Central European Business Review 2026, 15(2):113-132 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.411

Coaching and Mentoring as a Tool for Individualisation in Employee Learning and Development and Their Impact on Business Performance: The Mediating Role of Line Managers’ Involvement in HR Processes Observed in Medium and Large Enterprises

Zuzana Joniaková1, Branislav Zagoršek2, Hana Gažová Adamková3, Soňa Ďurišová3
1 The Academy of Performing Arts in Bratislava; Theatre Faculty
2 PitchBatch Business Incubator
3 University of Economics in Bratislava; University of Business Management, Management department

Contemporary Human Resource Management (HRM) emphasizes individualized approaches to employee learning and development (ILD), such as coaching and mentoring, and assigns key roles to line managers in HR processes. While both elements are recognized separately for their benefits, the joint impact of ILD and line managers' involvement (LMI) on overall company performance (CP), including productivity, innovation, and environmental effects, has not been extensively studied at the organizational level. This study investigates this relationship using data from a large-scale CRANET survey of 4145 medium and large companies across 38 countries. Utilizing Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modelling, the research tested a model examining the direct effect of ILD on CP and the mediating effect of LMI. The findings confirm a positive and significant direct relationship between individualized learning and development and company performance. The study also found that line managers' involvement positively mediates this relationship, which strengthens the effect. However, the analysis revealed that the direct effect of ILD on CP is substantially larger than the indirect effect mediated by LMI. These results provide clear direction for practitioners. Practitioners should incorporate individualized development methods, such as coaching and mentoring, while strategically leveraging managerial involvement to optimize business outcomes. Companies aiming to boost productivity, innovation, and environmental performance should include the implementation of ILD approaches. Simultaneously, they should support line managers in their HR roles as their involvement, although not the main driver, positively contributes to the overall impact. Implications for Central European audience: For Central European audiences, the sources reveal a significantly lower use of individualized learning and development compared to global averages. The study highlights a strategic opportunity for companies in Central Europe to boost competitiveness and innovation through coaching and mentoring. Theoretically, the study confirms a direct link between ILD and organizational performance, followed by further practical implications driven by individualization in LD and the usage of i-deals for increased engagement. Personalized development serves as the primary driver of improved performance.

Keywords: coaching; mentoring; individualized development; line managers; organizational performance
JEL classification: M53, M55

Received: February 26, 2025; Revised: May 31, 2025; Accepted: July 26, 2025; Prepublished online: June 28, 2026; Published: June 29, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Joniaková, Z., Zagoršek, B., Gažová Adamková, H., & Ďurišová, S. (2026). Coaching and Mentoring as a Tool for Individualisation in Employee Learning and Development and Their Impact on Business Performance: The Mediating Role of Line Managers’ Involvement in HR Processes Observed in Medium and Large Enterprises. Central European Business Review15(2), 113-132. doi: 10.18267/j.cebr.411
Download citation

References

  1. Adele, B., Ellinger, A. D., McWhorter, R. R., & Egan, T. M. (2023). Exploring learning outcomes for managers who coach. European Journal of Training and Development, 47(5/6), 635-652. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-12-2021-0198 Go to original source...
  2. Agarwal, R., Angst, C. M., & Magni, M. (2009). The performance effects of coaching: A multilevel analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(10), 2110-2134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190903178054 Go to original source...
  3. Ahmed, R. R., Streimikiene, D., & Zheng, X. (2021). The Impact of Proactive Environmental Strategy on Competitive and Sustainable Development of Organizations. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(4), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.04.01 Go to original source...
  4. Akyel, Y. (2018). Analysis of Relationships between Coaches' Organizational Justice and Leader-Member Exchange by Structural Equation Modeling. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n3p197 Go to original source...
  5. Al Hilali, K. S., Al Mughairi, B. M., Kian, M. W., & Karim, A. M. (2020). Coaching and Mentoring. Concepts and Practices in Development of Competencies: A Theoretical Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 10(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v10-i1/6991 Go to original source...
  6. Allen, T. D., & Eby, L. T. (2004). Factors Related to Mentor Reports of Mentoring Functions Provided: Gender and Relational Characteristics. Sex Roles, 50(1/2), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000011078.48570.25 Go to original source...
  7. Anand, S., Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., & Rousseau, D. M. (2010). Good Citizens in Poor-Quality Relationships: Idiosyncratic Deals as a Substitute for Relationship Quality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 970-988. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533176 Go to original source...
  8. Andreeva, T., Kabalina, V., & Muratbekova-Touron, M. (2023). Mind the gap: Intended versus perceived human resource practices and knowledge sharing of line managers and employees. European Management Review, 20(3), 443-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12545 Go to original source...
  9. Andrianto, R., & Supardi, S. (2023). Employee Development: Coaching and Mentoring Approach to Sustainability Organization. Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(7), 1797-1806. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v2i7.5190 Go to original source...
  10. Ardito, L., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Dezi, L., & Castellano, S. (2020). The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: Does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders?. Journal of Business Research, 119, 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.043 Go to original source...
  11. Bal, M., & Lub, X. D. (2018). Individualization of work arrangements. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Current issues in work and organizational psychology (1st ed., pp. 153-164). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468339-9 Go to original source...
  12. Beattie, R. S., Kim, S., Hagen, M. S., Egan, T. M., Ellinger, A. D., & Hamlin, R. G. (2014). Managerial Coaching: A Review of the Empirical Literature and Development of a Model to Guide Future Practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(2), 184-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422313520476 Go to original source...
  13. Beer, M., Boselie, P., & Brewster, C. (2015). Back to the Future: Implications for the Field of HRM of the Multistakeholder Perspective Proposed 30 Years Ago. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 427-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21726 Go to original source...
  14. Ben-Hador, B. (2024). The practice of manager as coach (MAC): Unequal power relations and their effect on feelings toward the organization. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 35(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21497 Go to original source...
  15. Bhatti, S. H., Iqbal, K., Santoro, G., & Rizzato, F. (2022). The impact of corporate social responsibility directed toward employees on contextual performance in the banking sector: A serial model of perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(6), 1980-1994. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2295 Go to original source...
  16. Bhawna, Sharma, S. K., & Gautam, P. K. (2024). The influence of subordinates' proactive personality, supervisors' I-deals on subordinates' affective commitment and occupational well-being: Mediating role of subordinates' I-deals. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 16(1), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-04-2023-0030 Go to original source...
  17. Billio, M., Costola, M., Hristova, I., Latino, C., & Pelizzon, L. (2021). Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1426-1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2177 Go to original source...
  18. Boehme, L., Russ-Eft, D., Rovens, J., & Rovens, A. (2023). HR managers stereotyping frontline managers. International Journal of Training and Development, 27(3-4), 360-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12304 Go to original source...
  19. Bondarouk, T., Trullen, J., & Valverde, M. (2018). Special issue of International Journal of Human Resource Management: It's never a straight line: Advancing knowledge on HRM implementation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(22), 2995-3000. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1509535 Go to original source...
  20. Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x Go to original source...
  21. Bos-Nehles, A., Townsend, K., Cafferkey, K., & Trullen, J. (2023). Examining the Ability, Motivation and Opportunity (AMO) framework in HRM research: Conceptualization, measurement and interactions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(4), 725-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12332 Go to original source...
  22. Bos-Nehles, A., Van Der Heijden, B., Van Riemsdijk, M., & Looise, J. K. (2020). Line management attributions for effective HRM implementation: Towards a valid measurement instrument. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(3), 735-760. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2018-0263 Go to original source...
  23. Bourg, J., Stoltzfus, W., McManus, S., & Fry, P. J. (2010). Proactive coaching for employee development and improved business results. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(10), 1005-1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.487705 Go to original source...
  24. Brewster, C., Brookes, M., & Gollan, P. J. (2015). The Institutional Antecedents of the Assignment of HRM Responsibilities to Line Managers. Human Resource Management, 54(4), 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21632 Go to original source...
  25. Brewster, C., Mayrhofer, W., & Morley, M. (Eds.) (2004). Human Resource Management in Europe: Evidence of Convergence? Routledge.
  26. Caliskan, E., & Torun, A. (2019). Individualized HR Practices and Idiosyncratic Deals (I-Deals) and the Expected Positive Individual and Organizational Outcomes. Istanbul Business Research, 48(1), 36-63. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0016 Go to original source...
  27. Cappelli, P. (2000). A market-driven approach to retaining talent. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 103-111.
  28. Carrell, W. S., Ellinger, A. D., Nimon, K. F., & Kim, S. (2022). Examining the relationships among managerial coaching, perceived organizational support, and job engagement in the US higher education context. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(5/6), 563-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2020-0145 Go to original source...
  29. Cerasoli, C. P., Alliger, G. M., Donsbach, J. S., Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Orvis, K. A. (2018). Antecedents and Outcomes of Informal Learning Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(2), 203-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9492-y Go to original source...
  30. Christensen, J., Bévort, F., & Rasmussen, E. (2019). The Cranet Survey: Improving on a Challenged Research-Practice?. International Studies of Management & Organization, 49(4), 441-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2019.1646491 Go to original source...
  31. CIPD. (2024). Coaching and mentoring [Factsheet]. Retrieved from https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/coaching-mentoring-factsheet/#what-are-coaching-and-mentoring
  32. Colakoglu, S., Lepak, D. P., & Hong, Y. (2006). Measuring HRM effectiveness: Considering multiple stakeholders in a global context. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.003 Go to original source...
  33. COR EUROPA. (2023, October 10). Mentoring: A powerful tool for tackling inequality. European Committee of the Regions. https://cor.europa.eu/sk/node/18226
  34. Davenport, T., Harris, J., & Shapiro, J. (2010). Competing on talent analytics. Harvard business review, 88(10), 52-58.
  35. Davis, A. S., & Van Der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2018). Reciprocity matters: Idiosyncratic deals to shape the psychological contract and foster employee engagement in times of austerity. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 29(4), 329-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21327 Go to original source...
  36. De Vos, A., & Cambré, B. (2017). Career Management in High-Performing Organizations: A Set-Theoretic Approach. Human Resource Management, 56(3), 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21786 Go to original source...
  37. Dyer, L., & Reeves, T. (1995). Human resource strategies and firm performance: What do we know and where do we need to go?. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3), 656-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199500000041 Go to original source...
  38. Eby, L. T. de T., Allen, T. D., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., Sauer, J. B., Baldwin, S., Morrison, M. A., Kinkade, K. M., Maher, C. P., Curtis, S., & Evans, S. C. (2013). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 441-476. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029279 Go to original source...
  39. Einarsdóttir, A., Ólafsdóttir, K., & Nesaule, L. (2018). The relationship between gender equality activity in organizations and employee perceptions of equality. Tímarit um viðskipti og efnahagsmál, 15(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.24122/tve.a.2018.15.1.2 Go to original source...
  40. Elg, M., Ellström, P.-E., Klofsten, M., & Tillmar, M. (2015). Sustainable development in organizations. In M. Elg, P.-E. Ellström, M. Klofsten, & M. Tillmar (Eds.), Sustainable development in organizations (pp. 1-15). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784716899.00006 Go to original source...
  41. El-Sharkawy, S. A., Nafea, M. S., & Hassan, E. E.-D. H. (2023). HRM and organizational learning in knowledge economy: Investigating the impact of happiness at work (HAW) on organizational learning capability (OLC). Future Business Journal, 9(1): 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00188-2 Go to original source...
  42. Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540119 Go to original source...
  43. Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Rousseau, D. M., & Morris, T. (2020). Line Managers as Paradox Navigators in HRM Implementation: Balancing Consistency and Individual Responsiveness. Journal of Management, 46(2), 203-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318785241 Go to original source...
  44. Garvey, B., & Stokes, P. (2022). Coaching and Mentoring: Theory and Practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Go to original source...
  45. Gašková, J. (2020). Servant Leadership and Its Relation to Work Performance. Central European Business Review, 9(3), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.236 Go to original source...
  46. Gay, D. M. (1990). Usage summary for selected optimization routines (Computing Science Technical Report No. 153). AT&T Bell Laboratories. https://ms.mcmaster.ca/~bolker/misc/port.pdf
  47. González-Masip, J., Martín-de Castro, G., & Hernández, A. (2019). Inter-organisational knowledge spillovers: Attracting talent in science and technology parks and corporate social responsibility practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 975-997. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2018-0367 Go to original source...
  48. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 Go to original source...
  49. Guest, D. E., & Bos-Nehles, A. C. (2013). HRM and performance: The role of effective implementation. In J. Paauwe, D. E. Guest, & P. M. Wright (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 79-96). Wiley-Blackwell.
  50. Gvaramadze, I. (2008). Human resource development practice: The paradox of empowerment and individualization. Human Resource Development International, 11(5), 465-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860802417601 Go to original source...
  51. Haggard, D. L., Dougherty, T. W., Turban, D. B., & Wilbanks, J. E. (2011). Who Is a Mentor? A Review of Evolving Definitions and Implications for Research. Journal of Management, 37(1), 280-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310386227 Go to original source...
  52. Honsová, P., Passmore, J., Jarošová, E., & Brown, H. (2020). Coaching in Visegrad Four Countries: A Comparison to other European countries. Journal of East European Management Studies, 25(4), 792-809. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2020-4-792 Go to original source...
  53. Hornung, S. (2018). Idiosyncratic deals at work: A conceptual and empirical review. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, & U. Can (Eds.), Eurasian business perspectives (Vol. 8/1, pp. 265-281). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67913-6_18 Go to original source...
  54. Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Glaser, J., Angerer, P., & Weigl, M. (2010). Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 187-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.625 Go to original source...
  55. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Go to original source...
  56. Hu, X. (2022). The role of manager's gender in mentoring: Evidence in the United Kingdom. LABOUR, 36(3), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12228 Go to original source...
  57. Huang, L., Guo, Z., Deng, B., & Wang, B. (2023). Unlocking the relationship between environmentally specific transformational leadership and employees' green behaviour: A cultural self-representation perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382: 134857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134857 Go to original source...
  58. Hutmanová, N., Hajduová, Z., Dorčák, P., & Fóthy, N. (2025). Analysis of Procrastination at Work and Employee Demographic Profiles in Slovak Smes. Central European Business Review, 14(1), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.377 Go to original source...
  59. Ibidunni, A. S., Kolawole, A. I., Olokundun, M. A., & Ogbari, M. E. (2020). Knowledge transfer and innovation performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs): An informal economy analysis. Heliyon, 6(8): e04740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04740 Go to original source...
  60. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088 Go to original source...
  61. Jones, R. J., Woods, S. A., & Guillaume, Y. R. F. (2016). The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta-analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 249-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12119 Go to original source...
  62. Jorgensen, T. D., Kite, B. A., Chen, P.-Y., & Short, S. D. (2018). Permutation randomization methods for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 708-728. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000152 Go to original source...
  63. Kehoe, R., & Han, J. H. (2020). An Expanded Conceptualization of Line Managers' Involvement in Human Resource Management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(2), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000426 Go to original source...
  64. Khakwani, S., Aslam, H. D., Azhar, M. S., & Mateen, M. M. (2012). Coaching and Mentoring For Enhanced Learning of Human Resources in Organizations: (Rapid Multiplication of Workplace Learning to Improve Individual Performance). Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(1), 257-266. https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/jesr/article/view/11795
  65. Kilroy, J., Dundon, T., & Townsend, K. (2023). Embedding reciprocity in human resource management: A social exchange theory of the role of frontline managers. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(2), 511-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12468 Go to original source...
  66. Kim, S., & Kuo, M.-H. (2015). Examining the Relationships Among Coaching, Trustworthiness, and Role Behaviors: A Social Exchange Perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(2), 152-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886315574884 Go to original source...
  67. Krupskyi, O. P., & Kuzmytska, Y. (2020). Organizational Culture and Business Strategy: Connection and Role for A Company Survival. Central European Business Review, 9(4), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.241 Go to original source...
  68. Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2010). The manager as coach as a driver of organizational development. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(4), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011043320 Go to original source...
  69. Liu, X., & Batt, R. (2010). How supervisors influence performance: a multilevel study of coaching and group management in technology-mediated services. Personnel Psychology, 63(2), 265-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01170.x Go to original source...
  70. Lombardi, S., Cavaliere, V., Giustiniano, L., & Cipollini, F. (2020). What Money Cannot Buy: The Detrimental Effect of Rewards on Knowledge Sharing. European Management Review, 17(1), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12346 Go to original source...
  71. López-Cotarelo, J. (2018). Line managers and HRM: A managerial discretion perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(2), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12176 Go to original source...
  72. Lyle, D. S., & Smith, J. Z. (2014). The Effect of High-Performing Mentors on Junior Officer Promotion in the US Army. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(2), 229-258. https://doi.org/10.1086/673372 Go to original source...
  73. Lyons, P., & Bandura, R. P. (2023). Manager-as-coach and use of scenistic tools for instruction. European Journal of Training and Development, 47(5/6), 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2021-0114 Go to original source...
  74. Milner, J., McCarthy, G., & Milner, T. (2018). Training for the coaching leader: How organizations can support managers. Journal of Management Development, 37(2), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-04-2017-0135 Go to original source...
  75. Milner, J., Milner, T., & McCarthy, G. (2020). A Coaching Culture Definition: An Industry-Based Perspective from Managers as Coaches. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320905126 Go to original source...
  76. Minbaeva, D., & Collings, D. G. (2013). Seven myths of global talent management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1762-1776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.777539 Go to original source...
  77. Nauta, A., & van de Ven, C. (2015). An I-deal Career: On the Relationship between I-deals and Career Development. In M. Bal & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Idiosyncratic deals between employees and organizations: Conceptual issues, applications, and the role of co-workers (pp. 65-72). Routledge. Go to original source...
  78. Neupane, R. (2015). Effects of Coaching and Mentoring on Employee Performance in the UK Hotel Industry. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management, 2(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijssm.v2i2.12323 Go to original source...
  79. Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the Twenty-First-Century Workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 245-275. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321 Go to original source...
  80. Omar, M. K., & Ramdani, N. F. S. M. (2017). Perceived work environment, perceived work values, and turnover intention among Generation-Y of a private trustee organization in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 1(2), 23-34.
  81. Paauwe, J., & Boselie, P. (2005). HRM and performance: What next?. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(4), 68-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00296.x Go to original source...
  82. Parry, E., Farndale, E., Brewster, C., & Morley, M. J. (2021). Balancing Rigour and Relevance: The Case for Methodological Pragmatism in Conducting Large-Scale, Multi-country and Comparative Management Studies. British Journal of Management, 32(2), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12405 Go to original source...
  83. Passmore, J. (Ed.) (2008). Diversity in Coaching: Working with Gender, Culture, Race and Age. Kogan Page.
  84. Passmore, J. (Ed.) (2021). Excellence in coaching: Theory, tools and techniques to achieve outstanding coaching performance (4th ed.). Kogan Page.
  85. Peel, D. (2004). Coaching and Mentoring in Small to Medium Sized Enterprises in the UK - factors that affect success and a possible solution. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 2(1), 46-56. Go to original source...
  86. Peretz, H., Fried, Y., & Levi, A. (2018). Flexible work arrangements, national culture, organisational characteristics, and organisational outcomes: A study across 21 countries. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(1), 182-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12172 Go to original source...
  87. Prince, N. R., Bruce Prince, J., & Kabst, R. (2020). National culture and incentives: Are incentive practices always good?. Journal of World Business, 55(3): 101075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101075 Go to original source...
  88. Ren, S., Tang, G., & Jackson, S. E. (2021). Effects of Green HRM and CEO ethical leadership on organizations' environmental performance. International Journal of Manpower, 42(6), 961-983. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0414 Go to original source...
  89. Rofcanin, Y., Afacan Findikli, M., Heras, M. L., & Ererdi, C. (2022). Idiosyncratic deals and individualization of human resource management practices: The growth of HR differentiation. In S. Anand & Y. Rofcanin (Eds.), Idiosyncratic deals at work (pp. 119-142). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88516-8_6 Go to original source...
  90. Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., Bal, P. M., Van Der Heijden, B. I., & Taser Erdogan, D. (2018). A trickle-down model of task and development I-deals. Human Relations, 71(11), 1508-1534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717751613 Go to original source...
  91. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 Go to original source...
  92. Rousseau, D. M. (2001). The idiosyncratic deal: Flexibility versus fairness?. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 260-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00032-8 Go to original source...
  93. Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T., & Greenberg, J. (2006). I-Deals: Idiosyncratic Terms in Employment Relationships. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 977-994. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527470 Go to original source...
  94. Rousseau, D. M., Hornung, S., & Kim, T. G. (2009). Idiosyncratic deals: Testing propositions on timing, content, and the employment relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.02.004 Go to original source...
  95. Sánchez-Marín, G., Lozano-Reina, G., & Beglaryan, M. (2022). HRM Policies and SMEs Performance: The Moderating Role of CSR Orientation. Central European Business Review, 11(1), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.279 Go to original source...
  96. Sardi, A., Sorano, E., Garengo, P., & Ferraris, A. (2020). The role of HRM in the innovation of performance measurement and management systems: A multiple case study in SMEs. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 43(2), 589-606. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2020-0101 Go to original source...
  97. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326 Go to original source...
  98. Seeck, H., & Diehl, M.-R. (2017). A literature review on HRM and innovation - taking stock and future directions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(6), 913-944. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1143862 Go to original source...
  99. Smith, M. K. (2018). High-involvement innovation: Views from frontline service workers and managers. Employee Relations, 40(2), 208-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2016-0143 Go to original source...
  100. Sobel, M. E. (1987). Direct and Indirect Effects in Linear Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001006 Go to original source...
  101. Srikanth, P. B., Jomon, M. G., & Thakur, M. (2022). Developmental idiosyncratic I-deals and its influence on promotability decisions: The joint roles of proactive personality and developmental challenge. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(10), 2083-2108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1841818 Go to original source...
  102. StataCorp. (2023). Stata user's guide: Release 18. Stata Press.
  103. Stokes, P., Smith, S., Wall, T., Moore, N., Rowland, C., Ward, T., & Cronshaw, S. (2019). Resilience and the (micro-)dynamics of organizational ambidexterity: Implications for strategic HRM. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1287-1322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1474939 Go to original source...
  104. Sue-Chan, C., Chen, Z., & Lam, W. (2011). LMX, Coaching Attributions, and Employee Performance. Group & Organization Management, 36(4), 466-498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111408896 Go to original source...
  105. Szierbowski-Seibel, K., Wach, B. A., & Kabst, R. (2019). The Collaboration of Human Resource Management and Line Management-An International Comparison. Organization Management Journal, 16(4), 262-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2019.1679076 Go to original source...
  106. Tabarovsky, J. F. (2015). The rise of "neo-individualism" in the workplace: A critical approach on coaching for workplace leadership. International Leadership Journal, 7(3), 59-82.
  107. Tanskanen, J., Mäkelä, L., & Viitala, R. (2019). Linking Managerial Coaching and Leader-Member Exchange on Work Engagement and Performance. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1217-1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9996-9 Go to original source...
  108. Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2014). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.837499 Go to original source...
  109. Townsend, K., & Kellner, A. (2015). Managing the front-line manager. In A. Wilkinson, K. Townsend, & G. Suder (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Managing Managers (pp. 104-119). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783474295.00015 Go to original source...
  110. Turker, D. (2009). How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9993-8 Go to original source...
  111. Van De Voorde, K., Veld, M., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2016). Connecting empowerment-focused HRM and labour productivity to work engagement: The mediating role of job demands and resources. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(2), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12099 Go to original source...
  112. Van Der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Notelaers, G., Peters, P., Stoffers, J. M. M., De Lange, A. H., Froehlich, D. E., & Van Der Heijde, C. M. (2018). Development and validation of the short-form employability five-factor instrument. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.02.003 Go to original source...
  113. Van Der Heijden, B., Nauta, A., Fugate, M., De Vos, A., & Bozionelos, N. (2021). Ticket to Ride: I-deals as a Strategic HR Tool for an Employable Work Force. Frontiers in Psychology, 12: 769867. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769867 Go to original source...
  114. Van Waeyenberg, T., & Decramer, A. (2018). Line managers' AMO to manage employees' performance: The route to effective and satisfying performance management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(22), 3093-3114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1445656 Go to original source...
  115. Wallo, A., Kock, H., Reineholm, C., & Ellström, P.-E. (2022). How do managers promote workplace learning? Learning-oriented leadership in daily work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 34(1), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-11-2020-0176 Go to original source...
  116. Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2013). Strategic HRM and organizational behaviour: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. In J. Paauwe, D. E. Guest, & P. M. Wright (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 97-110). Wiley-Blackwell. Go to original source...
  117. Yasin, R. (2021). Responsible leadership and employees' turnover intention. Explore the mediating roles of ethical climate and corporate image. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(7), 1760-1781. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2020-0583 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.