Central European Business Review 2025, 14(3):1-19 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.389

Willingness of Gen Z Members to Give up Comfort in the Field of Sustainability, Waste Sorting, Electromobility: A Representative Study in Czechia

Robert Zámečník1, Radek Tahal ORCID...2
1 Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of Business Administration, Department of Marketing, Praha, Czech Republic. Email: robert.zamecnik@vse.cz
2 Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of Business Administration, Department of Marketing, Praha, Czech Republic. Email: radek.tahal@vse.cz (corresponding author)

A frequently discussed topic nowadays, especially in business, marketing or human resources, is the generation gap. Young people have a relatively strong environmental sense, which is also reflected in their choice of employment. When formulating the hypotheses, we proceeded from theories of social capital. Gen Z, which has grown up and matured in a fully digital world, attracts a lot of attention. This is evidenced by the many expert studies on the subject. One important reason for studying the behaviour and attitudes of Gen Z is their significant purchasing power. These people are on the rise or approaching the peak of their professional careers. In this paper, we focus on the topic of sustainability, attitudes towards waste management and electric vehicles. The paper aims to contribute especially to the analysis of the relationship between the declared benefits of the researched topics and the willingness to give up one's comfort to fulfil them. The analysis is based on primary data collected in 2023. The analysis conclusively confirms that the topic of sustainability is important for the young generation. Representatives of Gen Z exhibit a high level of critical thinking in the area of waste sorting and, in particular, the environmental benefits of electric vehicles. They are interested in real environmental benefits. The willingness to give up one's comfort is lower than the declared benefits of the phenomenon.
Implications for Central European audience: This paper addresses the topic of sustainability through the eyes of the young generation, specifically members of Gen Z. This is a topic of great importance for the European economy. The economic sector is forced to respect both EU regulations and the market environment, which, as our research shows, is not always in line with these regulatory interventions. Our research reflects the opinions of the young population in Czechia. Scholars can use the results for follow-up research studies, and so can practitioners in the field of marketing, strategic business orientation or human resources, especially when setting up communication with the young generation.

Keywords: Gen Z; sustainability; waste sorting; electric vehicles; comfort reducing
JEL classification: J40, M30

Received: May 5, 2024; Revised: September 28, 2024; Accepted: October 13, 2024; Prepublished online: March 27, 2025; Published: July 30, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zámečník, R., & Tahal, R. (2025). Willingness of Gen Z Members to Give up Comfort in the Field of Sustainability, Waste Sorting, Electromobility: A Representative Study in Czechia. Central European Business Review, 14(3), 1-19. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.389
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abrar, M., Sibtain, M. M., & Shabbir, R. (2021). Understanding purchase intention towards eco-friendly clothing for generation Y & Z. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1997247. Go to original source...
    2. Adefeso, I. B., Ikhu-Omoregbe, D., & Isa, Y. M. (2023). Economic evaluation of thermochemical conversion of municipal solid waste to syngas: A case study of cape town municipality. The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 25(2), 1179-1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01548-w. Go to original source...
    3. Andruszkiewicz, K., Grzybowska-Brzezińska, M., Grzywińska-R±pca, M., & Wi¶niewski, P. D. (2023). Attitudes and pro-environmental behaviour of representatives of Generation Z from the example of Poland and Germany. Sustainability, 15(20), 15068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015068. Go to original source...
    4. Barhate, B., & Dirani, K. M. (2022). Career aspirations of Generation Z: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0124. Go to original source...
    5. Bratina, D., & Faganel, A. (2024). Understanding Gen Z and Gen X responses to influencer communications. Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14020033. Go to original source...
    6. Bulin, D., Gheorghe,G., Kanovici, A. L., Curteanu, A. B., Curteanu, O. D., & Dobře, R. I. (2024). Youth perspectives on collaborative consumption: A study on the attitudes and behaviors of the Romanian generation Z. Sustainability, 16(7), 3028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073028. Go to original source...
    7. Ding, L., & Jiang, C. (2023). The effect of perceived collective efficacy and self-efficacy on generation Z restaurant customers' food waste reduction intentions. Journal of Global Responsibility, 14(3), 337-359. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-08-2022-0079. Go to original source...
    8. Djafarova, E., & Foots, S. (2022). Exploring ethical consumption of generation Z: Theory of planned behaviour. Young Consumers, 23(3), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-10-2021-1405. Go to original source...
    9. Ganguli, R., Padhy, S. C., & Saxena, T. (2022). The characteristics and preferences of gen Z: A review of multi-geography findings. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 79-98.
    10. Gosztonyi, M. (2023). Comparative analysis of X-Y-Z generation entrepreneurs in a semi-peripheral EU member country: Insights from regularized regression techniques. European Research Studies, 26(4), 191-217. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3280. Go to original source...
    11. Chen, X., Li, T., & Yuan, Q. (2023). Impacts of built environment on travel behaviors of generation Z: A longitudinal perspective. Transportation, 50(2), 407-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10249-6. Go to original source...
    12. Jali, M. N., Ahmad Fauzi, A. Z., Nan Zakiah, M. I., Rizal, E. R., & Mohd, N. S. (2023). Examining the relationship of environmental and community well-being towards sustainability of electric vehicles (EV) bus program. IOP Conference Series.Earth and Environmental Science, 1281(1), 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1281/1/012075. Go to original source...
    13. Kaczmarczyk, G., Malarczyk, M., Danton, D. F., & Kaminski, M. (2024). Stable rules definition for fuzzy TS speed controller implemented for BLDC motor. Applied Sciences, 14(3), 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14030982. Go to original source...
    14. Kovács, I., Lendvai, M. B., & Beke, J. (2024). Generation Z's consumer attitudes and purchasing intentions toward sustainable food consumption by settlement type in hungary, 2022. Regional Statistics, 14(1), 19-43. https://doi.org/10.15196/RS140102. Go to original source...
    15. Laąáková, A., Vojteková, M., & Procházková, L. (2023). What (de)motivates gen Z women and gen Z men at work? comparative study of gender differences in the young generation's motivation. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 24(4), 771-796. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2023.20439. Go to original source...
    16. Li, P., & Siti, H. H. (2023). Mapping the literature on gen Z purchasing behavior: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. Innovative Marketing, 19(3), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.19(3).2023.06. Go to original source...
    17. Loring, A., & Wang, J. (2022). Engaging gen Z in professional selling: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(5), 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0120. Go to original source...
    18. Makowska, M., Boguszewski, R., & Hrehorowicz, A. (2024). Generational differences in food choices and consumer behaviors in the context of sustainable development. Foods, 13(4), 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13040521. Go to original source...
    19. Martin, X. A., Escoto, M., Guerrero, A., & Juan, A. A. (2024). Battery management in electric vehicle routing problems: A review. Energies, 17(5), 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17051141. Go to original source...
    20. Maria, B. F., & Bredice, M. (2023). The sustainability of seafood products in the opinions of italian consumers of generation Z. Foods, 12(22), 4047. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12224047. Go to original source...
    21. Mazhar, T., Asif, R. N., Malik, M. A., Nadeem, M. A., Haq, I., Iqbal, M., Kamran, M., & Ashraf, S. (2023). Electric vehicle charging system in the smart grid using different machine learning methods. Sustainability, 15(3), 2603. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032603. Go to original source...
    22. Mohd, S. R., Nor, S. S., Ali, A. M., & Suaibah, A. B. (2023). Factors determining the acceptance of E-wallet among gen Z from the lens of the extended technology acceptance model. Sustainability, 15(7), 5752. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075752. Go to original source...
    23. Nguyen, V. D., Tri, C. P., Pham, T. T., & Phan, A. N. (2023). Digital and circular technologies for climate-smart and sustainable agriculture: The case of vietnamese coffee. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 1278(1), 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1278/1/012003. Go to original source...
    24. Nikolić, T., Paunović, I., Milovanović, M., Lozović, N., & Đurović, M. (2022). Examining generation Z's attitudes, behavior and awareness regarding eco-products: A bayesian approach to confirmatory factor analysis. Sustainability, 14(5), 2727. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052727. Go to original source...
    25. Ogunkunbi, G. A., & Meszaros, F. (2023). Investigating the role of urban vehicle access regulations as a policy tool for promoting electric mobility in budapest. Urban Science, 7(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7020039 . Go to original source...
    26. Pham, N. T., & Lam, T. (2024). Trade-in programs in the fashion industry: A win-win sustainability strategy for consumers and brands. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 19(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v19i1.6752. Go to original source...
    27. Palomo-Domínguez, I., Elías-Zambrano, R., & Álvarez-Rodríguez, V. (2023). Gen Z's motivations towards sustainable fashion and eco-friendly brand attributes: The case of vinted. Sustainability, 15(11), 8753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118753. Go to original source...
    28. Pandita, D., Agarwal, Y., & Vapiwala, F. (2023). Fostering the sustainability of organizational learning: Reviewing the role of gen-Z employees. Industrial and Commercial Training, 55(3), 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-09-2022-0064. Go to original source...
    29. Saxena, M., & Mishra, D. (2021). Gamification and gen Z in higher education: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.20211001.oa10. Go to original source...
    30. Sebastian, S. G., & Sulich, A. (2023). Electromobility: Logistics and business ecosystem perspectives review. Energies, 16(21), 7249. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16217249. Go to original source...
    31. Thoumrungroje, A., & Suprawan, L. (2024). Investigating M-payment intention across consumer cohorts. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(1), 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010023. Go to original source...
    32. Vieira, J., Carla Gomes, d. C., & Santos, V. (2024). Talent management and generation Z: A systematic literature review through the lens of employer branding. Administrative Sciences, 14(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030049. Go to original source...
    33. Wan, Q., & Du, W. (2022). Social capital, environmental knowledge, and pro-environmental behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031443. Go to original source...
    34. Warintarawej, P., & Nillaor, P. (2023). Implementing data analysis based on the mixed clustering technique for sustainable participatory waste management in a low-budget area. Foresight : The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 25(1), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-09-2021-0179. Go to original source...
    35. Zhao, L., & Chen, H. (2021). Exploring the effect of family life and neighbourhood on the willingness of household waste sorting. Sustainability, 13(24), 13653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413653. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content