Central European Business Review 2018, 7(2):61-74 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.199

The Influence of Knowledge Sources on Firm-Level Innovation: The Case of Slovak and Hungarian Manufacturing Firms

Samuel Amponsah Odei1, Jan Stejskal2
1 University of Pardubice, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Pardubice, Czech Republic, samuelamponsah.odei@upce.cz
2 University of Pardubice, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Pardubice, Czech Republic, jan.stejskal@upce.cz

This paper seeks to examine the various sources of knowledge and innovation that Slovak and Hungarian manufacturing firms rely on to improve their innovative performance. To carry out our empirical analysis we used the multiple regression technique and data from the Community Innovation Survey conducted between 2010 and 2012. Our empirical analysis demonstrated divergent results for both countries. Slovak firms derived their innovation from in-house activities and other sources such as scientific journals and conferences while Hungarian firms relied on market sources such as cooperation with clients or customers from the private sector for their innovation as well as from scientific journals. However, there was a convergence in the results, manufacturing firms in both countries didn’t collaborate with research institutions such as universities and other public and private research organization for their innovation. This study, therefore, proposes firms to foster closer collaboration with these research institutions since they are the birthplaces of innovation that can increase their competitiveness and innovation performance.

Keywords: Innovation; knowledge; knowledge sources; innovation performance; Slovakia; Hungary
JEL classification: L60, O30, O33

Received: May 2, 2018; Revised: June 30, 2018; Published: July 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Odei, S.A., & Stejskal, J. (2018). The Influence of Knowledge Sources on Firm-Level Innovation: The Case of Slovak and Hungarian Manufacturing Firms. Central European Business Review, 7(2), 61-74. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.199
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Arocena, R., Göransson, B., & Sutz, J. (2015). Knowledge policies and universities in developing countries: Inclusive development and the "developmental university". Technology in Society, 41, 10-20. Go to original source...
    2. Belderbos, R., Gilsing, V. A., & Suzuki, S. (2016). Direct and mediated ties to universities: "Scientific" absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Organization, 14(1), 32-52. Go to original source...
    3. Beneito, P. (2006). The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models. Research Policy, 35(4), 502-517. Go to original source...
    4. Berchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117-127. Go to original source...
    5. Buenstorf, G. (2009). Is commercialization good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society. Research Policy, 38(2), 281-292. Go to original source...
    6. Bušíková, A. (2011). University-industry collaboration in Slovakia in comparison with other EU countries and the US: what can we learn. In Proceedings from int. conference Management Challenges in the 21st Century. Trenčín: Vysoká škola managementu v Trenčíně, pp. 249-255.
    7. Carayannis, E. G., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2015). Business model innovation as lever of organizational sustainability. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 85-104. Go to original source...
    8. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68-82 Go to original source...
    9. Chatterjee, S., & Hadi, A. S. (2015). Regression analysis by example. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    10. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23. Go to original source...
    11. Cui, T., Ye, H. J., Teo, H. H., & Li, J. (2015). Information technology and open innovation: A strategic alignment perspective. Information & Management, 52(3), 348-358. Go to original source...
    12. Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709. Go to original source...
    13. Damijan, J. P., Knell, M., Majcen, B., & Rojec, M. (2003). The role of FDI, R&D accumulation and trade in transferring technology to transition countries: evidence from firm panel data for eight transition countries. Economic Systems, 27(2), 189-204. Go to original source...
    14. Dudin, M. N., Voykova, N. A., Galkina, M. V., & Vernikov, V. A. (2016). Development of Hungary's Manufacturing Industry in the Conditions of European Integration. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(5S), 48-52.
    15. Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey. Research Policy, 38(7), 1125-1135. Go to original source...
    16. Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2017). Organizing for knowledge generation: Internal knowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 395-414. Go to original source...
    17. Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2014). Combining knowledge from different sources, channels and geographical scales. European Planning Studies, 22(11), 2305-2325. Go to original source...
    18. Hashmi, A. R. (2013). Competition and innovation: The inverted-U relationship revisited. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1653-1668. Go to original source...
    19. Ingram, A. E., Lewis, M. W., Barton, S., & Gartner, W. B. (2016). Paradoxes and innovation in family firms: The role of paradoxical thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 161-176. Go to original source...
    20. Jabagi, N., Jiang, J., MacLean, D., Chalmeau, S., & Yang, J. (2016). Communicating to Practitioners through IS Research: a Descriptive Review. In Americas' Conference on Information System (AMCIS) 2016 Proceedings. San Diego: Association for Information Systems, pp. 1-10.
    21. Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. In Lundvall, B. A. (Ed.), The learning economy and the economics of hope (pp. 155-182). London: Anthem Press.
    22. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research policy, 33(8), 1201-1215. Go to original source...
    23. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867-878. Go to original source...
    24. Lee, A. S. (2000). The Social and Political Context of Doing Relevant Research, MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 355-355. Go to original source...
    25. Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010). Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 224-236. Go to original source...
    26. Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315-332. Go to original source...
    27. McAdam, R., O'Hare, T., & Moffett, S. (2008). Collaborative knowledge sharing in composite new product development: an aerospace study. Technovation, 28(5), 245-256. Go to original source...
    28. Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481-1499. Go to original source...
    29. Odei, S. A. (2017). Commercialization of Academic Research: Assessing the Enabling Conditions for German Universities. In European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Academic Conferences International Limited, pp. 750-757.
    30. Odei, S. A., Stejskal, J. (2018). Factors Influencing Spin-off Activities at Universities: Empirical Evidence from the United Kingdom., 21st International Colloquium on Regional Sciences. Conference proceedings. Brno: Masaryk University, pp. 117- 124. Go to original source...
    31. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280. Go to original source...
    32. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2008). Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry. Research Policy, 37(10), 1884-1891. Go to original source...
    33. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D'Este, P., ... & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. Go to original source...
    34. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437-448 Go to original source...
    35. Prokop, V., & Stejskal, J. (2018). Determinants of Innovation Activities: Public Financing and Cooperation: Case Study of Czech Republic and Hungary. In Modeling Innovation Sustainability and Technologies (pp. 77-91). Cham: Springer. Go to original source...
    36. Santamaría, L., Nieto, M. J., & Barge-Gil, A. (2009). Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low-and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 507-517. Go to original source...
    37. Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Business model innovation: Towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1340001. Go to original source...
    38. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142. Go to original source...
    39. Sorenson, O., & Fleming, L. (2004). Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Research policy, 33(10), 1615-1634. Go to original source...
    40. Stejskal, J., & Hajek, P. (2012). Competitive advantage analysis: a novel method for industrial clusters identification. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(2), 344-365. Go to original source...
    41. Straub, D. W., and Ang, S. (2008). Readability and the Relevance Versus Rigor Debate. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 3-13. Go to original source...
    42. Straub, D. W., and Ang, S. (2011). Rigor and relevance in IS research: Redefining the debate and a call for future research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 3-11. Go to original source...
    43. Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research policy, 31(6), 947-967. Go to original source...
    44. Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Santoro, G., & Papa, A. (2017). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 374-388. Go to original source...
    45. West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831. Go to original source...
    46. Yeniyurt, S., Henke, J. W., & Yalcinkaya, G. (2014). A longitudinal analysis of supplier involvement in buyers' new product development: working relations, inter-dependence, co-innovation, and performance outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(3), 291-308. Go to original source...
    47. Zhang, F., & Gallagher, K. S. (2016). Innovation and technology transfer through global value chains: Evidence from China's PV industry. Energy Policy, 94, 191-203. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content