. (2012). Effects of biogas production on inter- and in-farm competition (No. 708-2016-48449). Prague. Retrieved November 11, 2018 from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/135772/files/Ostermeyer.pdf.
    55. Ratinger, T., Medonos, T., & Hruska, M. (2013). An assessment of the differentiated effects of the investment support to agricultural modernisation: the case of the Czech Republic. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5(4), 153-164.
    56. Sgroi, F., Donia, E., & Alesi, D. R. (2018). Renewable energies, business models and local growth. Land Use Policy, 72, 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.028 Go to original source...
    57. Shin, K.-S., & Lee, Y.-J. (2002). A genetic algorithm application in bankruptcy prediction modeling. Expert Systems with Applications, 23(3), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00051-9 Go to original source...
    58. Slaboch, J., & Hálova, P. (2016). The Influence of investment costs on biogas station development and their impact on greenhouse gas emissions from Czech agriculture. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 8(4), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2016.080413 Go to original source...
    59. ©pička, J. (2015). Insolvency in agriculture - impact of current subsidies on financial position. In M. Čulík (Ed.): Financial Management of Firms and Financial Institutions, Financial Management of Firms and Financial Institutions: 10th International Scientific Conference (pp. 1279-1284). Ostrava: VSB Ostrava.
    60. ©pička, J., & Krause, J. (2013). Selected socioeconomic impacts of public support for agricultural biogas plants: The case of the Czech Republic. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 19(5), 929-938.
    61. ©pička, J., Naglova, Z., & Gurtler, M. (2017). Effects of the investment support in the Czech meat processing industry. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 63(8), 356-369. https://doi.org/10.17221/367/2015-AGRICECON Go to original source...
    62. Swamy, P. A. V. B., & Arora, S. S. (1972). The exact finite sample properties of the estimators of coefficients in the error components regression models. Econometrica, 40(2), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909405 Go to original source...
    63. Vochozka, M., Marouąková, A., & ©uleř, P. (2018). Economic, environmental and moral acceptance of renewable energy: A Case Study-The Agricultural Biogas Plant at Pěčín. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(1), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9881-7 Go to original source...
    64. Walla, C., & Schneeberger, W. (2008). The optimal size for biogas plants. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32(6), 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.009 Go to original source...
    65. Watson, I. D. (1997). Applying case-based reasoning: Techniques for enterprise systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
    66. Wilcox, J. W. (1973). A prediction of business failure using accounting data. Journal of Accounting Research, 11, 163-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490035 Go to original source...
    67. Wilson, R. L., & Sharda, R. (1994). Bankruptcy prediction using neural networks. Decision Support Systems, 11(5), 545-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)90024-8 Go to original source...
    68. Yasar, A., Nazir, S., Tabinda, A. B., Nazar, M., Rasheed, R., & Afzaal, M. (2017). Socio-economic, health and agriculture benefits of rural household biogas plants in energy scarce developing countries: A case study from Pakistan. Renewable Energy, 108(August), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.044 Go to original source...
    69. Yeh, C.-C., Chi, D.-J., & Lin, Y.-R. (2014). Going-concern prediction using hybrid random forests and rough set approach. Information Sciences, 254, 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.011 Go to original source...
    70. Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 59-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490859 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content