Central European Business Review 2018, 7(3):1-25 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.200

Influence of Luxury Companies’ Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Consumer Purchase Intention: Development of a Theoretical Framework

Květa Olšanová1, Gina Gook2, Marija Zlatić3
1 Department of International Business, Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics, Prague, Nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic, kveta.olsanova@vse.cz
2 Department of Management, Metropolitan State University of Denver, PO Box 173362, Denver, CO 80217 USA, gcook13@msudenver.edu
3 Department of International Business, Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics, Prague, Nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic, marija.zlatic@vse.cz

The topics of sustainability and strategic corporate social responsibility are currently being discussed by different stakeholders on academic, industry and various activist levels; however, the level to which they are incorporated into organizations’ strategy varies significantly by industry. The needs of the customers as well as the requirements from state governance may challenge the currently relatively “CSR silent” luxury industry to become more active in its contribution to social responsibility.  This paper investigates the topic of corporate social responsibility within the context of the luxury industry, the extent to which customers are aware of CSR and the significance of the role it plays in their customer journey.  The authors provide a literature review focused on exploring CSR variables that impact customer purchase intention in general and specifically in the luxury segment, from which they identify key CSR measures and conduct qualitative research to develop a theoretical framework. It suggests that purchase intention in the luxury segment is dependent on the luxury values, individual sustainable dimension and awareness of the brand’s CSR, the last two relationships being potentially moderated by certain conditions such as demographics and general positive attitudes towards CSR and sustainability. The model’s output is in the formulation of several propositions for further research. Overall, the qualitative interviews indicate that while knowledge of the specific CSR activities of particular luxury brands was low, luxury buyers in this research tend to express quite positive attitudes towards CSR in general, were rational, and very open to considering CSR as an added value to their luxury shopping.

Keywords: CSR, luxury industry, purchase intention, purchase intention for luxury brands
JEL classification: M31

Received: July 30, 2018; Revised: October 2, 2018; Prepublished online: November 19, 2018; Published: November 20, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Olšanová, K., Gook, G., & Zlatić, M. (2018). Influence of Luxury Companies’ Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Consumer Purchase Intention: Development of a Theoretical Framework. Central European Business Review, 7(3), 1-25. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.200
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alvarado-Herrera, A., Bigne, E., & Aldas-Manzano, J. (2017). A Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Following the Sustainable Development Paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 243-262. Go to original source...
    2. Bendell, J., & Kleanthous, A. (2007). Deeper luxury: quality and style when the world matters. Retrieved November 9, 2017, from http://aidagency.typepad.com/good_stuff/files/DeeperluxuryReport.pdf.
    3. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing beter at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9-22. Go to original source...
    4. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113. Go to original source...
    5. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39-48. Go to original source...
    6. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295. Go to original source...
    7. Chandler, D. (2017). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Sustainable Value Creation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    8. Cheah, I., Phau, I., Chong, C., & Shimul, A. S. (2015). Antecedents and outcomes of brand prominence on willingness to buy luxury brands. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 19(4), 402-415. Go to original source...
    9. CSR Europe (2017). Goals (SDGs): The Value for Europe (A Whitepaper by Frost & Sullivan and GlobeScan on behalf of CSR Europe). Retrieved August 2018, from CSR Europe: https://www.csreurope.org/sites/default/files/FS_WP_Sustainable%20Development%20Goals_05112017_RD_0.pdf.
    10. Davies, I. A., Lee, Z., & Ahonkhai, I. (2012). Do Consumers Care About Ethical-Luxury? Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 37-51. Go to original source...
    11. Deloitte (2017). Global Powers of Luxury Goods 2017. Retrieved November 4, 2017, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/consumer-industrial-products/gx-cip-global-powers-luxury-2017.pdf.
    12. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier. Management Science, 57(9), 1528-1545. Go to original source...
    13. Dubois, B., & Laurent, G. (1993). Is There a Euro Consumer For Luxury Goods? European Advances in Consumer Research, 1, 58-69.
    14. Dubois, B., & Paternault, C. (1995). Observations: understanding the world of international luxury brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(4), 69-76.
    15. Fatma, M., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Consumer perspective on CSR literature review and future research agenda. Management Research Review, 38(2), 195-216. Go to original source...
    16. Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Dreze, X. (2010). Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 15-30. Go to original source...
    17. Haski-Leventhal, D. (2018). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
    18. Heine, K. (2012). The concept of luxury brands. Retrieved November 14, 2017, from http://www.conceptofluxurybrands.com/content/20121107_Heine_The-Concept-of-Luxury-Brands.pdf.
    19. Hennings, N., Wiedmann, K.-P., Klarmann, C., & Behrens, S. (2015). The complexity of value in the luxury industry. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40(10/11), 922-939. Go to original source...
    20. Ho, H. C., Awan, M. A., & Khan, H. U. (2016). Luxury brands and corporate social responsibility: A perspective on consumers' preferences. Journnal of International Management Studies, 16(1), 77-81. Go to original source...
    21. Hung, K.-p., Chen, A. H., Peng, N., Tiwsakul, R. A., & Chou, C.-l. (2011). Antecedents of Luxury Brand Purchase Intention. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 20(6), 457-468. Go to original source...
    22. Interbrands (2017). Best Global Brands. Retrieved December 18, 2017, from www.interbrands.com: http://interbrand.com/best-brands/best-global-brands/2016/ranking/#?listFormat=sq&filter=Europe%20%26%20Africa%2CLuxury.
    23. Kale, G. Ö., & Öztürk, G. (2016). The importance of sustainability in luxury brand management. Intermedia International e-Journal, 3(4), 106-126. Go to original source...
    24. Kapferer, J. N., & Bastien, V. (2012). The Luxury Strategy: Break the Rules of Marketing to Build Luxury Brands. London: Kogan Page.
    25. Kapferer, J., & Michaut-Denizeaut, A. (2014). Is Luxury Compatible with Sustainability? Luxury Consumers' Viewpoint. Journal of Brand Management, 21(1), 1-22. Go to original source...
    26. Lin, C. P., Chen, S. C., Chiu, C. K., & Lee, W. Y. (2011). Understanding purchase intention during product-harm crises: moderating effects of perceived corporate ability and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(3), 455-471. Go to original source...
    27. Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Organizational stages and cultural phases: A critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 20-38. Go to original source...
    28. Mohr, L. A., & Webb, J. D. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. The Journal of Connsumer Affairs, 39(1), 121-147. Go to original source...
    29. Moon, H.-C., Parc, J., Yim, S. H., & Park, N. (2011). An Extension of Porter and Kramer's Creating Shred Value (CSV): Reorienting Strstegies and Seeking International Cooperation. Journal of International and Area Studies, 18(2), 49-64.
    30. Morgan Stanley (2017). Millennials Drive Growth in Sustainable Investing. Morgan Stanley. Retrieved November 18, 2017, from: https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/sustainable-socially-responsible-investing-millennials-drive-growth.
    31. Positive Luxury (2016). Positive Luxury's 2016 Predictions for the Luxury Industry: Sustainability & Innovation. Retrieved November 18, 2017, from Positive Luxury: http://positiveluxury.msgfocus.com/files/amf_pets_pyjamas/project_173/2016_Predictions_for_the_Luxury_Industry_in_Sustainability_and_Innovation_-_The_Executive_Summary.pdf.
    32. Positive Luxury (2017). The Hong Kong fur trade, and how Gucci's ban could affect it. Retrieved November 15, 2017, from https://blog.positiveluxury.com/2017/11/14/news-supply-chain-becoming-part-luxury-designers-branding-strategies/#newssection2.
    33. Robertson, J. (2018). Can luxury be socially responsible? How luxury brands frame their corporate social responsibility online. Annals in Social Responsibility, 4(1), 10-12. Go to original source...
    34. Schutt, K. R. (2015). Qualitative Data Analyses. In K. R. Schutt (Ed.), Investigating the Social World. The Process and Practice of Research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
    35. Sharma, V., Jeannne, P., Mohanta, S., & Liza, E. A. (2018). Influence of the dimensions of CSR activities on consumer purchase intention. Innovative Marketing, 14(1), 23-32. Go to original source...
    36. Sreejesh, S., & Mohapatra, S. (2014). Mixed Method Research Design. New York: Springer. Go to original source...
    37. Sustainable Brands (2017). Kering to Transform Luxury Industry with Next-Gen Sustainability Strategy. Retrieved August 2018, from https://www.sustainablebrands.com/news_and_views/business_models/libby_maccarthy/kering_transform_luxury_industry_next_gen_sustainable.
    38. Trendwatching (2018). Annual Trend Report. Retrieved November 9, 2017, from www.trendwatching.com.
    39. United Nations (1987). Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development. Retrieved November 2, 2017, from Our: http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf.
    40. United Nations (2015). Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Retrieved August 2018, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.
    41. Wong, J., & Dhanesh, G. (2017). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) for ethical corporate identity management. Framing CSR as a tool for managing the CSR-luxury pradox online. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 22(4), 420-439. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content