Central European Business Review 2016, 5(4):34-46 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.165

Comparative Advertising in the Czech Republic: An Empirical Study

Petr Král1, Martin Machek2, Tomáš Karel3
1 Ing. Petr Král, Ph.D., Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics, Prague, petr.kral@vse.cz
2 Ing. Martin Machek, Ph.D., Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, Prague, martin.machek@vse.cz
3 Ing. Tomáš Karel, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Department of Statistics and Probability, tomas.karel@vse.cz

Comparative advertising had been traditionally banned in most EU countries and was allowed by the European law just relatively recently. That is why in the EU this form of advertising is relatively new, as opposed to the situation in the US, where comparative advertising has been widely used and well accepted by consumers for decades. The literature has been silent on the topic of the effectiveness of comparative advertising in the Czech Republic, as well as in other Central and Eastern European countries. The goal of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of comparative advertising campaigns in the Czech Republic. Using an online survey with 160 Czech respondents, we found that the attitude towards comparative advertising is rather positive in the Czech Republic. We also identified that the gender of the recipient influences the general perception of comparative advertising. On the other hand, the age of the recipient does not seem to be a moderator of the attitude towards comparative advertising, in general. The results also do not signal any impact of the gender and the age of the recipient on the change of the perception of any of the brands involved in the campaign. Managerial implications target mainly marketing and advertising managers responsible for Central European markets.

Keywords: Marketing; comparative advertising; Czech Republic; Central Europe; Škoda; Hyundai
JEL classification: M31, M37

Received: July 9, 2016; Revised: November 13, 2016; Published: December 31, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Král, P., Machek, M., & Karel, T. (2016). Comparative Advertising in the Czech Republic: An Empirical Study. Central European Business Review5(4), 34-46. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.165
Download citation

References

  1. Barone, M. J., Palan, K. M., & Miniard, P. W. (2004). Brand usage and gender as moderators of the potential deception associated with partial comparative advertising. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 19-28. Go to original source...
  2. Beard, F. K. (2013). Practitioner Views of Comparative Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 53(3), 313-323. Go to original source...
  3. Choi, Y. K., & Miracle, G. E. (2004). The effectiveness of comparative advertising in Korea and the United States: A cross-cultural and individual-level analysis. Journal of Advertising, 33(4), 75-87. Go to original source...
  4. Baltar, F., & Brunet, I. (2012). Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research, 22(1), 57-74. Go to original source...
  5. Herbig, P. A., & Day, R. L. (1992). Customer acceptance: the key to successful introductions of innovations. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 10(1), 4-15. Go to original source...
  6. Levy, R. (1987). Big resurgence in comparative ads. Dun's Business Month, 129(2), 56-8.
  7. Manzur, E., Uribe, R., Hidalgo, P., Olavarrieta, S., & Farías, P. (2012). Comparative advertising effectiveness in Latin America: evidence from Chile. International Marketing Review, 29(3), 277-298. Go to original source...
  8. Murpmy, J. N., & Amundsen, M. S. (1981). The Communications - Effectiveness of Comparative Advertising for a New Brand on Users of the Dominant Brand. Journal of Advertising, 10(1), 14-48. Go to original source...
  9. Neese, W. T., & Haynie, J. J. (2015). The Influence of Comparative Advertising on Consumer Ethnocentrism in the American Automobile Market. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(3), 321-337. Go to original source...
  10. Nye, C. W., Roth, M. S., & Shimp, T. A. (2008). Comparative advertising in markets where brands and comparative advertising are novel. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 851-863. Go to original source...
  11. Ogilvy, D. (1983). Ogilvy on advertising. New York: Crown.
  12. Pfau, M. (1994). Impact of product involvement, message format, and receiver sex on the efficacy of comparative advertising messages. Communication Quarterly, 42(3), 244-258. Go to original source...
  13. Polyorat, K., & Alden, D. L. (2005). Self-construal and need-for-cognition effects on brand attitudes and purchase intentions in response to comparative advertising in Thailand and the United States. Journal of advertising, 34(1), 37-48. Go to original source...
  14. Shao, A. T., Bao, Y., & Gray, E. (2004). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Advertising Appeals in High Context and Low Context Cultures. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2). Go to original source...
  15. Schwaiger, M., Rennhak, C., Taylor, C. R., & Cannon, H. M. (2007). Can comparative advertising be effective in Germany? A tale of two campaigns. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(1), 2-13. Go to original source...
  16. Shimp, T. A., & Dyer, D. C. (1978). The effects of comparative advertising mediated by market position of sponsoring brand. Journal of Advertising, 7(3), 13-19. Go to original source...
  17. Strategie (2013). Automobilky vyhlásily korejsko-českou válku. Strategie [online]. Retrieved November 5, 2016 from http://strategie.e15.cz/clanek/zurnal/tema-mesice-automobilky-vyhlasily-korejsko-ceskou-valku-1030303.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.