Central European Business Review 2016, 5(4):11-22 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.163

Construction and Application of Radical Candor: Efficiency of Criticism at Work

Marek Vich1, Marina Y. Kim2
1 Ing. Marek Vich, PhD candidate, Organizational Psychologist and Researcher, Department of Managerial Psychology and Sociology, University of Economics, Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic, marek.vich@mindfulnessclub.cz
2 Ing. Marina Y. Kim, PhD candidate, Senior Business Analyst, Department of Managerial Psychology and Sociology, University of Economics, Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic, marina.y.kimm@gmail.com

Negative feedback has been repeatedly identified as beneficial for organizational learning, adaptability, and performance. Despite having these advantages, most organizations still do not use negative feedback to its full potential, as they fail to spread it correctly among their members. The application of negative feedback, therefore, faces several issues like misuse or process avoidance that are mostly driven by psychological factors. The purpose of this paper is to discuss potential benefits of a newly emerged organizational approach called radical candor for contemporary state of the art in feedback-related behavior and to propose how it might be successfully applied in organizational settings. We define radical candor as a proactive and compassionate engagement in an unpleasant and direct feedback process. Radical candor may help reduce the influence of psychological factors like extreme levels of attachment, harsh emotions or low self-esteem in order to make organizational members more engaged and satisfied with the negative feedback process. Organizations willing to apply radical candor might consider either official implementation from top to bottom (through managers and leadership) or unofficial intervention through the agents (employees of all levels) depending on company characteristics.

Keywords: radical candor; feedback-seeking behavior; feedback-giving behavior; compassion; self-compassion
JEL classification: M14, M53, O35

Received: September 28, 2016; Revised: December 11, 2016; Published: December 31, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vich, M., & Kim, M.Y. (2016). Construction and Application of Radical Candor: Efficiency of Criticism at Work. Central European Business Review, 5(4), 11-22. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.163
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Allen, T. D., Shockley, K. M., & Poteat, L. (2010). Protégé anxiety attachment and feedback in mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 73-80. Go to original source...
    2. Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, May-June (69), 99-109.
    3. Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 465-487. Go to original source...
    4. Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & VandeWalle, D. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29(6), 773-799. Go to original source...
    5. Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32(3), 370-398. Go to original source...
    6. Ashford, S. J., Stobbeleir, K. D., & Nujella, M. (2016). To seek or not to seek: Is that the only question? Recent developments in feedback-seeking literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 213-239. Go to original source...
    7. Baron, R. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 199-207. Go to original source...
    8. Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118. Go to original source...
    9. Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science, 4(1), 1-44. Go to original source...
    10. Benedict, M. E., & Levine, E. L. (1988). Delay and distortion: Tacit influences on performance appraisal effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 507-514. Go to original source...
    11. Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (1999). Measuring impression management in organizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 87-206. Go to original source...
    12. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment: Attachment and Loss, volume 1, 2nd edition. New York: Basic Books.
    13. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. (1998). Attachment theory and close relationships, chapter Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. New York: Guilford Press.
    14. Brown, J. D. (2010). High self-esteem buffers negative feedback: Once more with feeling. Cognition and Emotion, 24(8), 1389-1404. Go to original source...
    15. Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26-48. Go to original source...
    16. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644-663. Go to original source...
    17. Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: the rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading: Addison-Wesley Pub. Go to original source...
    18. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. Go to original source...
    19. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507. Go to original source...
    20. Feintzeig, R. (2015). "Nice" Is a Four-Letter Word at Companies Practicing Radical Candor; More workplaces endorse the practice of blunt, direct criticism aka front stabbing to improve performance and communication. Wall Street Journal (Online). Retrieved November 28, 2016 from: http://www.wsj.com/articles/nice-is-a-four-letter-word-at-companies-practicing-radical-candor-1451498192.
    21. Galán, J. I., Monje, J. C., & Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á. (2009). Implementing change in smaller firms. Research Technology Management, 52(1), 59-67. Go to original source...
    22. Garcia, F., Mendez, D., Ellis, C., & Gautney, C. (2014). Cross-cultural, values and ethics differences and similarities between the US and Asian countries. Journal of Technology Management in China, 9(3), 322-303. Go to original source...
    23. Gilbert, P., & Choden (2014). Mindful compassion: how the science of compassion can help you understand your emotions, live in the present, and connect deeply with others. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.
    24. Gong, Y., Wang, M., Huang, J. C., & Cheung, S. Y. (2014). Toward a goal orientation-based feedback-seeking typology: implications for employee performance outcomes. Journal of Management, 39, 1924-1951.
    25. Gupta, A. K., Govindarajan, V., & Malhotra, A. (1999). Feedback-seeking behavior within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 20(3), 205-222. Go to original source...
    26. Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). Leadership in a (permanent) crisis. Harvard Business Review, 2009 (7-8), 1-9.
    27. Hepper, E. G. and Carnelley, K. B. (2010). Adult attachment and feedback-seeking patterns in relationships and work. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 448-464. Go to original source...
    28. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    29. Kim, T.-Y., Cable, D. M., Kim, S.-P., & Wang, J. (2009). Emotional competence and work performance: The mediating effect of proactivity and the moderating effect of job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 983-1000. Go to original source...
    30. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284. Go to original source...
    31. Krenn, B., Wuerth, S., & Hergovich, A. (2013). Individual differences concerning the impact of feedback specifying the role of core self-evaluations. Acta Psychologica, 55(2), 95-110. Go to original source...
    32. Lattuch, F., & Young, S. (2011). Young professionals'perceptions toward organizational change. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(6), 605-627. Go to original source...
    33. Leung, K., Su, S., & Morris, M. W. (2001). When is criticism not constructive? The roles of fairness perceptions and dispositional attributions in employee acceptance of critical supervisory feedback. Human Relations, 54(9), 1155-1187. Go to original source...
    34. Linderbaum, B. A. and Levy, P. E. (2010). The development and validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS). Journal of Management, 36(6), 1372-1405. Go to original source...
    35. London, M. (1997). Job Feedback: Giving, seeking, and using feedback for performance improvement. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    36. Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3-34. Go to original source...
    37. Miller, V. D. (1996). An experimental study of newcomers' information seeking behaviors during organizational entry. Communication Studies, 47, 1-24. Go to original source...
    38. Moeller, S. K., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Cognitive sources of evidence for neuroticism's link to punishment-reactivity processes. Cognition and Emotion, 24(5), 741-759. Go to original source...
    39. Neff, K. (2011). Self-Compassion: Stop Beating Yourself and Leave Insecurity Behind. New York: Harper Collins e-books,
    40. Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223-250. Go to original source...
    41. Neff, K. D., & Germer, C. K. (2013). A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self-compassion program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 28-44. Go to original source...
    42. Palomo, M., Beinart, H., & Cooper, M. (2010). Development and validation of the supervisory relationship questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 131-149. Go to original source...
    43. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. Go to original source...
    44. Raver, J. L., Jensen, J. M., Lee, J., & O'Reilly, J. (2012). Destructive criticism revisited: Appraisals, task outcomes, and the moderating role of competitiveness. Applied Psychology-An International Review, 61(2), 177-203. Go to original source...
    45. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
    46. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167-177. Go to original source...
    47. Scott, K. (2015). Radical Candor - The Surprising Secret to Being a Good Boss. Retrieved online from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yODalLQ2lM.
    48. Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416-427. Go to original source...
    49. Sinek, S. (2011). Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action. London: Portfolio.
    50. Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014). Empathy and compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), R875-R878. Go to original source...
    51. Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 165-184. Go to original source...
    52. Tsul, A. S., & Ashford, S. J. (1994). Adaptive self-regulation: A process view of managerial effectiveness. Journal of Management, 20(1), 93-121. Go to original source...
    53. Van der Rijt, J., van de Wiel, M. W. J., den Bossche, P. V., Segers, M. S. R., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2012). Contextual antecedents of informal feedback in the workplace. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23(2), 233-257. Go to original source...
    54. Vandewalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995-1015. Go to original source...
    55. Welch, J., & Welch, S. (2005). Winning. New York: Harper Business.
    56. Wilkie, D. (2016). No More Mr. Nice Guy: Workplace 'Front Stabbing' Gains Steam. Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved online from: https://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/employeerelations/articles/pages/radical-candor-.aspx.
    57. Wu, C.-H., Parker, S. K., & de Jong, J. P. (2014). Feedback seeking from peers: A positive strategy for insecurely attached team-workers. Human Relations, 67(4), 441-464 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content